Moratorium & Dangers of WIFI Industries! Feb 23/12

Newsletter subscription

Recurring monthly subscription
$6.00 per month

Two months subscription
$6.00 per month

Site Manager

Tami Dickson

Polls

Please answer all poll questions. Part 1.
New Canadian Legislation Questions! Part 2.

Custom Search

tags: how to create a website

Moratorium & Dangers of WIFI Industries! Feb 23/12

Wednesday, 22 February 2012 19:15

Moratorium & Dangers of WIFI Industries! Feb 23/12

Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe calling for a moratorium on wireless technology.

Please pass this info on to your contacts

CDSAPI’s Added Comment:
Thankfully the Europeans are heeding the implications of the available data regarding EMFs – Electromagnetic Frequencies – and are recommending a moratorium on the proliferation of their use.
Why do our Governments in North American protect the Corporations to do whatever they deem “profitable” and more “efficient” – even though EMFs have the potential to severely damage, if not destroy, the health and survival of biological life. (The exponential demise of bees and birds are just the “canaries in the mine”.)

Governments – controlled by, and serving, the demands of Monopoly Corporations – have declared that only the CORPORATE ECONOMY counts - meaning the “right of Corporations to profit”, by hook or by crook.
“THE ECONOMY” does not refer to the economy of the population, nor the economic cost to the ecology and environment. These are merely “Corporate Resources” to be milked and fleeced on Corporate Decree and Demand.

Thus, if a technology of “greater profitability” damages or kills people and biological life, this is simply “written off” - deemed to be “acceptable collateral damage” – the price of doing business.

Considering the “technological” history since WWII, it is obvious that WISDOM seems extinct and deeply buried, and that the Rule of EXPEDIENCY prevails with unprecedented insanity.

After surviving the devastation of two World Wars, the European population, despite the Corporate Trade pressures, is not as ready to sacrifice their lives and those of their children for “technological expediencies that kill”.

What do their scientists know about EMFs that OUR government regulators are determined to ignore?

Use this as ammunition - and apply unrelenting pressure on our Government and regulators.

-----------------------------------------------------

Here are the EU recommendations:

Important Document from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe
(re ....same frequencies as "smart" meters, cell phones, and other wireless tech)

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) is a highly respected body of 47 members who do scientific, social and other reviews and act as a think tank for the EU advising them on policy.

They are calling for a moratorium on wireless technology until proven safe.
The draft resolution in the attachment above was adopted unanimously by the committee on 11 April 2011.
The recommendations here are ones all municipalities, government bodies globally need consider and hopefully immediately implement the precautionary principal with moratoriums.

The potential dangers of electromagnetic fields and their effect on the environment
Report1 Committee on the Environment, Agriculture and Local and Regional Affairs Rapporteur: Mr Jean HUSS, Luxembourg, Socialist Group

Summary

The potential health effects of the very low frequency of electromagnetic fields surrounding power lines and electrical devices are the subject of ongoing research and a significant amount of public debate.
While electrical and electromagnetic fields in certain frequency bands have fully beneficial effects which are applied in medicine, other non-ionizing frequencies, be they sourced from extremely low frequencies, power lines or certain high frequency waves used in the fields of radar, telecommunications and mobile telephony, appear to have more or less potentially harmful, non-thermal, biological effects on plants, insects and animals, as well as the human body when exposed to levels that are below the official threshold values.

One must respect the precautionary principle and revise the current threshold values;
waiting for high levels of scientific and clinical proof can lead to very high health and economic costs, as was the case in the past with asbestos, leaded petrol and tobacco.

F - 67075 Strasbourg Cedex | assembly@coe.int | Tel: + 33 3 88 41 2000 |
Fax: +33 3 88 41 2733

Microwave Warfare - Barrie Trower

EMF, WI-FI & MIRCROWAVE DAMAGE - Barrie Trower

973 - Barrie Trower -

This will automatically connect to the following 12 video’s in this interview.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjyfpVRPUVQ&list=PLEF47E5563AA26446&index=1&feature=plpp_video

Barrie Trower Autobiography

I trained at the Government's Microwave Warfare establishment in [the] 60’s. I worked with the underwater bomb disposal unit, which used microwaves.

In the 70’s I helped debrief spies trained in microwave warfare.

My first degree is in Physics. (I specialised in microwaves.)
My second degree is a research degree.
I have a teaching diploma in human physiology.
I teach advanced physics and mathematics at South Dartmoor College.

Author of the Tetra Report for the Police Federation.
I predicted the illnesses, which the officers now complain of.
These are illnesses that occurred before my report was published and cannot be psychosomatic.

At a conference in Birmingham I said “This Government, Industry and Government Scientists will be responsible for more deaths (of civilians) in peace time than all the terrorist organizations ever.”
The evidence I have is showing this is correct. I put my money where my mouth is and stand my ground.

It is easy to prove TETRA is not safe.

I would like those who sign to say "it is” and should go ahead, to stand trial in future years for their decisions.

If microwave systems are safe, why is there a still on-going stealth warfare industry, going back 60 years, based on the fact that these waves (AT TETRA STRENGTH) are, and have been used to cause illnesses now occurring in residents / police officers?

At this point in time, it is now into the germ warfare programme. If microwaves did not affect cells, this industry would not exist at all! No microwave communications system can be safe, especially TETRA. They are the same power as in the warfare industry and in Tetra’s case, the same pulse rate.

This Industry is a big money earner for everybody who gives permission to go ahead, yet they: the Government; Industry; Government Scientists; do not take any responsibility.

That falls on the Landowner and the user (Police Officer) who “volunteers” to use it as part of the 10 & 15 year cancer trial.

The option (given at the Police Conference – Birmingham) was to resign.

Tetra has a possible outlet of 32 Countries and 52 organisations within this Country, at present.

It must be stopped until there is a full judicial and public hearing into every aspect of this industry.

Not as in “Hansard” where the Minister in response to questions say’s “It is within Government guidelines”, which is based only on how warm you get: and even then it is wrong.

Somebody, somewhere, must stop what could be the biggest cause of illness around the World since the plague.

This must go public without fear/prejudice from those in a position of power.

The evidence is already to hand and proof can be obtained experimentally. In a few days. I will do it.

It is time that the intelligence of the general public was recognised and their wishes were respected, as opposed to Governmental pressure from an intimate relationship with Industrial Power/Money, on planners.

Latest reports

11 children leaving a school (sick) in Sussex.

11 Leukemia and 3 motor neuron diseases around a tetra mast in East Fife.

90 illnesses in Dersley around a new Tetra mast. Sadly, in each case, neither the police nor Industry could attend the MP’s ‘call’ for a meeting.

Only I turned up! How much confidence does that instill in everybody?

Barrie Trower

Document 2.:

In Sir William Stewart’s report page 113, frequencies between 300 MHz and 300 GHz are defined as microwaves.

This is in line with the International Commission’s definition of microwaves as defined in 1998.

Therefore everything discussed in this report is in the microwave frequency.

Microwaves react very differently in our water-based bodies to radio waves.

The term ‘Radio Frequency’ is often used to describe microwaves based communication systems.

It is important that the term ‘Radio Frequency’ is not associated with Radio Waves, but associated with microwaves.

Microwaves are used by the communications industry because they are more penetrative than radio waves.

The Stewart Report 2004 asks that anecdotal evidence be taken seriously in the absence of long-term epidemiological studies, concerning illnesses around the area of mobile phone transmitters. Such anecdotal evidence produced July 2002 refers to 92 cases of cancer around just 19 mobile phone transmitters.

Other illnesses on the same paper refer to breast cancers, thyroid, bowel and blood problems.

Another report dated November 2003 titled ‘School References (school and cell tower antennas)’ from 138 schools lists miscarriages, brain tumours, cancers, breast cancers and teachers ill within this report. One single school had transmitters on its roof in the Saint-Cyr-l’Ecole quarter of France where 8 cases of cancer were confirmed among children in the district.

Common sense dictates that if you surround the school with mobile transmitters, the children will be able to use their mobile phones in school, this obviously exacerbates the problem of surrounding the children with microwave radiation.

The Stewart Report on page 63, section 4.1.1 recommends …..RF fields to which the public will be exposed will be kept to the lowest practical level that will be commensurate with the system….

The same page the Stewart Group recommend….. Base Stations sited within school grounds that the beam of greatest intensity should not fall on any part of the school grounds or buildings without agreement from the school and parents. Similar considerations should apply to macro base stations sited near school grounds.

Doctor Gerd Oberfield of the Environmental and Resource Studies Programme, Trent University, Ontario, Canada, published a report dated November and December 2004, titled ‘Putting Cellphone Antennas near schools is too Risky’.

This report states:…..with respect to negative health effects on people living in close proximity to cell phone towers, there are three different epidemiological studies including our recent study. All of them found statistically significant relationships between exposure to radiation and health effects.

Two of the studies did measurements in subjects’ bedrooms and found significant increases in stress related symptoms as well and neurological symptoms…. Also depression, fatigue, sleep disorders and concentration difficulty were found. These symptoms were related to exposure levels, not distance from the antennas. A recent research project called EU-Reflex or European Union Risk Evaluation of Potential Environmental Hazards from Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure using sensitive in Vitro Methods shows that cells exposed to cell phone radiation exhibit chromosomal damage well below the exposure guidelines of the W.H.O.

It is worth mentioning that the ICNIRP Guidelines also the NRPB Guidelines are based purely on the thermal effect of the waves.

No account whatsoever is given to the effect of the electric and magnetic of the wave interacting with the physiology of the body.

The WHO’s Guidelines are based on the short-term effects of this radiation. No long-term experiments have been done in terms of safety levels.

Further, no experiments have been done to determine the safety levels from the pulsed microwaves exhibited by all microwave communication systems.

Doctor Oberfield’s report concludes…..as a general rule cell towers should not be placed near schools.

The recent Stewart Report on page 31, states: ‘Where a base station is to be installed near a school or college, local consultation is also required prior to the submission of an application for Planning Permission’. Page 53, continues…we also recommend that the mobile phone industry should refrain from promoting the use of mobile phones by children.

Placing mobile transmitters in the vicinity of schools cannot discourage the use of mobile phones by children.

Only this last Christmas the German VERUM group which consists of twelve research groups from seven countries, concluded that mobile phones cause DNA damage. It can be argued that as responsible adults in charge of Planning, giving the opportunity to children to use mobile phones, some responsibility MUST fall on the Planners for the scientific ignorance of the children.

Referring back to semi-scientific and/or anecdotal evidence concerning masts, at this present time in Osafia, Israel in the last four years, 165 people have died of cancer from living in the vicinity of antennas. This has now become a legal case.

Scientific research by Dr. John Walker has highlighted cancer clusters within the ‘footprint’ of base station transmissions.

Coloured photographs of cancer clusters can be found in the main part of base station beams.
Theoretically, looking at this research, which has covered several transmitters, it should be possible to predict future cancer clusters.

Dr. Walker’s research is on the Internet.

General practitioners in Naila examined the medical histories of nearly 1000 patients, searching for link between the distance of the patient’s living quarters from a long-standing mobile phone base station and the incidence of cancer. The physicians distinguished between an inner circle, within a 400m radius from the tower, and the area outside it. Tumours were found in patients living within 400m of the base station three times more frequently than among patients living outside.

The result of the Naila study, November 2004 shows that the proportion of newly developing cancer cases was significantly higher among those patients who had lived during the past 10 years at a distance of up to 400 m from the transmitter site, and that the patients fell ill on average 8 years earlier.

A similar study from the National Institute of Sciences (Professor Santini) showed from a study of 270 men and 260 women less than 300 m from a transmitter, showed signs of nausea, loss of appetite, visual and motor problems. Less than 100 m the symptoms were irritability, depression, concentration problems, memory dysfunction, dizziness, libido problems, headaches, sleep and skin problems.

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 03:04
by Eileen O´Connor

http://www.mast-victims.org/forum/index.php?action=vthread&forum=1&topic=56

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEF47E5563AA26446

Similar but different from the previous series sent...

Microwave Warfare - Barrie Trower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvn-8ITy0oc

BarrieTrower2of11.flv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P97M-hYy2lI&feature=related

BarrieTrower3of11.flv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRKM_t0qAUU&feature=related

BarrieTrower4of11.flv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WakVdW03UVY&feature=related

BarrieTrower5of11.flv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGXCRX57q3Q&feature=related

BarrieTrower6of11.flv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wi1OHgxewUQ&feature=related

BarrieTrower7of11.flv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IG1RClxAAa0&feature=related

BarrieTrower8of11.flv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7P10RKhmcnU&feature=related

BarrieTrower9of11.flv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNnRiJ4Q7Zc

BarrieTrower10of11.flv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqpoBRWxmkM&feature=related

BarrieTrower11of11.flv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_D7KNfzFTY&feature=related

Uploaded by ChurchCommittee2 on Sep 5, 2011

Interview with Brittish Microwave expert Barrie Trower.
By: Natural Science - http://naturalscience.org

This short excerpt, of the original video (2 Hours 20 Minutes) only deals with the Microwave warfare aspect.

More Videos on this topic: http://www.youtube.com/user/bradley22ist

Dangers of WIFI Industries Feb 15/12

Everything you need to know about the Wireless Industry, electromagnetic frequencies , Smart Meters, etc.- and the Politics involved,

Two excellent interviews with Barrie Trower – giving you invaluable information that gives you “the needed ammunition” when discussing these issues with the government and the industry “experts”.
All you need to know is there.-

(Note, if someone has found these two interviews, complete in one piece, please let me know the link. Thank you.)

An Expert in the field - Barrie Trower The truth about EMFs Electromagnetic Frequencies
Section 10 explains that now The Mobile Industry is the greatest Polluter on the Planet

Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjyfpVRPUVQ

Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZltkerG37g

Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAGhVGuoUmI

Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SNh8gfpL_Q

Part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbfCyupFDD0

Part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbfCyupFDD0

Part 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGOs5fPqReg

Part 8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGrA_Z4zFqo

Part 9 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbfCyupFDD0

Part 10 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Avak9DtXoQ

Big Carbon betrayal - a real inconvenient truth!

Part 11 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIgCPu_Siqk