Donate

Free newsletter



Site Manager

Tami Dickson

Follow Us





Follow Unittus
Search

Custom Search
Whistle Blower
Mnt Goat RV Countdown & Cafr Fraud Funds! Feb 13/15 Print E-mail
Friday, 13 February 2015 11:24
(Thank you George for emailing this to Dinar Recaps.)

UU1066 – “Quick Update” by Mnt Goat

We have been waiting a long time for this final conclusion and it is about to happen. I would not be writing and sending out this news letter today if I did not feel this revaluation was literally about to happen.

This is a continuation of the ongoing saga of the revaluation of the Iraqi dinar. Please read past news letter dated 2/12 (LINK) to better understand this news today.

Today’s News

Today is Friday the 13th and still no RV.  As we know president Masoum ratified  the 2015 federal budget bill on Tuesday Feb 10 and we now wait for it to be posted in the gazette. But don’t be in such a hurry for this since there could be complications if this is done too quickly. I will explain.

Let me explain something to you first that is very important. Technically we DO NOT want the budget bill to be posted in the gazette without an increase in value to the Iraqi dinar first. If they do not increase the value on or before this bill is posted in the gazette we are in trouble. What do I mean by in  “trouble”.

So far all the grand speeches by Abadi on economic reform along with all the new banking laws and changes to bring Iraq international are telling us with a high degree of certainty that they do NOT  intend to defy the basic rules of international monetary trade – that of having an international currency worth something.

What I am telling you is if the budget gets posted in the gazette without some major financial changes / restructuring taking place, then Iraq can not meet its financial obligations as approved under this new budget to pay debtors. They are in trouble !  It also is telling us that something smells very fishy and we will then have to take a step back and rethink what the heck they are doing since this will defy all logical sense and standard monetary practices. But I do not believe this will be the case. I do not believe this will happen.

Here we are on the third day following in the new parliamentary session that began on Feb 10th and still parliament has not yet voted on the “package” of new laws needed to support this new budget. I am being told this MUST take place first since these laws support the budget. Look at it this way. If they are allocating funds in the budget to support a project but the project has not yet been legally approved by the government then how can they fun a project that literally does not legally exist? Many of these projects also call for immediate, very large sums of money for down payments, as specified in contracts already signed and post-dated. Where will this money come from? They can not borrow this large sum of money since it is an entire year’s budget.

Today is Friday and a holy day in Iraq so not much normally happens. I am being told they will hold the session in parliament today. What is on the agenda? Many of these bills in the “package” of laws I speak about already have a first and second reading. We are not hearing any disputes, issues or arguments over these bills in the news, which is a good thing. This normally tells us the bills are written and everyone is happy with them. These bills include the HCL, Article 140, National Guard, Amnesty, Reconstruction, Education, Defense, etc…all the ones we heard so much about.

All the reforms agreed to and they have been working on over the last four (4) months. The National party as to now make good on the promises of the 27 reforms used to negotiate them into power to form the government in the first place. Remember the May through September timeframe? They must now make good on their promises.

However to make them legal they must go through the entire legislative process. This process means at least 2 readings and a final vote. Next these bills must be posted in the gazette. All this can happen very quickly since it is my understanding the Federation Council is now established and reviewing these new laws. Is this holdup?

No I do not believe the Federation Council is or will be a holdup in this legislative process. I explained to you in my last news letter why I feel this way. So then what is the hold up?

Abadi made a short speech to the news the other day. He was specifically talking to the provinces and telling them to be patient. he was not talking to us directly but we know we must be patient too. They are waiting for their funding for these projects since they know the budget has been passed and now ratified. The reason the government has been pushing this budget along to get it completed was because they fully intended to fund it and begin spending it – like ASAP. But there is a delay, hold up, a snag. These are unpredictable and just happen.

What I am hearing is simply that technical issues are holding up everything. These are not hard issues to fix and the GOI and the CBI want them fixed prior to moving forward. I know this sounds fishy but it is what I am being told and I believe my source. Iraq now has control over when the RV happens.

WHAT COMES NEXT?
You all know what comes next. They must fund this budget of 119 trillion dinars. I have to tell you there is not enough dinars in circulation today to cover this budget amount and they know this. So where will they get this much needed dinar with a rate of 1166?  They have huge stockpiles of the lower denominations but currently they too are valued at the 1166 rate.

In my last news letter I stated what the next steps have to be on or about the time of the revaluation announcement in Iraq. They then have to de-dollarize and get the lower denominations out to the banks as this process will take many months to normalize. But first they need to complete the economic reforms and this means in part to go international with their currency. As this happens we all expect the rate to change to at least a rate conducive to pre-war era.

TIMEFRAME?

If you have been paying attention to what I have been saying in my past news letters and especially today’s news you know that they are about to revalue the Iraqi dinar IQD and it MUST happen in the coming next few days ahead (not weeks). I fully expect something to happen very soon – like tomorrow or today since the deadline for posting in the gazette ends tomorrow and like it or not the budget bill automatically gets posted in the gazette and is then technically opened and fully implemented. Can they try to stall the posting?  Yes maybe by a day or two since anything is possible in this process when Iraq is involved. But this is only a temporary delay to fix what they need to fix, as I mentioned above.

Do not be discouraged. Just as sure as I am sitting down in my office in Bavaria today, overlooking the Alpine mountains of my village, writing this news update – we will see this RV very shortly.

It is coming !

So you see Al-Abadi along with the CBI have to make a decision soon on when to RV this currency. I believe this decision has already been made weeks ago and we are now in the final countdown window now that the budget is truly ratified and the deadline for it to be posted in the gazette is about to expire.   We should hear news of this next event (gazette posting) today or tomorrow. Then Iraq must fully fund the budget within 24 hours (partly by a revaluation). Can Iraq be fully positioned with all these events in time to open and begin spending this 2015 budget?

Peace and Luv To Ya All,
Mnt Goat

Here is a Challenge for You!
by Walter Burien - CAFR1.com
12/17/14



I will keep this article very simple and to the point .

On the syndicated news today they are pitching imposing a tax on e-cigarettes.

The politician that introduced the bill justifies the new proposed tax with one and one only statement:

"If we do not tax e-cigarettes, where else will we get the money we need from?"

I have heard the same blanket comment over and over again per raising taxes for the last 40-years.

That comment made by a politician to the public is the biggest insult that can be rendered per directly calling the listeners "useful idiots" when it comes down to the reality of government's gross income from the many sources of: Tax, Investment, Enterprise, etc.

Government's gross income is obscene and has expanded exponentially each and every year through depending on the population being masterfully entertained while being spoon fed with blatant "selective presentation" with the contrived comment of: "where are we going to get the money from?"

A good and clear analogy per the same would be; A politician sitting in a row-boat in the middle of the ocean who says: "Where am I going to find salt water?" said with an overtone as if it were a genuine question, and depending on the listener's ignorance not to see the ocean surrounding the row-boat..

Here is a link with instructions to view and download many local Government's Annual Financial Reports that I sent out in a previous post to the CAFR1 National email list last week:


http://www.gfoa.net/cafrwinners/2013/index.html (**To get the CAFR download listing for each local government entity - Click on the "Winners List by Agency Type" in the centered blue boxes)

That link with the Click on instruction followed by you will list about 3000+ local government CAFRs for downloading, view, and review. All categorized by local government type and alphabetically listed by each state.

** The 3000+ listed is but a very small fraction of the Annual Financial Reports produced each year by local government operations [approximately 184,000 local government operations nationally]

Any one of the reports upon careful and detailed review gives you a pretty clear view of "where the money comes from" or "can come from" per ANY local government CAFR looked at.

For your state, download the applicable CAFRs in your State listed and put on one DVD for distribution to other activists in your state. For those that seriously look, some eyes will really start to open upon review of the same.


The CAFR on the local governments listed, being that local government's "Statement of Net-Worth" derived over decades if not over a century is "the book" to review. Selectively created "Budgets" "for a year" are in all reality very pale in comparison to looking at the same local government's Annual Financial Report, the CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report).

Bottom line? Being that the CAFR shows the "Big Picture" of the massive standing wealth and true gross income involved, the Silence is Golden rule is strictly maintained from within the halls of government; Political Parties; controlled Education, and the "syndicated Media" talking heads. Simple and open mention of the CAFR to the general public by any party from the inside would effect their immediate termination / blackballing due to directing the public towards the massive wealth, standing investments (domestic and International) and true "overall" gross income involved and seen therein.

On an example of what can jump out at you when you look at any CAFR report, I grew up in NJ and recently  I glanced at the Port Authority of NY and NJ 2013 CAFR as listed under "Enterprise" agencies. Well, what jumped out at me was they allocated 3-Billion dollars of their "own monies" for the re-building of the World Trade Center complex. Well, I always thought that being Larry Silverstein received about a 6.5 billion dollar insurance payout per the destruction of the original WTC complex, that "he" would be paying for the re-building of the WTC complex. Upon review of that CAFR, it was apparent that not $1 came directly from Larry Silverstein to rebuild the complex.

Mr. Silverstein had taken out a 99-year lease of the WTC complex months before it was destroyed (demolished). The deal required him to make monthly payments to the NY & NJ Port Authority under the lease terms. When he got the lease, one of the first things he did was to take out a double indemnity insurance policy per terrorist attack on the WTC complex. When the insurance policy was underwritten by several large insurance providers, of which took a while to cover that large of a policy, in so many words: "The ink was not even dry yet on the policy" and down went the Towers and in went Silverstein's insurance claim which resulted with about a 6.5 billion dollar payout to him.

So, when I saw the Port Authority was paying for the rebuilding of the WTC complex and 3-billion dollars allocated by them, that showed me that Silverstein (a joint US and Israeli citizen)  accomplished probably the largest profit in world history in the shortest period of time. You see he only had about 4 monthly payments made (under 130 million dollars) and received about a 6.5 billion dollar payout. So why did not the Port Authority of NY and NJ not require Larry Silverstein to cough up the cost for rebuilding the WTC complex??? Especially in light of the fact that he was paid billions of dollars under the insurance policy due to the destruction of the original WTC complex?

That was just one point that jumped out at me from a quick look at that "one" CAFR.

When you see from the link above the listing of the many local government CAFRs from your state, and upon a basic review of the same, I am confident that "many things will jump out at you from each."

Now here is an exercise that every one of you and your associates can do to learn the biggest reality check of your lifetime. The CAFR is the "Holy Grail" of accounting for the majority of the local governments out there, their Statement of Net Worth. The exercise I request that YOU DO IS TO sincerely ask your local syndicated media (ABC, CBS; FOX, NBC, etc.) talking head to make the following very "simple" statement / question to his or her viewing audience:  "I have become aware of our local government's Annual Financial Report known as a CAFR. I request that my viewing audience Google and then download a few of the City, County, State, and Enterprise CAFRs, and make a cursory review of the same and please get back to me over the next several weeks with comment."

Well, there is NO REASON what-so-ever for them not to do so. Kinda like asking a Priest to make simple mention the Bible to their parishioners, asking them to look at the Bible and get back to him with comment. The reality check for you comes into play due to the reality of the Silence is Golden Rule in place. The simple mentioning of the CAFR by any syndicated media talking head violates that rule. It  will not happen within the syndicated media realm. Independent media personalities with a limited audience may mention, but the syndicated media personalities with very "large audiences", and the big thumb of management hanging over them per simple mention of the CAFR are up against a 1-mile thick concrete wall to NOT openly mention to the public or else....

Let me know if you have success in doing so, per the "simple mention" by "any" syndicated media talking head to their viewing audience. I was successful in doing so once in 1995. The anchor from ABC in Phoenix after being challenged by me to make clear and simple mention of the CAFR did so. She in fact did a full camera shot of the State of Arizona 1994 CAFR as she made clear mention of the same. Well, her mention aired on the 10 PM News but on the normal repeat of the 10 PM News segment the following morning at 7 AM, that segment was cut and that anchor for ABC Phoenix was replaced the following day. She breached the Silence is Golden rule and swift repercussions by ABC management against her was the prompt result..

PLEASE share this communication with all of your contacts and post to News Sites and Blogs where you can.

Sent FYI and for your action from,


Walter Burien - CAFR1.com
P. O. Box 2112
Saint Johns, AZ 85936

Tel.(928)458-5854

PS: Can YOU breech the Silence is Golden rule with you local syndicated media talking heads? If no, the reality check will have been learned. If yes, I and many others will be absolutely amazed and grateful...!

I will not be able to keep website on the internet without financial assistance until release. If you read without helping me why? Please use the donation button Tami

Last Updated on Friday, 13 February 2015 11:27
 
Racial Hiring Immigration Myths & Degrade Isis in Canada! Feb 11/15 Print E-mail
Wednesday, 11 February 2015 16:34

Racial Hiring, Immigration Myths & Degrade ISIS in Canada! Oct 12/14

Folks there are all kinds of discrimination. Sadly there is still a lot of ignorance about spiritual, gender, business and galactic matters on the planet. Many still scoff at our Residual income offer, galactic influences into our government business area which has much to do with mind control making absurd incorrect decisions about policies and people. For my issues people who continue to violate my rights in anyway due to these unconscious idiotic judgments my way will be charged I have had enough.  I have a legal team primed to take actions in Canada, USA and international if needed. If you want to continue to be criminal in your choices you will pay with a variety of measures even regarding immigration in Canada. There will be no amnesty or immunity contrary to criminal negotiations.! Tami

If It’s OK to Degrade ISIS in Iraq, Why Not Degrade It In Canada?

Canada’s Parliament has just voted to approve a 600 member Canadian combat mission in Iraq to counter the actions of ISIS.

It remains to be seen whether this will be a wise move or not.

As readers will see in the quotation below from a Muslim, a significant ISIS-Like presence already existed in Toronto 11 years ago . It is undoubtedly much larger today. So what is Canada’s Parliament going to do about that?

The Muslim population in Canada has increased very quickly. Unnecessary immigration from Muslim-dominated countries is the cause of that increase. In the period 2001 to 2011, Canada’s Muslim population went from 579,000 to more than 1 million. Unmonitored immigration from those countries is also the major cause of any increase in Canada’s ISIS-like supporters. In 2011, Toronto had the largest population of Muslims, at just over 424,900. Montréal had just over 221,000 and Vancouver about 73,200.

A dramatic cut in Canada’s overall immigration intake would go a long way to reducing the threat of ISIS in Canada. Once again, in sending a combat mission to Iraq, Canada is acting internationally when it should be acting domestically to clean its own house.

“IT WAS A COLD January morning in 2003 as I walked through ankle – deep icy snow into the Toronto Convention Centre. I was attending a conference of Muslims arranged by groups allied to the Saudi – based World Assembly of Muslim Youth – WAMY. The freezing temperature and frosty welcome I received at the hands of the young Islamists had not prepared me for the chilling lecture I was about to hear. The speaker, a Kuwaiti politician, said: “Western civilization is rotten from within and nearing collapse…it [the West] will continue to grow until an outside force hits it and you will be surprised at how quickly it falls.

“The crowd burst into applause. Just sixteen months beforehand, an “outside force” had hit the New York Twin Towers on 9/11, and here was Tareq Al Suwaidan, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood from Kuwait, rubbing salt into the wounds of the West. The audience of more than two thousand young Canadian Muslims, many of them associated with the Muslim Students Association (MSA), carefully segregated into male and female sections, listened in awe. Suwaidan used elaborate charts to draw projections about the impending collapse of the West. They lustily cheered the Kuwaiti Islamist as he predicted the doom of the very civilization these young men and women were living in.

“Why were these Muslim youth, (who were) born and educated in Canada, cheering the fall of the West? Did they not consider themselves to be part of the West? If they did, why would they be cheering its imminent collapse and who were they expecting to carry out the “outside force” attack? How could they, as citizens of a democratic Western country, allow a Kuwaiti politician to write the obituary of the West, but also cheer him on as he did so?”

← UBC Prof’s Evidence Damns Business Immigrant Programme

Preferential Hiring   (what I witnessed is immigrant discrimination rampant against white Canadians with our government help Tami)

The Pursuit of Division: Race, Gender and Preferential Hiring in Canada by Dr. Martin Loney, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1998

Dr. Martin Loney is the author of “The Pursuit of Division: Race, Gender and Preferential Hiring In Canada”, the most extensive study of Canada’s employment equity (known elsewhere as affirmative action) and preferential hiring policies. Dr. Loney shows that current policies which have affected the lives of thousands of Canadians were based on the idea that “systemic discrimination against visible minorities” existed in hiring in Canada’s workplaces.

He examines a large body of data and shows that the “systemic discrimination” claim is ideologically driven, and that a number of visible minority groups were actually in employment positions superior to those of the majority population. As groups, they were actually doing better economically. Other visible minorities were doing just as well. Although some visible minorities were doing poorly, the fact that this was happening did not show that “systemic discrimination” existed. It clearly did not demonstrate that there was a need for employment equity legislation which has resulted in race-based hiring throughout Canada’s public service and in Canada’s private sector. This campaign began in the late 1980′s, has permeated all three levels of government as well as the private sector, and continues today.

However, as Dr. Loney shows, the entire Employment Equity programme, so- named to elicit a programmed politically-correct response, should have been seriously questioned at the time it was being considered. It clearly should have been rejected because it is based on a selective use of statistics, not facts. Dr. Loney demonstrates that Canada’s Employment Equity programme has created inequity for a large number of Canadians because it is institutionalized discrimination against white males. He also asserts that this preferential hiring legislation is a major divisive force in Canadian society. Canada’s federal government should be pursuing policies of unity, not division.

The following is Dr. Philip Resnick’s brief review of “The Pursuit of Division”. Dr. Resnick is a professor of political science at the University of British Columbia and author of “Twenty-First Century Democracy”.

“In this explosive study of identity politics, Martin Loney argues that an improbable alliance of radical feminists, multicultural bureaucrats, and politicians chasing ethnic votes has produced a divisive political agenda at the expense of a shared Canadian community. He examines changes to government policies that have placed race and gender at the centre of Canadian discourse and shows that ‘fraudulent claims, nepotism, shoddy research, and self-serving rhetoric have propelled a politics of grievance’ to the detriment of those who really need government assistance, Canada’s poor.

“‘The Pursuit of Division’ is a well-researched and well-argued challenge to prevailing orthodoxy on equity politics and identity politics in Canada. Loney does an extremely effective job of debunking the selective approach to data that characterizes too much of the discourse in favour of preferential treatment and brings a long overdue comparative dimension to the discussion by situating the Canadian treatment of minorities within a global framework.”

www.immigrationwatch.com

IMMIGRATION MYTHS :

MYTH #1 :

Canada needs large numbers of immigrants because it will face massive shortages of skilled labour in the coming decades.

The facts:

There will be no such shortages if more Canadians acquire the needed skills, which can be accomplished if wages, government policies and other conditions encourage them to do so and the jobs are not filled by immigrants. With a few exceptions—such as the present and temporary shortage of medical workers—Canada has both the human resources and educational infrastructure to meet our skilled labour needs.

MYTH #2 :

Canada is sparsely populated and can support a much larger population.

The facts:

Despite Canada’s large surface area, much of it is not suited for human habitation. It would require a large input of food and energy for any significant number of people to live there and this would have both economic and environmental costs.

A large majority of recent immigrants have chosen to live in large cities, most notably Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, because of the wider range of social services, the higher quality of life, economic opportunities and the presence of relatives and immigrant communities in these locations.

This does not result in net benefits for most of the residents of these large cities and increases pressure on educational and health care facilities as well as adds to housing costs, commute times and environmental problems.

MYTH #3 :

With an aging population and lower fertility rates, Canada needs high levels of immigration to provide the workers and tax base required to support social services for retirees.

The facts:

While it is true Canadians are living longer and having fewer babies, research shows that immigration has almost no impact on offsetting the costs of an aging population. Immigrants themselves grow old and draw on social support services while on average they have families as small as those of other Canadians.

For immigrants to make a net contribution to the support of social services, they would have to pay more in taxes than they receive in benefits. In recent years this has not been the case as newcomers have usually earned substantially less than native-born Canadians and have drawn significantly more in social services than they have paid in taxes.

The only ways to deal with the effects of an aging population involve increases in productivity and raising the age of retirement to accord with improvements in the population’s health and longevity.

MYTH #4 :

 


High levels of immigration are required to ensure Canada’s prosperity.

The facts:

A country’s prosperity does not depend on a growing population or workforce. This is particularly true in the case of Canada since we are a trading nation and do not require an increasingly large domestic market to achieve economies of scale. Our prosperity depends rather on sound economic policies that stimulate productivity, make good use of capital investment and maximize the potential of the existing workforce.

This information was created by Canada’s Centre for Immigration Policy Reform (www.immigrationreform.ca). Their full set of 15  MYTHS is available on their web site.

Here is a previous bulletin which deals with five other Immigration Myths :

http://www.immigrationwatchcanada.org/2011/01/01/for-new-years-2011-five-immigration-myths-exposed/

UBC Prof’s Evidence Damns Business Immigrant Programme

Posted on September 28, 2014

UBC Prof’s Evidence Damns Business Immigrant Programme

1. Canada and other countries began giving immigration priority to Business Immigrants (BI’s) in the late 1970′s. In UBC Professor David Ley’s book, Millionaire Migrants”, he refers to the BI as “homo economicus”, that is, “economic man” whose economic capital was prized over the social/educational capital that many traditional immigrants had brought here. This new type of immigration indicated a change from permanent immigration to temporary and circular immigration.

2. Canada is one of 30 countries that have business immigrant programmes.

3. David Ley’s focus is on economic migrants who came from Asia, particularly Chinese from Hong Kong and Taiwan. Over 33 million Chinese have migrated to other countries, 7 million outside of Asia.

4. In 2001, 73% of Chinese Canadians lived in Toronto (410,000) and Vancouver (343,000), a result attributable in part to the BI programme.

5. Although Canada’s motive was to stimulate its economy, the motive of many of Vancouver’s BI’s was to get Canadian citizenship which they regarded as an “insurance policy” against Mainland China’s potential interference in Taiwan and Hong Kong.

6. Canada soon saw that its objectives and those of the Chinese BI’s were opposite. David Ley says : “Departure from the bull markets of East Asia to the slow if steady returns and high taxation of Canada was a dubious economic proposition, and migration was seen much more as an a project to maximize family objectives : geopolitical security, educational options for children, quality of life for the nuclear family and often (a better place for) ageing parents.” (P.26)

7. In 1988, Vancouver’s EXPO 86 lands (about one-sixth of Vancouver’s downtown area) were sold to Hong Kong billionaire Li Kashing at a bargain price. He had been involved in property purchases in Vancouver and other Canadian cities on a small scale in the late 1960′s. David Ley says that in the same year, David Lam was appointed Lieutenant Governor of B.C. This was a very clear symbolic counterpart to the sale of the Expo lands and a clear signal to Asia that B.C. was open to entrepreneurs. (P.55)

8. Between 1980 and 2008. about 400,000 immigrants entered Canada through the BIP. Canada’s high BIP numbers are attributable to how easy it was to enter Canada. (BI’s had to get only 35 points to satisfy immigration requirements compared to 67 for skilled immigrants). (Pp.58-59)

9. Between 1980 and 2001, most immigrants (about 78%) went to three areas : Toronto–40%; Montreal–14%; Vancouver–14.2% Most refugees went to Toronto (35.8%) and Montreal (18.5%). Only 7.0% went to Vancouver. (P.60)

10. Language inability is correlated with failure : 57% of BI’s could not speak French or English, compared to 44% of all immigrants.

11. Korean entrepreneurs were more successful than the Hong Kong and Taiwanese groups because they worked in non-ethnic areas. (P.111) Vancouver and Richmond entrepreneurs recorded the weakest performance because they competed with one another. Their experience confirmed European experience where “breaking-out” of the enclave was seen as a necessity for success. (P.112)

11. Surveys showed that relatively few BI’s (62%) were planning to work here, thus subverting government objectives. This compared to 76% of all immigrants and 85% of skilled workers. Hong Kong, Taiwan, China and South Korea accounted for most of BI’s to Toronto (58%), Montreal (54%), and Vancouver (80%). Most South Koreans came as entrepreneurs. Vancouver took 15,000 more BI’s than Toronto between 1980 and 2001. This was to cause significant increases in Vancouver’s housing market, and make most housing unaffordable. (P.63)

12. A national panel study of more than 12,000 immigrants who landed in 2000-2001 found that 37% of BI’s in Vancouver had purchased single family housing within 6 months, compared with 17% for other immigrants and refugees. (P.64).

13. Canada’s senior immigration officer in Hong Kong incorrectly described Business Immigrants as immigrants landing on their feet running. (Pp.64-65)

14. Ottawa boasted about all of the money that BI’s brought with them : from 1986 to 2005, $8.7 Billion had been registered in subscriptions and about 25,000 jobs maintained or created. It would not be long before officials suspected that the job creation numbers were inflated. About $27 Billion was brought to the Vancouver area in the years 1988 to 1997. (P.70) Huge inflows of billions arrived at banks. (P.71) BI’s sought ways to put money into safe places in order to avoid taxes. Peter Newman’s book, “Titans”, portrayed Asian BI’s as success stories. The Vancouver Sun ran abridged segments of Newman’s book on its front pages. David Bond of the Hong Kong -Shanghai Bank of Canada boasted that if he were the czar of immigration, he would send a fleet of Boeing 747′s to Hong Kong to pick up BI’s. All of this hype was false. Ottawa assumed that these people would be revealing their assets and that it would be receiving significant revenue from Business Immigrants, but that did not happen.

15. In fact, a senior Citizenship and Immigration manager said that gov’ts did not know if the BIP was working—-even after 15 years. (P.108)

16. Many BI immigrants were cheated by immigration consultants. Ottawa knew about this, but did nothing for 24 to 25 years. In 2004, it required consultants to organize themselves into a self-regulating association. “Among the paradoxes of the BIP is how a programme so revered by senior governments has contributed so much anguish among its clients.” (P.120)

17. David Ley conducted two surveys of BI’s. The first was on 24 immigrants. The second was on 90. The results did not flatter the programmes. A large number of BI’s did not file tax returns because they were no longer here. They had satisfied minimal requirements and then left to pursue better opportunities elsewhere. Another study by Marger did a panel study of 70 entrepreneurs in the early 1990′s. Seven years later, half of his panel had disappeared. The majority of the missing were from East Asia.

18. Australia and New Zealand have recorded similar outcomes. Quality of life and better educational opportunities for their children were considered more important than satisfying government objectives.

19. Ottawa tried to introduce laws requiring all Canadians to disclose assets, particularly those being held offshore, but a lobby developed among millionaire migrants in Vancouver, not among WASP lawyers in Toronto, to oppose such legislation. The Chinese lobby was supported by the Glen Clark NDP government in B.C. and by the federal Liberals. By 1998, after China had re-taken Hong Kong and fear of China had eased, investor and entrepreneur immigration from Hong Kong and Taiwan had fallen by 94% and 78% respectively. Many wanted to keep their offshore assets secret in order not to pay their share of taxes. British Columbia MLA Jenny Kwan stated that “the Chinese are very private with their money. This law goes against our culture,” implying that the Chinese should be allowed to operate in Canada by a separate set of rules !! (P.96)

20. Between 1987 and 1997, Hong Kong had been the largest source of immigrants to Canada, reaching 30,000+ per year. However, after 1997, this number fell to 2000 per year. (Pp.73-74) Ottawa’s foreign assets disclosure laws and the Asian Financial crisis that began in 1997 were two important reasons. (P.77)

21. David Ley says ” The economic circumstances of immigrants among the ethnic Chinese population in Canada have been poor. Tax returns in 2000 showed average incomes of $15,000, half the average for the entire population. BI’s reported even lower incomes, around $13,000 with many households declaring incomes below the official poverty line.

22. Entrepreneurs had to show success within two years. They were supposed to be monitored by officials every 6 months. Such monitoring often did not occur, but Ottawa allowed them to stay. To avoid not staying in Canada for the required time each year, business immigrants would go to the U.S., fly to Asia and later return to the U.S. and enter Canada without the perusal of immigration authorities. Many immigrants paid consultants to remove immigration requirements for them and later acquired citizenship illegitimately. CIC was aware of hundreds of cases of fraud, but did little.

23. By the late 1980′s, 50,000 to 60,000 Canadian university graduates worked in HK. Other estimates said that over 200,000 Hong Kong residents held Canadian passports. (P.226) For many HK’ers, return is a distinct possibility; for some, an intended probability. David Ley says that a 2007 study by the Chinese-Canadian Historical Society of B.C. includes the startling estimate that two thirds of Chinese-Canadian males with Canadian citizenship but of Hong Kong origin, and between the ages of 25 and 44, live and work outside of Canada. (P.92)

24. Price Waterhouse reviewed the entrepreneur and self-employed streams in 1989 and found that over half of its list who had landed in the past 2 to 3 years did not respond. Of the other half interviewed, only half were meeting the requirements while only 35% of these businesses were profitable. The consultants concluded that the annual BI scorecard was significantly inflated. In 1992, Ernst and Young concluded that the Investor Immigrant programme exaggerated by three times its actual employment benefits. In 1999, a senior forensic auditor from the World Bank told CIC that its Investor programme contained systemic corruption. It was “a massive sham. The middlemen made hundreds of millions of dollars….Claims about the benefits of the programme in terms of job creation and investment have been widely inflated.” A CIC administrator said that the availability of large capital funds and weak supervision led to “a feeding frenzy, driven by provincial corruption and hungry lawyers, a very dirty programme that brought out the worst in our legal and business group”. (P.121)

25, Smelling money, CIC Department employees left to become immigration consultants.

← Immigration Has Caused Vancouver’s Astronomic Housing Prices

 
Mind Control Military, Gov, corporate Agendas explained! Jan 20/15 Print E-mail
Tuesday, 20 January 2015 15:16

This is a significant, to which I’m paying attention. I particularly note the solutions which have been presented in this update.

“Although a large part of the scalar plasma grid has been removed after the opening of the IS:IS portal, a large part still remains… it is of utmost importance for the people to be aware of the existence and the influence of the scalar plasma grid and other energy weapons that the Cabal under the guidance of Chimera group uses to suppress human consciousness and to prevent the arrival of Light.

“…try to maintain the state of balance and harmony amidst all daily activities. That means learning to master the skills of time and priorities management and learning when to say yes and when to say no, and to remove all toxic elements, situations and people out of your lives. It is also good to find some quiet time each day to spend in nature and/or in meditation to reconnect with your higher self.

“Dragon sources have communicated an effective protection meditation protocol… the so-called Violet Ray device can help you.

“Another decisive element in this occult war is to bring as many people as possible away from darkness and into the Light. There are many members of the middle management of the Cabal that are doing dark deeds only because they are forced into it or because they see no other option…

” This coded message has been communicated to those middlemen from a certain source that wishes to remain anonymous: »The capstone of the pyramid has been removed. The all seeing eye has been forced shut and does not watch you anymore. You are now safe to return to the Light of Love. Tubal Cain.«

“The Resistance Movement has issued a few warnings to the hard core of the Cabal to stop attacking Lightwarriors and Lightworkers with scalar directional energy weapons. Since those warnings were ignored, the Resistance has initialized »release the dogs« protocols… This means that the surface of the planet has suddenly become quite unsafe for the core members of the Cabal. This is why Donald Rumsfeld sold his house and escaped to New Mexico:

“The Resistance Movement has communicated that if the directional energy weapons attacks do not stop, they might trigger protocols for the rapid arrest of the unholy four: Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, George Bush Sr. and Henry Kissinger.

“If those protocols are triggered, they will have drastic and destabilizing effect on the planetary geopolitical situation and although they would speed up the Event…”

——————————————————–

Protection

Although a large part of the scalar plasma grid has been removed after the opening of the IS:IS portal, a large part still remains. Breakthrough phase does not mean only rainbows and pretty comets, we are in the middle of occult war between forces of Light and forces of darkness.



Therefore it is of utmost importance for the people to be aware of the existence and the influence of the scalar plasma grid and other energy weapons that the Cabal under the guidance of Chimera group uses to suppress human consciousness and to prevent the arrival of Light. Here is a relatively good article about it:

https://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2015/01/18/think-bigger-look-deeper-part-two-by-bradley-loves/

The Event will NOT happen until the scalar plasma grid is taken care of.

Many Lightworkers and Lightwarriors are primary targets of directed energy weapons because they are the primary security threat to the current slavery prison planet matrix and its handlers.

The first guideline for protection for targeted individuals is to try to maintain the state of balance and harmony amidst all daily activities. That means learning to master the skills of time and priorities management and learning when to say yes and when to say no, and to remove all toxic elements, situations and people out of your lives. It is also good to find some quiet time each day to spend in nature and/or in meditation to reconnect with your higher self.

Dragon sources have communicated an effective protection meditation protocol. It is recommended to use this protocol once or a few times daily and maintain this protection shield throughout the Breakthrough phase to maintain the vibrational frequency of Light:

1. Relax your body, emotions and mind by focusing on your breath or in any other way that works for you

2. Visualize a brilliant white vortex of Light emanating from your Soul star chakra downwards throughout your body in a clockwise direction, purifying the energy fields of your physical, plasmatic, etheric, emotional and mental bodies. Maintain this vortex by connecting it to the source of universal Light and program it to maintain all your energy bodies purified

3. Visualize an egg shaped semi-permeable mirror shield around your auric field of your physical, plasmatic, etheric, astral and mental bodies. This mirror shield lets all positive energies into your energy field, but reflects and bounces all negative energies back to their source (return-to-sender). Program this mirror shield to alert you when any type of negative energy is directed your way and let it reflect it back to its origin

4. Visualize Light rearranging all parts of yourself and all parts of your energy fields back into state of balance and harmony. While doing that you can hum mantra OM because OM is the primaeval sound of Light and its resonance will restore harmony most effectively.

If you are under strong plasma/scalar attack, the so-called Violet Ray device can help you. By applying the wand in your auric field you can remove negative plasma generated there by the scalar attack:

http://altered-states.net/barry/newsletter510/

Violet Ray/Darsonval device is a Tesla coil device which generates a positive plasma field and transmutes negative plasma which was generated by scalar wave manipulation.

Another decisive element in this occult war is to bring as many people as possible away from darkness and into the Light. There are many members of the middle management of the Cabal that are doing dark deeds only because they are forced into it or because they see no other option, being under financial, psychological and physical pressure or manipulation. They are the bribed congressmen, misled high level freemasons, greedy CEOs of companies, pilots operating killing drones, soldiers pulling the trigger, personnel operating scalar directional weapons, religious fanatics acting out their traumas on innocent civilians.

This coded message has been communicated to those middlemen from a certain source that wishes to remain anonymous:

»The capstone of the pyramid has been removed. The all seeing eye has been forced shut and does not watch you anymore. You are now safe to return to the Light of Love. Tubal Cain.«

Dragon sources have suggested a meditation to bring Light into the souls of those people and many of them will cross into the Light, thus effectively weakening the power base of the Cabal:

1. Relax your body, emotions and mind by focusing on your breath or in any other way that works for you

2. Visualize a vortex of brilliant white Light descending from the Soul star chakra of all those Cabal middlemen into their energy field and their personality, awakening them to the reality of Light, guiding them to step away from the Cabal, giving them power to set themselves free from darkness

3. Visualize all those Cabal middlemen joining the planetary network of Light, putting down their weapons of destruction and deceit, learning to cooperate and joining the human society in a constructive way.

One of the biggest psychological blocks of the Cabal is their inferiority complex which they try to hide and mask with all that bragging about »bloodlines«. The inconvenient truth is that Cabal Khazar bloodlines originate from the primitive, crude, violent and less intelligent Neanderthal man, whereas the human masses evolved from more refined, balanced and more intelligent Cromagnon man:

http://www.democratic-republicans.us/neanderthals-and-semites/



Please understand that although the article above might be ideologically biased, most of hard science facts still stand. Just insert Khazarians instead of Semites/Jews when you read the article.

The Resistance Movement has issued a few warnings to the hard core of the Cabal to stop attacking Lightwarriors and Lightworkers with scalar directional energy weapons. Since those warnings were ignored, the Resistance has initialized »release the dogs« protocols. This means that they no longer hold back surface individuals and groups that would like to off members of the Cabal by their own free will and initiative.

This means that the surface of the planet has suddenly become quite unsafe for the core members of the Cabal. This is why Donald Rumsfeld sold his house and escaped to New Mexico:

http://www.noodls.com/view/2448F46606DA1A61429CDD4439C188A8E6C52262?4722xxx1420968910

Joe Biden already had a taste of this new situation:

http://starshipearththebigpicture.com/2015/01/18/interesting-coincidences/

The Resistance Movement has communicated that if the directional energy weapons attacks do not stop, they might trigger protocols for the rapid arrest of the unholy four: Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, George Bush Sr. and Henry Kissinger. ( This should have happened by now so our future soldiers will be stepping in. Tami)

If those protocols are triggered, they will have drastic and destabilizing effect on the planetary geopolitical situation and although they would speed up the Event, the whole transition would be much more chaotic and violent. The Resistance is well aware of the connections of the unholy four with the Chimera group. The Resistance is hoping sanity will prevail and extreme measures can still be avoided.

On a more positive note, RR6 will be activated tomorrow and during this activation, plasma tail of comet Lovejoy will pass through Pleiades as seen from Earth. This cosmic event will send a wave of positive energy towards the plasmatic Tunnels of Set around the surface of this planet and will be a trigger for their transformation. Summarily, we can expect a lot of activity of the Light forces in the following week.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 16:38
 
Global Classaction, Common Law Juries in Canada & Harper Queen Quil ! Jan 5/15 Print E-mail
Monday, 05 January 2015 15:29

Legal Action at Canadian Gov Common Wealth Welcome! Aug 17/13

Canadian Common Law Juries and councils forming anyone in integrity who wants to participate contact www.republicofKanata.com or http://thegoodlylawfulsociety.org or www.humanrightsdefendersleague.ca

http://beforeitsnews.com/eu/2014/11/canadian-police-are-stood-down-bowing-to-common-law-revocation-order-nullifying-crown-authority-in-canada-2573868.html

check www.tntdinar.com  and 1-800 RV numbers here www.tntsuperfantastic.com or www.tntsuperfantastic.net  or www.tntsuperfantastic.org

Perfect Canadian Swindle Servant King  15 minutes 15 seconds

http://youtu.be/g-PJDVG1uak More videos press programs at www.servantking.info

BC Hydro Gov Smart meter Crimes Classaction go to for individual & businesses www.citizensforsafetechnology.org

Our Legal Action       All Common Wealth Countries Citizens are welcome to join us!

It is not yet entirely clear to us, exactly how many civil litigations may be required in order for us to accomplish our objectives. For example, we know that Action(s) will be required against the Federal government respecting the offence of private money ownership via the Bank Act, and the offence of privatizing of national assets via another Act or Acts, all or some of which may enjoin various Ministries.

We also know we will be required in each province and territory to take Actions regarding the offence of denying private property ownership and protection of subsisting Crown Grants via the Land Titles Acts, and of course, Actions against the various Ministries, probably both provincial and federal, regarding the offence of the fraudulent creation and attachment of the registered names.

All of the above institutions or agencies serve in one way or another to enact and enforce statutes and by-laws that abrogate our fundamental natural human rights, contrary to the superior laws of the nation and the international treaties.

Now concurrent with all of the above, we will be taking action against each of the various provincial and federal law societies, the BAR associations and the appropriate Ministries of Justice, as the members of these organizations are complicit with the activities of the aforementioned institutions and agencies.

These court actions are designed to utilize the tools built into the system itself, to actually cause foundational and permanent change to that system, as it was originally designed to be. The result will be our freedom from the enslavement of the banker dominated money system, and to have a government that will be our servant and not our master, taking instructions from us, and not from the bankers.

As Canadians, we are being [criminally] deprived of our Patrimonial Entitlements, that being our right to freely enjoy our fair share of the natural wealth and resources of our nation, and therefore we are not only entitled, but we are morally obligated to take action aimed at stopping that deprivation. That is what our process is all about.

Our objective therefore, as you will find set out within all our information, is based on the unique premise that we believe we have finally come to understand the root cause of the legal and financial problems we all face, and how to fix it. So we intend to take action specifically aimed at eliminating that root cause, thereby permanently preventing any such future problems for everyone.

We are not attempting to cure or remedy an individual’s current legal or financial problems that often result from that root cause, as so many other remedies and processes have tried in the past, and are pointlessly continuing to try. This is what we hope our information will help you come to understand, and this is the goal we need people like you to be informed about and become involved in, and why we need you to help support us attain the objective of permanent changes to the root cause of all our problems.

We have a lawyer who has agreed to hand in his bar card(s) and help us take the legal action necessary to accomplish our objective which he understands to a degree that very few, if any, in the legal profession do.

In conclusion, let us quote from a recent e-mail from this lawyer,

“I need every single one of you on board to justify my stepping away from my practice and making such a potentially explosive application to the superior courts. And all of you certainly need me (or another competent lawyer willing to sacrifice his “legal” career) to properly handle this action…. We can [and will] win this, but to win a case of this scope and nature will not be easy, fast, or inexpensive.  Even as the sizable group we are, this will still be very much a ‘David & Goliath’ battle.”

Join us! www.humanrightsdefendersleague.ca

1 hour webinar below

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/globalfactradio/2013/07/05/conscious-living-guest-wally-dove-action-suit-against-canada

ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS

“Human rights defender” is a term used to describe people who, individually or with others, act to promote or protect human rights. Human rights defenders are identified above all by what they do and it is through a description of their actions (section A below) and of some of the contexts in which they work (section B below) that the term can best be explained.  The examples given of the activities of human rights defenders are not an exhaustive list.

A. What do human rights defenders do?

1. All human rights for all

To be a human rights defender, a person can act to address any human right (or rights) on behalf of individuals or groups. Human rights defenders seek the promotion and protection of civil and political rights as well as the promotion, protection and realization of economic, social and cultural rights.

Human rights defenders address any human rights concerns, which can be as varied as, for example, summary executions, torture, arbitrary arrest and detention, female genital mutilation, discrimination, employment issues, forced evictions, access to health care, and toxic waste and its impact on the environment. Defenders are active in support of human rights as diverse as the rights to life, to food and water, to the highest attainable standard of health, to adequate housing, to a name and a nationality, to education, to freedom of movement and to non-discrimination.  They sometimes address the rights of categories of persons, for example women’s rights, children’s rights, the rights of indigenous persons, tthe rights of refugees and internally displaced persons, and the rights of national, linguistic or sexual minorities.

2. Human rights everywhere

Human rights defenders are active in every part of the world: in States that are divided by internal armed conflict as well as States that are stable; in States that are non-democratic as well as those that have a strong democratic practice; in States that are developing economically as well as those that are classified as developed. They seek to promote and protect human rights in the context of a variety of challenges, including HIV/AIDS, development, migration, structural adjustment policies and political transition.

 


 

3. Local, national, regional and international action

The majority of human rights defenders work at the local or national level, supporting respect for human rights within their own communities and countries. In such situations, their main counterparts are local authorities charged with ensuring respect for human rights within a province or the country as a whole. However, some defenders act at the regional or international level. They may, for example, monitor a regional or worldwide human rights situation and submit information to regional or international human rights mechanisms, including the special rapporteurs of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights and United Nations treaty bodies.  Increasingly, the work of human rights defenders is mixed, with the focus being on local and national human rights issues, but with defenders making contact with regional and international mechanisms which can support them in improving human rights in their countries.

4. Collecting and disseminating information on violations

Human rights defenders investigate, gather information regarding and report on human rights violations. They may, for example, use lobbying strategies to draw their reports to the attention of the public and of key political and judicial officials to ensure that their investigative work is given consideration and that human rights violations are addressed. Most commonly, such work is conducted through human rights organizations, which periodically publish reports on their findings. However, information may also be gathered and reported by an individual focusing on one specific instance of human rights abuse.

5. Supporting victims of human rights violations

A very large proportion of the activities of human rights defenders can be characterized as action in support of victims of human rights violations. Investigating and reporting on violations can help end ongoing violations, prevent their repetition and assist victims in taking their cases to courts. Some human rights defenders provide professional legal advice and represent victims in the judicial process. Others provide victims with counseling and rehabilitation support.

6. Action to secure accountability and to end impunity

Many human rights defenders work to secure accountability for respect for human rights legal standards. In its broadest sense, this might involve lobbying authorities and advocating greater efforts by the State to implement the international human rights obligations it has accepted by its ratification of international treaties.  In more specific instances, the focus on accountability can lead human rights defenders to bear witness, either in a public forum (for example, a newspaper) or before a court or tribunal, to human rights violations that have already occurred. In this way, defenders contribute to securing justice on behalf of victims in specific cases of human rights violation and to breaking patterns of impunity, thereby preventing future violations. A significant number of defenders, frequently through organizations established for the purpose, focus exclusively on ending impunity for violations. The same groups of defenders might also work to strengthen the State’s capacity to prosecute perpetrators of violations, for example by providing human rights training for prosecutors, judges and the police.

7. Supporting better governance and government policy

Some human rights defenders focus on encouraging a Government as a whole to fulfill its human rights obligations, for example by publicizing information on the Government’s record of implementation of human rights standards and monitoring progress made. Some defenders focus on good governance, advocating in support of democratization and an end to corruption and the abuse of power, and providing training to a population on how to vote and why their participation in elections is important.

8. Contributing to the implementation of human rights treaties

Human rights defenders make a major contribution, particularly through their organizations, to the material implementation of international human rights treaties. Many non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and intergovernmental organizations help to establish housing, health care and sustainable income-generation projects for poor and marginalized communities. They offer training in essential skills and provide equipment such as computers to give communities improved access to information. This group merits particular attention as its members are not always described as human rights defenders and they themselves may not use the term “human rights” in a description of their work, focusing instead on terms such as “health”, “housing” or “development” which reflect their area of activity. Indeed, many of these activities in support of human rights are described in general terms as development action. Many NGOs and United Nations bodies fall within these categories. Their work, as much as that of other human rights defenders, is central to respect for and protection and achievement of human rights standards, and they need and deserve the protection given to their activities by the Declaration on human rights defenders.

9. Human rights education and training

A further major action undertaken by human rights defenders is the provision of human rights education. In some instances, education activities take the form of training for the application of human rights standards in the context of a professional activity, for example by judges, lawyers, police officers, soldiers or human rights monitors. In other instances, education may be broader and involve teaching about human rights in schools and universities or disseminating information on human rights standards to the general public or to vulnerable populations.  In summary, gathering and disseminating information, advocacy and the mobilization of public opinion are often the most common tools used by human rights defenders in their work. As described in this section, however, they also provide information to empower or train others. They participate actively in the provision of the material means necessary to make human rights a reality—building shelter, providing food, strengthening development, etc. They work at democratic transformation in order to increase the participation of people in the decision-making that shapes their lives and to strengthen good governance. They also contribute to the improvement of social, political and economic conditions, the reduction of social and political tensions, the building of peace, domestically and internationally, and the nurturing of national and international awareness of human rights.

B. Who can be a human rights defender?

There is no specific definition of who is or can be a human rights defender.  The Declaration on human rights defenders refers to “individuals, groups and associations … contributing to … the effective elimination of all violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms of peoples and individuals”.  In accordance with this broad categorization, human rights defenders can be any person or group of persons working to promote human rights, ranging from intergovernmental organizations based in the world’s largest cities to individuals working within their local communities.  Defenders can be of any gender, of varying ages, from any part of the world and from all sorts of professional or other backgrounds. In particular, it is important to note that human rights defenders are not only found within NGOs and intergovernmental organizations but might also, in some instances, be government officials, civil servants or members of the private sector.

PUBLIC NOTICE

Thursday, March 7, 2013

CANADA IS DISSOLVED!!!

A Legal Notice to all Agents of the so-called Crown of England and Elizabeth

Windsor, and to all Canadians

Issued by the Governing Council of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and

State

This PUBLIC NOTICE is issued to the Members of the Parliament of Canada, the

Canadian judiciary, the governmental civil service, and the active serving

members of all Canadian police and military forces, as well as to all citizens of

Canada:

1. On February 25, 2013, a lawfully constituted Common Law Court of Justice found Elizabeth

Windsor, Queen of England and Head of State of Canada and its churches, guilty as charged of

Crimes against Humanity in Canada and of engaging in a Criminal Conspiracy to conceal

Genocide. The same verdict found Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper guilty of the

same offenses.

2. This verdict was based on irrefutable evidence, including eyewitness accounts of Elizabeth

Windsor's personal involvement in the forcible abduction and disappearance of ten children

from the Kamloops Indian Residential School on October 10, 1964, while on a state visit to

Canada. Ms. Windsor has never denied or refuted this charge or evidence, nor did she respond

to a Public Summons issued by the Court.

3. The Court's verdict rests upon the Nuremberg Legal Statutes of 1950 which allow any head

of state to be tried for Crimes against Humanity, as well as the right under Canadian law to

hold the Crown liable for tort offenses committed in Canada.

4. Elizabeth Windsor therefore stands condemned as a convicted felon. As a fugitive from

justice, she is now liable for arrest and imprisonment under the terms of the Court verdict. A

Citizens Arrest Warrant for the detention of Elizabeth Windsor was in fact issued by the Court

on March 5, 2013, and Ms. Windsor has evaded this Warrant.

5. a) Each of you has taken a public oath of allegiance to Elizabeth Windsor as the Queen of

England. Your oath now constitutes a criminal act under international law, including Section

25 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which obligates all citizens to

refrain from colluding with authorities engaged in or convicted of criminal acts.

b) Each of you is obligated therefore to refrain from aiding or abetting Elizabeth Windsor in

evading justice or arrest, including by continuing to obey her orders or operating under her

authority, since to do so will constitute an obstruction of justice and will make you subject to

arrest.

6. Since no convicted felon can legitimately or legally serve as a head of state or a constituted

authority, all existing legal and political authority in Canada is dissolved as of Monday,

February 25, 2013. Your Oath of Allegiance to Queen Elizabeth and the Crown of England is

consequently nullified and abolished, along with your authority.

7. a) Canada has been rendered as a state without legitimate legal or political authority. It will

remain so until a new and lawful Head of State can be established along with a Constitution

democratically established by the people of Canada.

b) Until such constitutional authority is established, no existing Canadian law or statute is

enforceable, and any attempt by you or others to do so will constitute an act of illegal assault

and fraud on the people of Canada.

8. Until a legitimate government is established in Canada, all of its citizens are urged to

conduct themselves under the common law requirement of peaceable co-existence and equity

in their communities, maintaining law and order. All citizens are required to police and

govern themselves without reference to any existing authorities or laws, which are nullified,

illegitimate and inoperative.

9. Canadian citizens as wholly self-governing men and women are advised to establish local

committees of correspondence to arrange a National Congress that will draft a new

Constitution. This legal charter, ratified by a popular vote, will establish and maintain a new,

Democratic Republic of Canada.

10. This Constitution must include a new legal framework by which the church organizations

also convicted by the Court - the Vatican and Catholic, Anglican and United Church - can

legitimately and lawfully operate in Canada, if such further operation is the will of the People.

In accordance with the Verdict of the Court and lawful legitimacy, this new framework would

require a Civil Constitution for the Clergy that nationalizes the property and wealth of the

convicted church corporations, and regulates their church officials and employees as licensed

public servants.

We are informing the world of these facts and of the new regime now operating in Canada.

This same Notice and condition applies to the government and people of England, to whom a

separate Notice is being issued.

Copies of the Common Law Court's Verdict and Citizens Arrest Warrant can be found at

www.itccs.org - This Notice is issued globally in consultation with the Legal Commission of

the ITCCS (Brussels-London-New York)

7 March, 2013

....................

NOTICE

This Document can be used as a Legal Instrument by the signed Bearer to uphold his or her

status as a freeborn man or woman in the territory of Canada who is not subject to any

authority save as a Citizen of a democratically constituted Republic of Canada

_________________________

Signature of Citizen

___________________

Date

..................................................................................

These Persons have been convicted by the International Common

Law Court of Justice of committing Crimes against Humanity and

Children

Elizabeth Windsor: GUILTY of abducting ten children on October 10, 1964 from the

Kamloops Indian residential school, all of whom vanished

Joseph Ratzinger: GUILTY of ordering the coverup of child rape and torture by Catholic

priests, and of destroying evidence of Genocide by his church

Stephen Harper: GUILTY of lowering the mandatory sentence for child rape in Canada to

ONE YEAR, and of covering up the Murder of Indian children

An International Citizen Arrest Warrant has been issued against these guilty

persons - YOU ARE OBLIGATED to aid in the detention and public banning of

these criminals and their organizations

CONTACT The Court's Sheriff's Office C/O itccscentral@gmail.com

Posted by The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State - Brussels -

4/3/2013 - www.itccs.org

Canadian Human Rights Defenders League Legal actions!

Civil Litigations

It is not yet entirely clear to us, exactly how many civil litigations may be required in order for us to accomplish our objectives. For example, we know that Action(s) will be required against the Federal government respecting the offence of private money ownership via the Bank Act, and the offence of privatizing of national assets via another Act or Acts, all or some of which may enjoin various Ministries. We also know we will be required in each province and territory to take Actions regarding the offence of denying private property ownership and protection of subsisting Crown Grants via the Land Titles Acts, and of course, Actions against the various Ministries, probably both provincial and federal, regarding the offence of the fraudulent creation and attachment of the registered names. All of the above institutions or agencies serve in one way or another to enact and enforce statutes and by-laws that abrogate our fundamental natural human rights, contrary to the superior laws of the nation and the international treaties.

Provincial and Federal Actions

Now concurrent with all of the above, we will be taking action against each of the various provincial and federal law societies, the BAR associations and the appropriate Ministries of Justice, as the members of these organizations are complicit with the activities of the aforementioned institutions and agencies. These court actions are designed to utilize the tools built into the system itself, to actually cause foundational and permanent change to that system, as it was originally designed to be. The result will be our freedom from the enslavement of the banker dominated money system, and to have a government that will be our servant and not our master, taking instructions from us, and not from the bankers. As Canadians, we are being [criminally] deprived of our Patrimonial Entitlements, that being our right to freely enjoy our fair share of the natural wealth and resources of our nation, and therefore we are not only entitled, but we are morally obligated to take action aimed at stopping that deprivation. That is what our process is all about.

Objective

Our objective therefore, as you will find set out within all our information, is based on the unique premise that we believe we have finally come to understand the root cause of the legal and financial problems we all face, and how to fix it. So we intend to take action specifically aimed at eliminating that root cause, thereby permanently preventing any such future problems for everyone. We are not attempting to cure or remedy an individual’s current legal or financial problems that often result from that root cause, as so many other remedies and processes have tried in the past, and are pointlessly continuing to try. This is what we hope our information will help you come to understand, and this is the goal we need people like you to be informed about and become involved in, and why we need you to help support us attain the objective of permanent changes to the root cause of all our problems.
We have a lawyer who has agreed to hand in his bar card(s) and help us take the legal action necessary to accomplish our objective which he understands to a degree that very few, if any, in the legal profession do. In conclusion, let us quote from a recent e-mail from this lawyer,
"I need every single one of you on board to justify my stepping away from my practice and making such a potentially explosive application to the superior courts. And all of you certainly need me (or another competent lawyer willing to sacrifice his "legal" career) to properly handle this action.... We can [and will] win this, but to win a case of this scope and nature will not be easy, fast, or inexpensive. Even as the sizable group we are, this will still be very much a 'David & Goliath' battle." sign up here: www.humanrightsdefendersleague.ca  (Join the actions Tami )
 
Immigration Watch Canada & Obama Muslim? Jan 5/15 Print E-mail
Monday, 05 January 2015 15:28

Immigration Watch Canada & mgr view points! #6 May 31/14

Muslim Obama must watch? 9 min

Fox News was going to air on a Sunday night  about Obama.
To see why it got pulled before it could air, watch the segment below.
This piece was pulled off the air.
I encourage you to watch and please send this to everyone on your email list ASAP.
Obama Puts Heat on Fox News to Prevent Sean Hannity from airing this piece.
The following is the video that Sean Hannity of FOX News has been trying to show. The internet
picked it up. Watch it now before it gets pulled from the internet!

This is well said!  At last a Prime Minister with guts.

The rest of the world could take a lesson from him.

Hats off to Monsieur Fillon!!!

Prime Minister of France

For once, a French politician has the courage to say out loud
what the French think and sometimes cry out about.

Interesting approach?
Learning to live in peace and harmony ?

Muslims who want to live under the law of the 'Islamic Sharia' have recently been told to leave France in order to guard against possible terrorist attacks, the government has targeted radicals.

Apparently, the Prime Minister, Francois Fillon has angered
some French Muslims in stating:

THOSE IMMIGRANTS, WHO ARE NOT FRENCH MUST ADAPT.

Take it or leave it, I am tired of this nation worrying about
whether we are offending some individual or their culture.
Our culture has developed with struggles and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.

Our official language is French, not Spanish, or Lebanese, or Arabic, or Chinese, or Japanese, or any other language. 
Therefore, if you want to be part of our society, learn the language!


Most French people believe in God. This is not some Christian obligation, influence by the rightists or political pressure, but it is a fact, because men and women founded this nation on Christian principles, and this is clearly documented.

It is then appropriate to display this on the walls of our schools? ? If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your home, because God is part of our culture.

We will accept your beliefs without question.
All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in peaceful harmony with us. 
This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, AND OUR LIFESTYLE. 
And we offer you the opportunity to enjoy all this. 
But if you're tired of our flag, our commitment, our Christian beliefs, or our lifestyle,I strongly encourage you to take advantage of another great French freedom,
THE RIGHT TO LEAVE.
If you are not happy here then LEAVE.
We did not force you to come here.
You asked to be here.
So accept the country YOU chose. 

(Perhaps if we circulate this email to the world's citizens
we may find a way to stand up and spread the same truths)

...Well said Mr. Fillon!!!!! (I strongly suggest our new government do the same for our sovereignty and security Tami)

Folks this is how disturbed Canadian Immigrants treat White Canadian citizens that makes no sense at all? Videos to follow to confirm my statements.

Catherine Keys < princey2828@gmail.com >

First name:         Catherine
Last name:         Keys
E-mail:         princey2828@gmail.com
City:         Surrey
Choose all applicable:          Is this a media inquiry?
Message:         The fact that a genocide is taking place in Gaza and no mention on any of these money begging nesara sites absolutely says it all. 

Evil can only exist when good men do and say nothing. (no mention of Canadian crimes in Canada)

Gigs up the world is AWAKE and watching and we have spoken. Human life before anything even money and power which eliminates yourself interest.

Folks I wish to add that our government claim to help other people around the world is simply a smoke screen to cover the fact that they are after their birth accounts to financial feed their parasitic programming. They use this birth account to pay the banker fraud conversion agenda as well as their stock market usury funds for many applications to be exposed after Nesara announcements.(as well as corrupt our electoral system) A fair respectful constructive government would make sure all their citizens were employed have safe homes, educated and healed to empower the success of their own citizens and country first. They would also ask permission from their Citizens for any immigration changes. From there a welcoming strong country can then support only the right amount of immigrants that serves everyone's highest good. Muslim Sharia law does not serve anyone's highest good in Canada and violates our laws.

Immigrants from Muslim countries do nothing to enhance our society for Canadians in fact they create unnecessary drama from non compatible thinking and our government should be charged with treason for there treasonous policies in this regard including university puppets. Shariah Law is not wanted or needed in Canada. Tami  see news clip below

http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid2310914278001?bckey=AQ~~%2cAAAAybGjzqk~%2c6NfTc6c241HpkjjX4AvOQfyjXRJdaCi4&bclid=0&bctid=3064143715001

Sharia Law Finance in North America?

http://youtu.be/L7iHxl90CD0

VIDEO FROM PARIS THAT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN IN THE U.S.A. YET

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplayer/cbnplayer.swf?aid=17933

 

What Kind of Government Do You Want?

Here's little something to look at during this political season. This ought to make a person think one more time before walking into the voting booth. This country is returning to it's constitution, as a part of this money shift.

http://www.wimp.com/thegovernment/

Friends do you know that your treacherous manipulative government have given immigrants benefits:

Benefits to purchase property over Canadians?

Benefits to develop businesses over Canadians?

Benefits to get education training over Canadians?

Benefits to get job training over Canadians?

Benefits to get jobs over Canadians ( ads Mandarin and Cantonese speaking only this should be made illegal) They outright lie about Canadians not wanting to do the work while discriminating!

Benefits to get subsidized housing over Canadians

Benefits for free furniture household goods to get settled not shared publicly for Canadians!

Benefit to our tax dollars over Canadians! Elderly and Veterans thinking of filing for refugee status to get support! If you are wondering why there is human rights class action against all levels of government this is just one major issue behind these actions. (Cafr and bank of Canada fraud)

Benefits to immigrants and foreign countries over Canadians and indigenous peoples! They say Canadians don’t qualify for EI they pay into if they quit their jobs but refugees and foreigners get our tax dollars. These people need to be charged and arrested for treason also due to Cafr fraud in all levels of government. This is what Justin Trudeau meant when he said the budget will balance itself arrogantly shared via media campaign.

We need to take our country back and stop all immigration to Canada. Plus we need to start mass deportations for many reasons to be shared publicly. Check the numbers on the detriments to continue to allow unfettered and unnecessary immigration to this country do not let the media fool you. After receiving a very treasonous misguided email from local city councilor who is an immigrant it is clear we need to re-evaluate immigrant participation in our government.

There is a new movement across Canada due to the many betrayals by our government against their own citizens regarding immigration and foreign policies called Canada First to take back our sovereignty and values of this country. We are the people and the power. NO such immigration policies should happen in Canada without our permission and honestly informed choices with votes. In Vancouver it is immigrants against white Canadian born citizens in any situation where immigrants numbers are high with rental , job or money issues I have personally experienced.

These disrespectful immigration policies now has a huge underground and reverse discrimination economy thriving in Vancouver supported by immigration groups who we need to investigate and find out who is paying them and where their money is going. This thrives because the government does not demand respect for our two languages but fosters disrespect to them catering once again with our tax dollars without our permission. How does millions of salary and business funds going out of the country help Canadians and our economy ponder upon this please.

See 80 poll questions on this website www.galacticfriends.com left hand side of page Check www.immigrationwatchcanada.org

Blessings in Truth Tami Dickson

Home

Immigration Watch Canada is an organization of Canadians who believe that immigration has to serve the interests of its own citizens. It cannot be turned into a social assistance / job-findingprogram for people from  other countries. It should never be a social engineering experiment that is conducted on Canada’s mainstream population in order to make it a minority. **

But immigration has become those 2 things.

Why? In particular, why has Canada’s average 250,000 per year immigration intake remained in place for over 23 years?

The answer is that all of Canada’s major political parties have adopted the arrogant and contemptuous attitude that they know what is best for Canadians and that Canadians do not have to be consulted when major policy decisions are made.

These politicians imply that the primary purpose of immigration is to help people in other countries, whether this help is to protect them from persecution or from unemployment. These politicians also imply that their position is morally superior to that of many Canadians (particularly those who have been negatively affected by immigration), and that those people should be silenced.

They have also pretended that these policies are in the interest of Canada. But, in reality, as most Canadians can see, the policies are intended solely to help each of the political parties get a share of the immigrant vote.

This shameless immigration betrayal of Canada and the promotion of political party self-interest began in 1990 when one political party (the Progressive Conservatives) increased immigration levels to 250,000 per year. At the time they did this, they actually announced they were doing so in order to capture more of the immigrant vote. This may sound hard to believe because it is so brazen, but it is a fact. Since then, all other parties have adopted the same policy. All pretend that their actions are helping people in the rest of the world and that this immigration flood is also literally and figuratively enriching Canadian society.

 


The reality is that Canada’s average 250,000 per year immigration intake since 1990 has been far too high. In fact, Canada’s intake is the highest per capita in the world. And it has obviously been destructive and senseless.

What are some examples of the destruction and senselessness?

Our high intake has had major negative economic consequences for Canadians who are looking for work. In fact, it has forced many of Canada’s own unemployed to compete with immigrants for a limited number of jobs and it has impoverished many Canadians .

(Absurd as it may sound, some naive, employed Canadians have actually launched “Recognize Foreign Credentials”, “Cultural Diversity in the Workplace”, and  “Hire An Immigrant” campaigns to give immigrants that Canada never needed a hiring advantage over unemployed Canadian-born. And these hypocritical Canadians smugly believe they should be given awards for throwing their own fellow citizens under the bus.)

The destruction and senselessness  that naive Canadians (as well as those with sinister intentions) have created has caused many Canadians (especially those in Canada’s larger centres) to become very angry. These Canadians feel that this social engineering project has raised “Diversity” to the level of a national goal. They feel this amounts to the country being ethnically cleansed and re-colonized.

Finally, many Canadians see with their own eyes that Canada’s high intake has also turned many areas of the country into crowded, grid-locked, environmental disasters-in-progress—duplicates of the environmental catastrophes many recent immigrants come from.

We repeat one basic question :

Why Is Canada bringing in 250,000+ immigrants per year? Ottawa has never provided a logical answer to that question. In fact, it has pretended that current immigration is no different from past immigration. It has also  withheld vital information or tried to deceive Canadians by making false claims about the benefits of immigration.

We believe Canada should have some immigration, but that immigration levels should be reduced to about 25,000, that is, to about 10% of the current annual 250,000 intake. We advocate that  the 25,000 intake level should be kept in place indefinitely to compensate for the immigration disaster that has occurred in the past 23 years.

We also advocate a significant reduction to Canada’s Temporary Foreign Worker program which in 2012 allowed  a record 491,547  non-Canadians to work in Canada. The 491,547 consists of 213,573 new workers who entered Canada in 2012 plus another 277,974 who were already here. This program is being widely abused by employers and should probably be reduced to nearly zero. In any recession (this past one and others), it is madness  for a country to be importing large numbers of immigrants as well as large numbers of Temporary Foreign Workers.

In addition to a reduction of Canada’s immigration intake to 25,000 per year and a dramatic cut to Canada’s Temporary Foreign Worker program, we also call for major reform to many of Canada’s other immigration policies.  (See our Basics section for details.)

** For background on major immigration policy changes made in the 1960′s and 70′s, click on the following summaries of excellent research done by reporter Doug Collins in his book  “Immigration : The Destruction Of English Canada”  :

http://www.immigrationwatchcanada.org/2011/11/10/nov-10-2011-for-remembrance-day-doug-collins-immigration-the-destruction-of-english-canada/

http://www.immigrationwatchcanada.org/2011/11/17/nov-17-2011-canadians-never-wanted-to-change-the-character-of-their-country/

Last Updated on Monday, 05 January 2015 15:35
 
Racial Hiring, Immigration Myths & Degrade ISIS in Canada! Jan 5/15 Print E-mail
Monday, 05 January 2015 15:25

Racial Hiring, Immigration Myths & Degrade ISIS in Canada! Oct 12/14

Folks there are all kinds of discrimination. Sadly there is still a lot of ignorance about spiritual, gender, business and galactic matters on the planet. Many still scoff at our Residual income offer, galactic influences into our government business area which has much to do with mind control making absurd incorrect decisions about policies and people. For my issues people who continue to violate my rights in anyway due to these unconscious idiotic judgments my way will be charged I have had enough.  I have a legal team primed to take actions in Canada, USA and international if needed. If you want to continue to be criminal in your choices you will pay with a variety of measures even regarding immigration in Canada. There will be no amnesty or immunity contrary to criminal negotiations.! Tami

If It’s OK to Degrade ISIS in Iraq, Why Not Degrade It In Canada?

Canada’s Parliament has just voted to approve a 600 member Canadian combat mission in Iraq to counter the actions of ISIS.

It remains to be seen whether this will be a wise move or not.

As readers will see in the quotation below from a Muslim, a significant ISIS-Like presence already existed in Toronto 11 years ago . It is undoubtedly much larger today. So what is Canada’s Parliament going to do about that?

The Muslim population in Canada has increased very quickly. Unnecessary immigration from Muslim-dominated countries is the cause of that increase. In the period 2001 to 2011, Canada’s Muslim population went from 579,000 to more than 1 million. Unmonitored immigration from those countries is also the major cause of any increase in Canada’s ISIS-like supporters. In 2011, Toronto had the largest population of Muslims, at just over 424,900. Montréal had just over 221,000 and Vancouver about 73,200.

A dramatic cut in Canada’s overall immigration intake would go a long way to reducing the threat of ISIS in Canada. Once again, in sending a combat mission to Iraq, Canada is acting internationally when it should be acting domestically to clean its own house.

“IT WAS A COLD January morning in 2003 as I walked through ankle – deep icy snow into the Toronto Convention Centre. I was attending a conference of Muslims arranged by groups allied to the Saudi – based World Assembly of Muslim Youth – WAMY. The freezing temperature and frosty welcome I received at the hands of the young Islamists had not prepared me for the chilling lecture I was about to hear. The speaker, a Kuwaiti politician, said: “Western civilization is rotten from within and nearing collapse…it [the West] will continue to grow until an outside force hits it and you will be surprised at how quickly it falls.

“The crowd burst into applause. Just sixteen months beforehand, an “outside force” had hit the New York Twin Towers on 9/11, and here was Tareq Al Suwaidan, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood from Kuwait, rubbing salt into the wounds of the West. The audience of more than two thousand young Canadian Muslims, many of them associated with the Muslim Students Association (MSA), carefully segregated into male and female sections, listened in awe. Suwaidan used elaborate charts to draw projections about the impending collapse of the West. They lustily cheered the Kuwaiti Islamist as he predicted the doom of the very civilization these young men and women were living in.

“Why were these Muslim youth, (who were) born and educated in Canada, cheering the fall of the West? Did they not consider themselves to be part of the West? If they did, why would they be cheering its imminent collapse and who were they expecting to carry out the “outside force” attack? How could they, as citizens of a democratic Western country, allow a Kuwaiti politician to write the obituary of the West, but also cheer him on as he did so?”

← UBC Prof’s Evidence Damns Business Immigrant Programme

Preferential Hiring   (what I witnessed is immigrant discrimination rampant against white Canadians with our government help Tami)

The Pursuit of Division: Race, Gender and Preferential Hiring in Canada by Dr. Martin Loney, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1998

Dr. Martin Loney is the author of “The Pursuit of Division: Race, Gender and Preferential Hiring In Canada”, the most extensive study of Canada’s employment equity (known elsewhere as affirmative action) and preferential hiring policies. Dr. Loney shows that current policies which have affected the lives of thousands of Canadians were based on the idea that “systemic discrimination against visible minorities” existed in hiring in Canada’s workplaces.

He examines a large body of data and shows that the “systemic discrimination” claim is ideologically driven, and that a number of visible minority groups were actually in employment positions superior to those of the majority population. As groups, they were actually doing better economically. Other visible minorities were doing just as well. Although some visible minorities were doing poorly, the fact that this was happening did not show that “systemic discrimination” existed. It clearly did not demonstrate that there was a need for employment equity legislation which has resulted in race-based hiring throughout Canada’s public service and in Canada’s private sector. This campaign began in the late 1980′s, has permeated all three levels of government as well as the private sector, and continues today.

However, as Dr. Loney shows, the entire Employment Equity programme, so- named to elicit a programmed politically-correct response, should have been seriously questioned at the time it was being considered. It clearly should have been rejected because it is based on a selective use of statistics, not facts. Dr. Loney demonstrates that Canada’s Employment Equity programme has created inequity for a large number of Canadians because it is institutionalized discrimination against white males. He also asserts that this preferential hiring legislation is a major divisive force in Canadian society. Canada’s federal government should be pursuing policies of unity, not division.

The following is Dr. Philip Resnick’s brief review of “The Pursuit of Division”. Dr. Resnick is a professor of political science at the University of British Columbia and author of “Twenty-First Century Democracy”.

“In this explosive study of identity politics, Martin Loney argues that an improbable alliance of radical feminists, multicultural bureaucrats, and politicians chasing ethnic votes has produced a divisive political agenda at the expense of a shared Canadian community. He examines changes to government policies that have placed race and gender at the centre of Canadian discourse and shows that ‘fraudulent claims, nepotism, shoddy research, and self-serving rhetoric have propelled a politics of grievance’ to the detriment of those who really need government assistance, Canada’s poor.

“‘The Pursuit of Division’ is a well-researched and well-argued challenge to prevailing orthodoxy on equity politics and identity politics in Canada. Loney does an extremely effective job of debunking the selective approach to data that characterizes too much of the discourse in favour of preferential treatment and brings a long overdue comparative dimension to the discussion by situating the Canadian treatment of minorities within a global framework.”

www.immigrationwatch.com

IMMIGRATION MYTHS :

MYTH #1 :

Canada needs large numbers of immigrants because it will face massive shortages of skilled labour in the coming decades.

The facts:

There will be no such shortages if more Canadians acquire the needed skills, which can be accomplished if wages, government policies and other conditions encourage them to do so and the jobs are not filled by immigrants. With a few exceptions—such as the present and temporary shortage of medical workers—Canada has both the human resources and educational infrastructure to meet our skilled labour needs.

MYTH #2 :

Canada is sparsely populated and can support a much larger population.

The facts:

Despite Canada’s large surface area, much of it is not suited for human habitation. It would require a large input of food and energy for any significant number of people to live there and this would have both economic and environmental costs.

A large majority of recent immigrants have chosen to live in large cities, most notably Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, because of the wider range of social services, the higher quality of life, economic opportunities and the presence of relatives and immigrant communities in these locations.

This does not result in net benefits for most of the residents of these large cities and increases pressure on educational and health care facilities as well as adds to housing costs, commute times and environmental problems.

MYTH #3 :

With an aging population and lower fertility rates, Canada needs high levels of immigration to provide the workers and tax base required to support social services for retirees.

The facts:

While it is true Canadians are living longer and having fewer babies, research shows that immigration has almost no impact on offsetting the costs of an aging population. Immigrants themselves grow old and draw on social support services while on average they have families as small as those of other Canadians.

For immigrants to make a net contribution to the support of social services, they would have to pay more in taxes than they receive in benefits. In recent years this has not been the case as newcomers have usually earned substantially less than native-born Canadians and have drawn significantly more in social services than they have paid in taxes.

The only ways to deal with the effects of an aging population involve increases in productivity and raising the age of retirement to accord with improvements in the population’s health and longevity.

MYTH #4 :

 


High levels of immigration are required to ensure Canada’s prosperity.

The facts:

A country’s prosperity does not depend on a growing population or workforce. This is particularly true in the case of Canada since we are a trading nation and do not require an increasingly large domestic market to achieve economies of scale. Our prosperity depends rather on sound economic policies that stimulate productivity, make good use of capital investment and maximize the potential of the existing workforce.

This information was created by Canada’s Centre for Immigration Policy Reform (www.immigrationreform.ca). Their full set of 15  MYTHS is available on their web site.

Here is a previous bulletin which deals with five other Immigration Myths :

http://www.immigrationwatchcanada.org/2011/01/01/for-new-years-2011-five-immigration-myths-exposed/

UBC Prof’s Evidence Damns Business Immigrant Programme

Posted on September 28, 2014

UBC Prof’s Evidence Damns Business Immigrant Programme

1. Canada and other countries began giving immigration priority to Business Immigrants (BI’s) in the late 1970′s. In UBC Professor David Ley’s book, Millionaire Migrants”, he refers to the BI as “homo economicus”, that is, “economic man” whose economic capital was prized over the social/educational capital that many traditional immigrants had brought here. This new type of immigration indicated a change from permanent immigration to temporary and circular immigration.

2. Canada is one of 30 countries that have business immigrant programmes.

3. David Ley’s focus is on economic migrants who came from Asia, particularly Chinese from Hong Kong and Taiwan. Over 33 million Chinese have migrated to other countries, 7 million outside of Asia.

4. In 2001, 73% of Chinese Canadians lived in Toronto (410,000) and Vancouver (343,000), a result attributable in part to the BI programme.

5. Although Canada’s motive was to stimulate its economy, the motive of many of Vancouver’s BI’s was to get Canadian citizenship which they regarded as an “insurance policy” against Mainland China’s potential interference in Taiwan and Hong Kong.

6. Canada soon saw that its objectives and those of the Chinese BI’s were opposite. David Ley says : “Departure from the bull markets of East Asia to the slow if steady returns and high taxation of Canada was a dubious economic proposition, and migration was seen much more as an a project to maximize family objectives : geopolitical security, educational options for children, quality of life for the nuclear family and often (a better place for) ageing parents.” (P.26)

7. In 1988, Vancouver’s EXPO 86 lands (about one-sixth of Vancouver’s downtown area) were sold to Hong Kong billionaire Li Kashing at a bargain price. He had been involved in property purchases in Vancouver and other Canadian cities on a small scale in the late 1960′s. David Ley says that in the same year, David Lam was appointed Lieutenant Governor of B.C. This was a very clear symbolic counterpart to the sale of the Expo lands and a clear signal to Asia that B.C. was open to entrepreneurs. (P.55)

8. Between 1980 and 2008. about 400,000 immigrants entered Canada through the BIP. Canada’s high BIP numbers are attributable to how easy it was to enter Canada. (BI’s had to get only 35 points to satisfy immigration requirements compared to 67 for skilled immigrants). (Pp.58-59)

9. Between 1980 and 2001, most immigrants (about 78%) went to three areas : Toronto–40%; Montreal–14%; Vancouver–14.2% Most refugees went to Toronto (35.8%) and Montreal (18.5%). Only 7.0% went to Vancouver. (P.60)

10. Language inability is correlated with failure : 57% of BI’s could not speak French or English, compared to 44% of all immigrants.

11. Korean entrepreneurs were more successful than the Hong Kong and Taiwanese groups because they worked in non-ethnic areas. (P.111) Vancouver and Richmond entrepreneurs recorded the weakest performance because they competed with one another. Their experience confirmed European experience where “breaking-out” of the enclave was seen as a necessity for success. (P.112)

11. Surveys showed that relatively few BI’s (62%) were planning to work here, thus subverting government objectives. This compared to 76% of all immigrants and 85% of skilled workers. Hong Kong, Taiwan, China and South Korea accounted for most of BI’s to Toronto (58%), Montreal (54%), and Vancouver (80%). Most South Koreans came as entrepreneurs. Vancouver took 15,000 more BI’s than Toronto between 1980 and 2001. This was to cause significant increases in Vancouver’s housing market, and make most housing unaffordable. (P.63)

12. A national panel study of more than 12,000 immigrants who landed in 2000-2001 found that 37% of BI’s in Vancouver had purchased single family housing within 6 months, compared with 17% for other immigrants and refugees. (P.64).

13. Canada’s senior immigration officer in Hong Kong incorrectly described Business Immigrants as immigrants landing on their feet running. (Pp.64-65)

14. Ottawa boasted about all of the money that BI’s brought with them : from 1986 to 2005, $8.7 Billion had been registered in subscriptions and about 25,000 jobs maintained or created. It would not be long before officials suspected that the job creation numbers were inflated. About $27 Billion was brought to the Vancouver area in the years 1988 to 1997. (P.70) Huge inflows of billions arrived at banks. (P.71) BI’s sought ways to put money into safe places in order to avoid taxes. Peter Newman’s book, “Titans”, portrayed Asian BI’s as success stories. The Vancouver Sun ran abridged segments of Newman’s book on its front pages. David Bond of the Hong Kong -Shanghai Bank of Canada boasted that if he were the czar of immigration, he would send a fleet of Boeing 747′s to Hong Kong to pick up BI’s. All of this hype was false. Ottawa assumed that these people would be revealing their assets and that it would be receiving significant revenue from Business Immigrants, but that did not happen.

15. In fact, a senior Citizenship and Immigration manager said that gov’ts did not know if the BIP was working—-even after 15 years. (P.108)

16. Many BI immigrants were cheated by immigration consultants. Ottawa knew about this, but did nothing for 24 to 25 years. In 2004, it required consultants to organize themselves into a self-regulating association. “Among the paradoxes of the BIP is how a programme so revered by senior governments has contributed so much anguish among its clients.” (P.120)

17. David Ley conducted two surveys of BI’s. The first was on 24 immigrants. The second was on 90. The results did not flatter the programmes. A large number of BI’s did not file tax returns because they were no longer here. They had satisfied minimal requirements and then left to pursue better opportunities elsewhere. Another study by Marger did a panel study of 70 entrepreneurs in the early 1990′s. Seven years later, half of his panel had disappeared. The majority of the missing were from East Asia.

18. Australia and New Zealand have recorded similar outcomes. Quality of life and better educational opportunities for their children were considered more important than satisfying government objectives.

19. Ottawa tried to introduce laws requiring all Canadians to disclose assets, particularly those being held offshore, but a lobby developed among millionaire migrants in Vancouver, not among WASP lawyers in Toronto, to oppose such legislation. The Chinese lobby was supported by the Glen Clark NDP government in B.C. and by the federal Liberals. By 1998, after China had re-taken Hong Kong and fear of China had eased, investor and entrepreneur immigration from Hong Kong and Taiwan had fallen by 94% and 78% respectively. Many wanted to keep their offshore assets secret in order not to pay their share of taxes. British Columbia MLA Jenny Kwan stated that “the Chinese are very private with their money. This law goes against our culture,” implying that the Chinese should be allowed to operate in Canada by a separate set of rules !! (P.96)

20. Between 1987 and 1997, Hong Kong had been the largest source of immigrants to Canada, reaching 30,000+ per year. However, after 1997, this number fell to 2000 per year. (Pp.73-74) Ottawa’s foreign assets disclosure laws and the Asian Financial crisis that began in 1997 were two important reasons. (P.77)

21. David Ley says ” The economic circumstances of immigrants among the ethnic Chinese population in Canada have been poor. Tax returns in 2000 showed average incomes of $15,000, half the average for the entire population. BI’s reported even lower incomes, around $13,000 with many households declaring incomes below the official poverty line.

22. Entrepreneurs had to show success within two years. They were supposed to be monitored by officials every 6 months. Such monitoring often did not occur, but Ottawa allowed them to stay. To avoid not staying in Canada for the required time each year, business immigrants would go to the U.S., fly to Asia and later return to the U.S. and enter Canada without the perusal of immigration authorities. Many immigrants paid consultants to remove immigration requirements for them and later acquired citizenship illegitimately. CIC was aware of hundreds of cases of fraud, but did little.

23. By the late 1980′s, 50,000 to 60,000 Canadian university graduates worked in HK. Other estimates said that over 200,000 Hong Kong residents held Canadian passports. (P.226) For many HK’ers, return is a distinct possibility; for some, an intended probability. David Ley says that a 2007 study by the Chinese-Canadian Historical Society of B.C. includes the startling estimate that two thirds of Chinese-Canadian males with Canadian citizenship but of Hong Kong origin, and between the ages of 25 and 44, live and work outside of Canada. (P.92)

24. Price Waterhouse reviewed the entrepreneur and self-employed streams in 1989 and found that over half of its list who had landed in the past 2 to 3 years did not respond. Of the other half interviewed, only half were meeting the requirements while only 35% of these businesses were profitable. The consultants concluded that the annual BI scorecard was significantly inflated. In 1992, Ernst and Young concluded that the Investor Immigrant programme exaggerated by three times its actual employment benefits. In 1999, a senior forensic auditor from the World Bank told CIC that its Investor programme contained systemic corruption. It was “a massive sham. The middlemen made hundreds of millions of dollars….Claims about the benefits of the programme in terms of job creation and investment have been widely inflated.” A CIC administrator said that the availability of large capital funds and weak supervision led to “a feeding frenzy, driven by provincial corruption and hungry lawyers, a very dirty programme that brought out the worst in our legal and business group”. (P.121)

25, Smelling money, CIC Department employees left to become immigration consultants.

← Immigration Has Caused Vancouver’s Astronomic Housing Prices

Last Updated on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 16:34
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 58