Donate

Free newsletter



Site Manager

Tami Dickson

Follow Us





Follow Unittus
Search

Custom Search
Whistle Blower
Google Chrome spying Jan 30/14 Print E-mail
Wednesday, 29 January 2014 22:20

Google Chrome spying Jan 30/14

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
January 23, 2014

A whistleblower who privately informed Google four months ago that their Chrome browser had the ability to record conversations without the user’s knowledge has gone public after the tech giant failed to fix the issue.

In the video above, the programmer explains how Google Chrome’s speech recognition function remains operational even after the user has left the website on which they gave permission for the browser to record their voice.

“When you click the button to start or stop the speech recognition on the site, what you won’t notice is that the site may have also opened another hidden pop under window. This window can wait until the main site is closed, and then start listening in without asking for permission. This can be done in a window that you never saw, never interacted with, and probably didn’t even know was there,” writes the whistleblower.

The video shows a pop-under browser window recording and typing the programmer’s words as she speaks. The window can be disguised as an advertising banner so the user has no indication that Chrome is listening to their voice, whether that be on the phone, talking to someone on Skype, or merely having a conversation with someone near the computer.

The exploit is a “serious security breach” that has compromised the privacy of millions of Google Chrome users, according to the programmer, who warns, “as long as Chrome is still running, nothing said next to your computer is private.”

The exploit turns Google Chrome into an “espionage tool,” adds the programmer, noting that the recording function can be activated by the use of sensitive keywords and be passed on “to your friends at the NSA.”

The programmer reported the exploit to Google on September 19 last year and was met with assurances that it would be quickly fixed. However, despite apparently fixing the bug within two weeks, the update was never released to Chrome users, with Google telling the programmer, “Nothing is decided yet.”

As far back as 2006, we warned that computers would use in-built microphones to spy on users. We also revealed how digital cable boxes had embedded microphones that had the capability of recording conversations since the late 1990′s.

As we have previously highlighted, terms of agreement for both Android and iPhone apps now require users to agree to allow their microphone to be activated at any time without confirmation before they can download the app.

Facebook’s term’s of agreement also allow the social network giant to record your phone calls, read your phone’s call log and “read data about contacts stored on your phone, including the frequency with which you’ve called, emailed or communicated in other ways with specific individuals.”

We are now fully ensconced in a world that even George Orwell would have laughed off as inconceivable. Embedded microphones in everything from Xbox Kinect consoles to high-tech street lights that can record private conversations in real time represent the final nail in the coffin of privacy.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

 

 

 
911 Inside Job Murders Exposed! Jan 25/14 Print E-mail
Saturday, 25 January 2014 18:27

911 Inside Job Murders Exposed! Jan 25/14

Murdered to cover up financial fraud?

9/11 was nothing if not a multi-purpose job.

The fascists got to turn the US into a police state - and make a fortune in the process.

The weapons makers got a super bonus.

Dirt bag politicians who couldn't get re-elected as dog catchers got to pose as statesmen.

Oil companies got to triple and more the price of a barrel of crude.

Israel got the US war machine unleashed on its enemies and was granted further leave to savagely abuse the Palestinians whose lands they stole.

Even the Twin Tower's owners got a break. The Twin Towers were packed with asbestos that made the buildings technically in violation of the building code.  Abatement would have been financially impossible.  9/11 solved that problem.

9/11 also solved another problem.

It made hundreds of employees of various brokerage houses who were privy to some massively dirty financial dealings disappear - permanently.  The explosion at the Pentagon also eliminated some troublesome human resources problems: high level fraud investigators hot on the trail of a massive case.

If you want to trace the claims made in this video, you can do that here: References for Black 911
https://www.facebook.com/BrasscheckTV/posts/722568197758972

My apologies to non-Facebook users.  There is a seven figure reason why we could not list these resource on our site

- See more at http://www.realecontv.com/videos/the-911-files-1/bankers-spooks-and-911.html

 

https://www.facebook.com/BrasscheckTV/posts/722568197758972

References:

This is the film we'll be screening tonight....and some of the sources that went in to making it.

Black 9/11 names the identities of several 9/11 suspects that should be investigated if a criminal trial were ever to be conducted.

Special thanks to Michael C. Ruppert, Mark H. Gaffney, and Kevin Ryan for their dedicated research in bringing this information out of the shadowy black operations underworld from which it came. This video is a compilation of evidence they have uncovered.

"Inside Job" Documentary on the Financial "Crisis" of 2008
http://www.theotherschoolofeconomics/....

"Crossing the Rubicon" - The Decline of American Empire at the end of the age of oil
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/

"Black 911" by Mark H. Gaffney:
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2...

Was 9/11 an Inside Job?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.i/...

A guide to 9/11 Whistleblowers
http://www.corbettreport.com/articles...

Project Hammer
http://decryptedmatrix.com/live/bushs...

WTC 6
http://www.whale.to/b/wtc_6_h.html

SEC Act Section 12(k)2:
http://www.sec.gov/rules/other/34-447...

Read more...
 
CDC Charged for Fetus Deaths & Vaccine History! Jan 25/14 Print E-mail
Friday, 24 January 2014 22:00

CDC Charged for Fetus Deaths & Vaccine History! Jan 25/14

PRESS RELEASE: CDC charged with collusion on fetal deaths

Cdsapi’s comment and appeal:  Please help expose this “CDC Cover-up Report” in every way you can.  Make it go viral, and inform the media  -  because once again, during this present flu-vaccine season, Public Health Officials are continuously pressuring, as a top priority, the vaccination of pregnant women with the Flu vaccine. 
There was a 4250% spike in fetal deaths after pregnant women received the H1N1 vaccination during the 2009-2010 campaign – a fact still deliberately covered-up and publically denied by the CDC and Public Health Agencies. 
We must not permit this outrageous travesty to be repeated, again endangering the lives of the unborn fetus.  For pregnant women, this is a matter of life and death for their unborn babies. 
The Vaccine Program is one area where we cannot afford to tolerate any corruption of evidence and deliberate cover-up, making the survival of the Program more important than protecting the development of the unborn child and the health of infants and children. 
Note that historically, the CDC, from its inception, has always been the Public Relations arm of the pharmaceutical industry.  It is a corporate entity – and not a government agency, as generally believed.  It’s corporate job is to protect the public image of Big Pharma  -  and that is clearly what it is doing.  Accountability is imperative!

“Please alert every pregnant woman that you know – we owe them that protection.

Original (not highlighted) Press Release is attached.  cdsapi@shaw.ca

Forwarded Message:

From: Eileen Dannemann

Date: 22/01/2014 4:58:25 PM

Subject: PRESS RELEASE: CDC charged with collusion on fetal deaths

Hi folks:  Last week, after 3 years of work and obstacles from the establishment, our study on the 4,250% fetal death reports is now listed on PUB MED, free for all the world of professionals and public to see.  Yesterday I wrote a press release (attached) and suddenly this morning my computer went ballistic and the website got attacked with malicious malware.  Thanks to an IT guy in our network, the website has been cleansed and is being watched carefully for any further attacks.

Speculation has it that it could be the Epidemic Intelligence service (quasi military public health), that has the capablility of this kind of interference.

With that said, I have to send in my computer to apple, so I will not be able to send out the press release myself.  Now is the time where our vaccine researches have come to the apex of their work...we now have to get the press release out to the media.

Please take some time to send the attached press release not only to your networks but to the national media. Anybody who has access to PR release people, please help us slide through the cracks.  This is our cresendo...hope you can help to make it count.


Best regards,

Eileen Dannemann
Director,  National Coalition of Organized Women
Founder, www.VaccineLiberationArmy.com
319 855-0307

( I have added these highlights  -  original press release if attached.  i.h.)

PRESS RELEASE: CDC charged with collusion on fetal deaths

Press Release For Immediate Release                                
Wednesday, January 22, 2014

National Coalition of Organized Women Ncowmail@gmail.com
319 855-0307
Contact: Eileen Dannemann

 

CDC Misleads Nations Ob/Gyns - Covering-up The Most Massive Fetal Death Reports Associated With The Influenza Vaccine in the History of Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)

Dr. Gary Goldman’s study on the 4,250% spike in fetal death reports during the 2009/10 H1N1 “pandemic” originally rejected by the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology (AJOG), which is charged by the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) as complicit in a massive cover-up and manipulation of data associated with the 2009/10 flu season fetal deaths is now available free to the public.  Subsequently published in the Human & Experimental Toxicology Journal (HET), as a Sage choice study, the Goldman study is now listed in Pub med as a free PMC article.

 

Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons: was there a synergistic fetal toxicity associated with the two-vaccine 2009/2010 season? Goldman GS. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2013 May;32(5):464-75.

 

Despite an apparent trail of documented collusion and misconduct amongst the CDC, AJOG (Elsevier) and 9 non-profits including the March of Dimes, this alarmingly poor outcome of the 2009/10 H1N1vaccine experiment on the fetuses of pregnant women was successfully covered up by the CDC until Goldman exposed the statistics, documenting the harm in his recent publication.

Dr. Marie McCormick, chairperson of the CDC’s H1N1 Vaccine Safety Risk and Assessment Working Group (VSRAWG) testified, and submitted deceptive reports to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), contending no unusual signals nor adverse outcomes in the pregnant population during the 2009/10 public experiments on pregnant women.

However, pressed by the NCOW statistics extracted from the government’s own data, Dr. Shimabukuro of the Centers of Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) corroborated the NCOW data in a public presentation (slide 20) in Atlanta, Georgia, in October of 2010.  This contradiction to Dr.McCormick’s testimony evidences that the CDC indeed knew of the increasing level in fetal-loss reports, in near real time.  Yet the CDC failed to immediately notify the nation’s Ob/Gyns, who, uninformed, continued to double-dose their pregnant patients with the fetal-fatal flu shots that collectively delivered up to 50 micrograms of mercury.  Due to the success of this well-orchestrated cover up and the complicity of the non profits and AJOG, pregnant women are now pressured to get 4 vaccine doses, (Flu, TDaP) and thereafter are mandated to give up to 49 vaccine doses to their surviving children in order for them to attend school.

Beyond Junk Science:
“If vaccines were actually based on ‘science’, then this public experiment is a failure” says Ms. Dannemann, Director of the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) and founder of the Vaccine Liberation Army. So why are we still vaccinating pregnant women with even more vaccines when there is no science that proves vaccines are safe for the developing child. On the contrary, available data from this public experiment foisted on unwitting pregnant women proves the opposite - that the influenza vaccines are unsafe and exacerbate fetal deaths.”

In 2009/10 the CDC initiated a massive public drug trial, whose outcome was devastatingly morbid, covered up and, more egregious, twisted by complicit medical journal editors, government agencies and non profit organizations in order to provide an unholy, misleading and deceptive basis for a worldwide publicity campaign, "Flu Shot Is Safe for Pregnant Women”. The success of this manipulation and collusion continues to result in an ever-increasing amount of vaccine recommendations for pregnant women, advancing the flawed, unproven practice of maternal antibody-transfer to the fetus.

Vaccine Providers have immunity from lawsuits for any vaccine injury.  Federal law prevents directly suing a vaccine provider and the federal government agency charged with ensuring vaccine safety.  However, government personnel can be held accountable for willful misconduct contingent on the approval of the Secretary of HHS.  But, what about the non-profits that signed off on the joint letter for the following flu season urging the nation’s OB/Gyns to continue to vaccinate their pregnant patients?  Can they be held accountable?

 

A joint letter orchestrated by the CDC and co-signed by 9 non-profit organizations was sent in the fall of 2010, specifically targeting the nation’s Ob/Gyns, who, upon the recommendation of the CDC, had been injecting their pregnant patients with two separate influenza vaccines, the seasonal and the H1N1 vaccine, each containing 25 mcgs of mercury, totaling 50 mcgs of mercury, regardless of the trimester or the weight of the fetus.  The letter, strategically omitting reference to the 2009/10 VAERS data or Thimerosal, recommended only one seasonal flu shot for the following year, which as a trivalent, has all the necessary strains in one vaccine thereby limiting the toxic mercury dose to 25 mcgs instead of the fetus-fatal 50 mcgs.   If 50 mcgs. kills a fetus. Will 25 mcgs still harm the survivors?  Where is the science?

 

Although continuously informed by independent researchers, credible whistleblowers such as Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., social networks and Internet media, of the agency’s long record of distorted studies, acts of omission, misconduct, deception, spurious and strategic rhetoric, State lawmakers remain mindlessly wed to the CDC’s vast range of flawed government vaccine programs without evaluation… and wonder why the public is “acting up!”

 

But most egregious, in the opinion of NCOW – the agency assigned to educate physicians and protect the public’s health chose not to notify the nation’s Ob/Gyns in near real time, as promised by Dr. McCormick, thus putting the vaccine program itself ahead of the public’s health in order save this expanding pregnancy vaccine program from the immediate collapse it merits.  More disingenuous, the letter states, despite the disturbing VAERS data:

 

Influenza vaccine is safe” because:

“Influenza vaccines have been given to millions of pregnant women over the last decade and have not been shown to cause harm to women or their infants”.

“Hold on”, says Ms. Dannemann.  “The vaccine manufacturers themselves state and have stated for the past decade that there are no adequate studies on the effect of vaccines on human fetuses or on reproduction.  Manufacturers’ package inserts, Pregnancy Category C states and I quote ‘Animal reproduction studies have shown an adverse effect on the fetus and there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in humans’.  How did the CDC get away with recommending the vaccination of pregnant women for the last decade without proof of safety? Law requires proof of safety!  Well here is a safety study, albeit the sad results of another government experiment foisted on an unwitting public”, submits Dannemann. “The Goldman study!”

Can these non-profits be held liable for participating in the collusion to deceive the public?  Did the CDC tell the March of Dimes before they signed off on the joint letter urging the nation's Ob/Gyns to continue vaccinating pregnant women - that the outcome of the 2009/10 government initiative to vaccinate pregnant women with the flu shot resulted in the most massive spike of fetal death reports in the history of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)?

Or did the CDC purposely mislead the March of Dimes and the other non-profits by omitting the morbid data, seducing them into a campaign targeting the nation's physicians and misleading the public , and in doing so, save the ill-founded pregnancy vaccine program from falling apart?  Why does the American public not have a mechanism to investigate the misconduct of the CDC, thereby allowing the agency to continue to harm the very public they are supposed to protect?

Who has the authority on behalf of the public -- on behalf of humanity, to get an answer to this very simple question of whether the 9 non-profits were complicit in co- signing the joint letter, misleading the nation’s physicians? Was the HHS misled when Dr. Mc Cormick omitted the VAERS data from her monthly reports?

“Because the public apparently has no champion or channel to investigate this alleged collusion, the vaccine program for pregnant women advances unimpeded and continues to disable the emerging generations of humanity by weakening the fetuses and sabotaging its formative wellness!”, exhorts, Dannemann

The vaccine manufacturers package inserts state that there are no studies on the effect of vaccines on fetuses or on reproduction and yet, despite no safety studies as required by law, the CDC joint letter broadly admits that it has been giving pregnant women the flu vaccine for a decade.  On what science does the CDC base its rhetoric that there are no harmful effects when autism, allergies, asthma, juvenile diabetes, obesity and alleged “mental illness” as seen in children at very early ages, is at epidemic proportions concomitant to increased childhood vaccine mandates? How does this history of increased chronic illness in children, concomitant to increase childhood vaccine mandates, justify further weakening the emerging generation with in-utero assault?  In light of this clearly failed public experiment with its morbid statistics and no safety studies from the manufacturers, why are we continuing to vaccinate pregnant women? , The director of NCOW further opines.

Still another 2012 study involving analysis of maternal transfer of mercury to the developing embryo/fetus, by Brown et al. has been recently published, confirming the Goldman study.  Data demonstrated that Hg [mercury] exposures, particularly during the first trimester of pregnancy, at well-established dose/eight ratios produced severe damage to humans including death." (Brown IA, Austin DW. Maternal transfer of mercury to the developing embryo/fetus: Is there a safe level?)

Sadly, due to the CDC cover up, there is no official follow up of the children that survived this catastrophic epoch in vaccine history.  Asthma, diabetes, allergies, autism, ADHD, bi polar symptoms associated with vaccine injury is on the rise. “Given the recent publications of Goldman and Brown studies, is the CDC obliged to alert the nation’s pediatricians and parents of a potential health crisis in children injected in-utero in 2009/10 with 50 mcgs of Thimerosal (mercury), so they can consider cause, and treat accordingly?  Or will media, physicians, healthcare professionals, public, HHS officials and lawmakers, in apathetic powerlessness, continue to allow the CDC to shove this under the rug in an effort to hide the injurious nature of the over ambitious and costly pregnancy and childhood vaccine programs?”, comments, Ms. Dannemann

 

Access all links on http://vaccineliberationarmy.com/2014/01/20/cdc-cover-up-links/

 

Vaccine History!

dsapi's Comment:  Today a dear friend dropped into my lap a very valuable
and revealing piece of history, detailing the historical beginning of the
Vaccination saga.  Please note the similarity between what we are witnessing
today, and what these observant people reported soon after the Vaccine
Doctrine was prematurely and erroneously cemented into place in the early
1800s.  And cemented into place it remains to this day, for the same reasons
and with the same strategy.

Today, the medical profession and the government's Public Health manikins,
having inherited, adopted and embraced a scientific fallacious Vaccine
Doctrine, have decided to continue protecting themselves by adamantly
denying the facts from where "the rubber  meets the road", revealing a
multitude of seriously vaccine-damaged or dead children.

Now, as then, given the evidence of complete failure, to rescue and protect
their position the "facts" are denied, replacement data is "manufactured",
and the program is given extraordinary official standing and promotion,
eventually to the point of being declared "compulsory", with penalty for
non-compliance.

What else could they do but try to convince the trusting public that "this
bird that cannot fly on its own merit" is somehow a soaring miracle to
behold.
When will this remote-controlled pseudo-bird finally crash and reveal its
true nature?

"If society does not learn from history it is doomed to repeat it."
And it is doing precisely that.

Quote from Vaccination - a Delusion   1898

"The cases here referred to, of failure to protect even a few years, are
probably only a small fraction of those that occurred, since only in
exceptional cases would a doctor be able to keep his patient in view, and
only one doctor here and there would publish his observation.  The
controversy was carried on with unusual virulence, hence perhaps the reason
why the public paid so little attention to it.

But unfortunately both the heads of the medical profession and the
legislature has committed themselves by recognizing the full claims of
Jenner at too early a date and in a manner that admitted of no recall.  In
1802 as already stated, the House of Commons, on the Report of its
Committee, and the evidence that cow-pox was a perfect security against
smallpox - voted Jenner £10,000.

When therefore the flood of evidence poured in, showing that it did not
protect,
it was already too late to remedy the mischief that had been done,
since the profession would not so soon acknowledge its mistake,
nor would the legislature admit having hastily voted away the public money
without adequate reason.  "

(Note how, given the facts of complete failure, to cover their backsides the
facts were denied, data was artificially manufactured,  and the project was
given extraordinary official standing and promotion, eventually to the point
of being declared "compulsory", with penalty for non-compliance.)

"The vaccinators went on vaccinating,
the House of Commons gave Jenner £20,000 more in 1807,
endowed vaccination with £3,000 a year in 1808, and thereafter,
providing for free vaccinations in 1849,
made the operation compulsory in 1855,
and enforce it by penalties in 1867

Attached find the complete report  Vaccination - A Delusion  from 1898  - it
makes for some enlightening and revealing reading.      Hang on to it  -  it
is a reference you may not find again.

From cdsapi@shaw.ca

 
Classaction Common Wealth & Harper Queen Guilty! # 1 Jan 23/14 Print E-mail
Thursday, 23 January 2014 16:19

Legal Action at Can Gov Common Wealth Welcome! Aug 17/13

Perfect Canadian Swindle Servant King  15 minutes 15 seconds

http://youtu.be/g-PJDVG1uak More videos press programs at www.servantking.info

Our Legal Action       All Common Wealth Countries Citizens are welcome to join us!

It is not yet entirely clear to us, exactly how many civil litigations may be required in order for us to accomplish our objectives. For example, we know that Action(s) will be required against the Federal government respecting the offence of private money ownership via the Bank Act, and the offence of privatizing of national assets via another Act or Acts, all or some of which may enjoin various Ministries.

We also know we will be required in each province and territory to take Actions regarding the offence of denying private property ownership and protection of subsisting Crown Grants via the Land Titles Acts, and of course, Actions against the various Ministries, probably both provincial and federal, regarding the offence of the fraudulent creation and attachment of the registered names.

All of the above institutions or agencies serve in one way or another to enact and enforce statutes and by-laws that abrogate our fundamental natural human rights, contrary to the superior laws of the nation and the international treaties.

Now concurrent with all of the above, we will be taking action against each of the various provincial and federal law societies, the BAR associations and the appropriate Ministries of Justice, as the members of these organizations are complicit with the activities of the aforementioned institutions and agencies.

These court actions are designed to utilize the tools built into the system itself, to actually cause foundational and permanent change to that system, as it was originally designed to be. The result will be our freedom from the enslavement of the banker dominated money system, and to have a government that will be our servant and not our master, taking instructions from us, and not from the bankers.

As Canadians, we are being [criminally] deprived of our Patrimonial Entitlements, that being our right to freely enjoy our fair share of the natural wealth and resources of our nation, and therefore we are not only entitled, but we are morally obligated to take action aimed at stopping that deprivation. That is what our process is all about.

Our objective therefore, as you will find set out within all our information, is based on the unique premise that we believe we have finally come to understand the root cause of the legal and financial problems we all face, and how to fix it. So we intend to take action specifically aimed at eliminating that root cause, thereby permanently preventing any such future problems for everyone.

We are not attempting to cure or remedy an individual’s current legal or financial problems that often result from that root cause, as so many other remedies and processes have tried in the past, and are pointlessly continuing to try. This is what we hope our information will help you come to understand, and this is the goal we need people like you to be informed about and become involved in, and why we need you to help support us attain the objective of permanent changes to the root cause of all our problems.

We have a lawyer who has agreed to hand in his bar card(s) and help us take the legal action necessary to accomplish our objective which he understands to a degree that very few, if any, in the legal profession do.

In conclusion, let us quote from a recent e-mail from this lawyer,

“I need every single one of you on board to justify my stepping away from my practice and making such a potentially explosive application to the superior courts. And all of you certainly need me (or another competent lawyer willing to sacrifice his “legal” career) to properly handle this action…. We can [and will] win this, but to win a case of this scope and nature will not be easy, fast, or inexpensive.  Even as the sizable group we are, this will still be very much a ‘David & Goliath’ battle.”

Join us! www.humanrightsdefendersleague.ca

1 hour webinar below

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/globalfactradio/2013/07/05/conscious-living-guest-wally-dove-action-suit-against-canada

ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS

“Human rights defender” is a term used to describe people who, individually or with others, act to promote or protect human rights. Human rights defenders are identified above all by what they do and it is through a description of their actions (section A below) and of some of the contexts in which they work (section B below) that the term can best be explained.  The examples given of the activities of human rights defenders are not an exhaustive list.

A. What do human rights defenders do?

1. All human rights for all

To be a human rights defender, a person can act to address any human right (or rights) on behalf of individuals or groups. Human rights defenders seek the promotion and protection of civil and political rights as well as the promotion, protection and realization of economic, social and cultural rights.

Human rights defenders address any human rights concerns, which can be as varied as, for example, summary executions, torture, arbitrary arrest and detention, female genital mutilation, discrimination, employment issues, forced evictions, access to health care, and toxic waste and its impact on the environment. Defenders are active in support of human rights as diverse as the rights to life, to food and water, to the highest attainable standard of health, to adequate housing, to a name and a nationality, to education, to freedom of movement and to non-discrimination.  They sometimes address the rights of categories of persons, for example women’s rights, children’s rights, the rights of indigenous persons, tthe rights of refugees and internally displaced persons, and the rights of national, linguistic or sexual minorities.

2. Human rights everywhere

Human rights defenders are active in every part of the world: in States that are divided by internal armed conflict as well as States that are stable; in States that are non-democratic as well as those that have a strong democratic practice; in States that are developing economically as well as those that are classified as developed. They seek to promote and protect human rights in the context of a variety of challenges, including HIV/AIDS, development, migration, structural adjustment policies and political transition.

 

Last Updated on Saturday, 08 February 2014 21:15
Read more...
 
Spying Tech Disclosed Jan 23/14 Print E-mail
Wednesday, 22 January 2014 21:41

Spying Tech Disclosed Jan 23/14

Subject: FW: update 2014-01-20 Spying through technology, and lots of good letters.

Subject: update 2014-01-20 Spying through technology, and lots of good letters.

Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:15:42 -0800

1)   Not smeter -- A member sent this youtube about microchips, and how they are already being used to spy on us.

http://www.preppersworldusa.com/2014/01/18/microchip-invasion-spy-chips-home-find/

2)   The National Post speaks to the intrusion of having “dumb” appliances capturing data – why? When? Who wants it? What is happening to it?

http://business.financialpost.com/2014/01/18/google-inc-nest-smart-home/?__lsa=44f8-3373

As does CBC. Really interesting 2 min. video about computer technology in 1981 when 2000-3000 people in The Bay Area (San. Fran.) had home computers.

http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/episode/2014/01/20/whats-hidden-among-the-internet-of-things/

Letters:

From a members re. fees in emails to me:

1)   I had mentioned before that I had intended to pay for my usage and only $1 of the extortion fee.  I will pay each by separate cheques and on the $1 cheque I will write the memo "paid under duress".  I want to force them to send a collection agency after me, just to make things difficult for them.  When I get notice from the collection agency, then I will pay the rest by cheque, again "under duress".  I am not afraid to do this at all, as I think there is very little chance (if at all) my power will be interrupted.  I hope more people will force hydro into a billing nightmare.

2)   I know you are in a difficult position regarding what to tell people, but I am not.  I will not pay any fee additional amount other than that owed

for the electrical energy I used.

My bill was over twice what my usage suggests.

I have a "digital" not smeter, not an "analog" one. I used to teach my students how to read the analog meters, both with 4 dials

and with 5 dials.  Most understood quickly.  Some did not.

I understand that some of the meter readers hired by Hydro are having some

difficulty reading the meters.  This brings up two questions.

 

1.  Are these meter readers "new" and receiving a much smaller wage than the

previous employees?

 

2.  What do the meter readers do with the readings?  That is, how do they communicate

with "gestapo" headquarters regarding the bimonthly usage?  Is it phoned in?  Sent by iPad?

 

I will be drafting a letter tomorrow and sending it with my own "updated" and "accurate"

meter readings.

I hope everyone understands NOT to use automatic payments of any kind!

From members in emails to me, re. almost being off the grid:

 

1)    I am willing to go without their service if they  continue this theft. I do thank them subconsciously  often as I have changed my lifestyle in a huge way and feel so much better for doing so. I have felt like a recovering addict as I have slowly removed almost all electrical devices from my life (several computers, large flat screen tv, microwave, cordless phones, fans, heat pump, fridge, stove, dryer and other devices. I am a computer technician and web designer so it has been a big change. I purchased a small freezer that uses only 1.8 amps and freeze a couple gallon jugs for my fridge and it  keeps it as cool as when it was plugged in. My friends are always commenting on how quiet my house is. Didn't really notice the noise until it was gone. I run it on solar panels I installed on my carport last summer. I am still using less than $10/month of power although they keep estimating my bill using prices from a year ago. I see the end in sight.
If you are in the Comox Valley you are welcome to come by and see my self sustaining home and yard. (1200 sq ft home on just under 1/4 acre in a very nice neighbourhood)

 

2)   Hi,  just wanted to let you know that I have received the first Hydro bill with the surcharge.   My total for one month is $34.52.   This represents a months use of hydro at an average of 7 kw hours per day and the pro-rated legacy meter charge for 11 days.   However, I have since reduced my power consumption even more and am currently averaging 3.5 to 3.7 kw hours per day so my next bill for one month should be:  basic charge $4.58 plus usage 3.6 x $.0690= $7.45 plus the legacy charge of $35 = a total of $47.03 for one month.   This is manageable for me at the moment, although I'm not planning to pay the legacy meter charge for the time being.

 

Last Updated on Wednesday, 22 January 2014 21:44
Read more...
 
IRS Mafia Tactics & Master Card Visa Fraud! Jan 22/14 Print E-mail
Tuesday, 21 January 2014 21:33

IRS Mafia Tactics & Master Card Visa Fraud! Jan 22/14

Thought these were great!!

Disclosure: Check out the IRS’s stunning admission of its own mafia tactics (1-15-14)

January 13, 2014
Santiago, Chile

In the 3rd century AD, Emperor Caracalla famously remarked of Rome’s tax policy:

“For as long as we have this,” pointing to his sword, “we shall not run out of money.” (Of course, Rome did run out of money. )

At the time, Roman taxation was so extractive that it drove people into poverty and desperation. Yet the government continued to forcibly plunder wealth at the point of a sword.

Not much has changed.

The Taxpayer Advocate Service, which is an independent office within the IRS, has just released a two-volume report describing the mafia tactics that are being employed by the tax collectors in the Land of the Free.

The Executive Summary alone is 76 pages. And believe it or not, it’s a real page turner.

On page 37, for example, the report states that the IRS largely assesses tax penalties improperly.

Specifically, the Office of the Chief Counsel admonished the IRS that it was not legally authorized to impose accuracy related penalties on certain taxpayers, and that the service should abate those penalties already imposed.

Yet the IRS declined to follow its own Chief Counsel’s legal advice, and it has refused to abate penalties for nearly 90,000 taxpayers.

In the words of the agency’s own Taxpayer Advocate Service, “The IRS’s failure to abate inapplicable penalties signals disrespect for the law and a disregard for taxpayer rights.”

Page 34 discusses how the IRS has abandoned its own checks and balances.

When a taxpayer is deemed to owe the US government money, the IRS is supposed to have a “collection due process (CDP) hearing” to verify that the IRS agent followed the law and consider whether the intrusion on the taxpayer was warranted.

Yet the report states that this has become nothing more than a rubber stamp formality, and that current practices “do not provide the taxpayer a fair and impartial hearing.”

In fact, among the most litigated issues at the IRS, the report states that “taxpayers fully prevailed only about two percent of the time.”

Two percent. If you go up against the IRS, you have a 2% chance of winning. Give me a break. You have more than a 2% chance fighting against the mafia.

Moreover, the byzantine US income tax code, which runs to an incredible 72,000+ pages, “disproportionately burdens those who [make] honest mistakes”, especially as it relates to offshore disclosures.

In fact, the report acknowledges that “tax requirements have become so confusing and the compliance burden so great that taxpayers are giving up their U.S. citizenship in record numbers.”

It’s not exactly Emperor Caracalla pointing to his sword… but IRS’s policies and tactics are not so far off from a police agency.

They disregard the law and the advice of their own counsel. They disproportionately burden honest individuals. They flout due process. And they push people to abandon their citizenship.

These are mafia tactics, plain and simple. And like the Romans, Ottoman Empire, and French monarchy before, the tax system in the Land of the Free has become a desperate farce marked by fear and intimidation.

This is one of history’s obvious marks of a nation that has reached its terminal decline. We cannot seriously expect this time to be any different.

Source: http://www.sovereignman.com/tax/check-out-the-irss-stunning-admission-of-its-own-mafia-tactics-13381/

Transparency: IRS has Rules.... Do YOU know them?

Big Thank You to Justin for bringing this to my attention- more and more transparency being brought forward and made public!
Read more...

Visa / MasterCard FRAUD

Verified with Snopes:  http://www.snopes.com/crime/warnings/creditcard.asp

This is a heads up for everyone regarding the latest in Visa fraud. Royal Bank received this communication about the newest scam. This is happening in the Midwest right now and moving across the country.

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 9 of 57