Free newsletter

Site Manager

Tami Dickson

Follow Us

Follow Unittus

Custom Search
Vaccine Dangers,Gardisal & GMO Corn Nov 3/11 Print E-mail
Wednesday, 02 November 2011 16:33

Vaccine Dangers,Gardisal & GMO Corn Nov 3/11

Documentary  -  The Greater Good -  ???????   Exposing the vaccination propaganda by “the industry and its profiteering pinions”, the lack of safety research, refusal to accept adverse effects reports from parents as relevant and real,  “Science by DECLARATION” rather than based on OBSERVABLE FACTS, dismissing related illness as merely “coincidental and irrelevant”…….

Important! The producers of this powerful film are allowing a full and FREE preview through November 5th! Please tell everyone you know to watch this film in its entirety through November 5th, 2011.
Please support THE GREATER GOOD's Community Engagement Campaign by purchasing a Limited Edition DVD for only $10!   Click
HERE to purchase a copy to show your support!

Worse than Bad Advice - This Can Lead to Seizures, Paralysis, Blindness, and Death

Watch the full length documentary

"THE GREATER GOOD looks behind the fear, hype and politics that have polarized the vaccine debate in America today.

Beware of Danger

The film re-frames the emotionally charged issue and offers, for the first time, the opportunity for a rational and scientific discussion on how to create a safer and more effective vaccine program."

This film recently received the 2nd annual "Koroni Award for a documentary feature addressing an issue of importance to public health" at the Sidewalk Film Festival.

It also received the Cinematic Vision Award at the 2011 Amsterdam Film Festival.

From my point of view, this film couldn't be more timely and if you have any interest in the vaccine controversy is a must see.

I sincerely hope you will share this article with family, close friends and social networks while free viewing of the film is still available, and urge everyone you know to take the time to watch it.

Barbara Loe Fisher summarizes the purpose of the film rather succinctly when she says that the issue of vaccines, "has become so polarized—you're either pro-vaccine or you're anti-vaccine.

When you take a centrist position, like the National Vaccine Information Center, you are automatically put into the category of being anti-vaccine.

But the truth is, we're just trying to make vaccine policies and vaccines safer."

Individual Rights versus Politics

The Greater Good "weaves together the stories of families whose lives have been forever changed by vaccination," and shows how modern medicine, especially when driven by politics and big business, can rob you of some of your most basic rights.  The results of such politically- and financially-driven policies - can be devastating and one movie reviewer, who saw the groundbreaking documentary, commented:

Dr. Mercola Recommends...

Every "Like" Helps Support This Cause

"What's being said is staggering, especially if you don't know too much about the science of, and politics behind, vaccines." - LA Weekly

But this film is focused on analyzing what can be done to create positive change and reduce irrational fears so parents and doctors can work together to minimize vaccine risks vaccine risks to individuals and our population.

The film seeks to open the channels of communication between parents, doctors, and policy makers to listen and learn from each other in order to begin a rational discussion about vaccine safety.  After all, don't all of us want our kids to be healthy and safe from unnecessary harm?  In order to ensure the safety of as many children as possible, we cannot continue to ignore the signs that maybe we've taken vaccines as our primary disease prevention strategy too far; to the point that we're now seeing too many people being hurt.

Unlike many other TV programs and documentaries on this topic, The Greater Good takes care to acknowledge both doctors and scientists, who advocate for mass, mandatory vaccination policies as well as those, who question the science, policy and ethics of current vaccine policies.

From my point of view, there can be little doubt that we need to review the safety and effectiveness of the current vaccination program in the U.S., and this review needs to include methodologiclly sound investigative science.  If we don't do that now, we may not be able to stop further damage to the health of future generations of children.

Incomplete Science Shapes US Vaccination Policies

Public health officials have long insisted that vaccines are the best way to protect the public health.  As a result, the number of doses of vaccines included in the childhood vaccination schedule has tripled over the past 30 years, from 23 doses of seven different vaccines in 1980 to 69 doses of 16 different vaccines in 2010.

However, alongside the rise in administered vaccines, we've also seen a significant rise in children with chronic disease and disabilities.  For whatever reason, our kids are getting sicker.  Infant mortality has also risen.  In 1960, America ranked 12th in infant mortality among all nations of the world. By 2005, we ranked 30th.  Furthermore, more full term babies die before their first birthday in the US than in most European countries, and the US gives its infants more vaccines than any other country in the world.

So, could it all be a coincidence?

The truth is, we don't know.

No one has formally and independently studied the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children, and this is something that needs to be done not just for each individual vaccine, but also for multiple vaccine combinations.  The research is INCOMPLETE, and that is a major part of the problem.  How can you claim a pharmaceutical product like a vaccine is safe for everyone and that using multiple vaccines from day of birth throughout childhood is a wise public health policy when that policy has not been adequately studied? As a nation, the U.S. is gambling the health of its citizens on assumptions.

As stated in the film:

"The certainty is not scientific."

Vaccines are currently approved based on the research submitted to the government by the drug companies that have developed the new vaccine and funded the pre-licensure studies.  Many of the studies drug companies conduct do not use true placebos and have only a few hundred or a few thousand healthy people enrolled, who do not match the health profile of the millions of people told to get the vaccine after it is licensed.  The safety of vaccine policies are primarily based on the word of the companies that produce and profit from vaccines and enjoy a liability shield from vaccine injury lawsuits in civil court that was given to them by Congress and the Supreme Court.

Is this wise?

Furthermore, the mass vaccination program takes a one-size-fits-all strategy approach.  It does not acknowledge that we are all individuals with different predispositions and health status, which can play a significant role in how we react to vaccines or prescription drugs.  For example, research by Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride indicates that children with compromised gut flora are particularly prone to vaccine damage.

Currently there is almost no individual screening done by most doctors to assess whether an individual is at high risk for having a vaccine reaction that can end in serious health problems or even death.  Wouldn't it make sense to do everything possible to minimize vaccine risks?  After all, while increasing numbers of parents opt to delay vaccinations or opt out of vaccines for their children, there are many parents who want to vaccinate their children and they deserve to have confidence that everything possible is being done to minimize vaccine risks for their child..

Being able to easily and inexpensively decrease a child's chances of experiencing an adverse reaction should be embraced and encouraged by all health officials and doctors rather than conveniently dismissing the legitimate vaccine safety concerns of parents as "anti-vaccine" and "anti-establishment."

Why We Should Urge Our Daughters to Be One Less Victim of Gardasil

In 2006, Merck released Gardasil, a vaccine designed to protect young girls and women against being infected with four strains of human papillomavirus (HPV).  The idea was that if HPV infection , which is cleared asymptomatically within two years by more than 90 percent of those who get it, is that HPV associated cervical cancers in women would be prevented.

One of the three vaccine injury cases featured in The Greater Good movie is that of Gabi Swank, a 15-year-old honor student who decided to get the Gardasil vaccine after seeing a "Be One Less" Gardasil vaccine advertisement on TV.  Like so many young girls, she wasn't warned about any possible side effects when she got the shots, which are given as a series of three injections.

Gabi is now a Gardasil injury statistic, a young girl permanently disabled by the vaccine.

At the time the documentary was filmed, she had already suffered two strokes and experienced partial paralysis.   She also lost part of her vision and today suffers frequent seizures.  When she was in high school, many days she had to use a wheelchair to get around school due to muscle pain and chronic fatigue.

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, recently issued an update on adverse reaction reports relating to Gardasil.  The documents obtained from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) detail 26 new deaths reported following HPV vaccination between September 1, 2010 and September 15, 2011. That's 26 deaths of young, previously healthy, girls in just one year.

Other serious side effects reported during that time frame included:





Speech problems

Short term memory loss

Guillain-Barre syndrome

Ovarian cysts


Between May 2009 and September 2010, 16 deaths occurred after Gardasil vaccination.  For that timeframe there were also 789 reports of "serious" adverse reactions, of which 213 resulted in permanent disability and 25 resulting in a diagnosis of Guillain Barre Syndrome, Judicial Watch reported.

When Politics and Vaccine Safety Collide… You Usually Lose

According to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton:

"These reports raise additional concerns about Gardasil's questionable safety and provide ample reason to end the push to give it young girls and boys.  And the CDC's continued caginess on reported deaths is disturbing.  Federal, state, and local officials need to stop promoting this vaccine for children."

Unfortunately, many elected officials are doing just the opposite.  Texas Governor Rick Perry is a perfect example.  In 2007, he signed an Executive Order mandating all 11- and 12-year-old girls in Texas to get the HPV vaccine.  Fortunately, the law was overturned two months later, after a firestorm of opposition.  Many have now connected the dots and exposed his too-cozy ties to Merck, the maker of Gardasil.  More recently, Calfornia Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill allowing minors to be given Gardasil vaccine (and other vaccines for sexually transmitted diseases) without their parents' knowledge or informed consent..

Annual PAP Test Now Discouraged.  Why?

According to recently updated guidelines by the federal Preventive Services Task Force, women over 21 are now to be dissuaded from annual PAP smears.  Instead the panel recommends that women between 21 and 65 get a PAP smear test every three years, stating that "evidence is still insufficient to weigh harms and benefits of tests screening for human papillomavirus (HPV)."

Other cancer groups agree. As reported by Reuters:

"Everybody agrees on almost everything: Let's get rid of regular annual Pap testing, let's get rid of teenage screenings, let's screen women who aren't getting screened," said Debbie Saslow, the American Cancer Society's director of breast and gynecologic cancer.

The problem with this stance is that PAP smears prevent cervical cancer deaths far more effectively than the HPV vaccine ever will.  And it's hard to compare the potential side effects of the HPV vaccine with the potential side effects of PAP tests.  I've never heard of anyone dying or becoming paralyzed from a PAP smear…

Now, I don't necessarily disagree with their recommendation to reduce the frequency of PAP testing, but I question the double standard that is so readily visible here.  Why are cancer groups recommending getting rid of a safe and effective screening method, which we know saves lives, while vigorously advocating the clearly risky HPV vaccine?  For example, the National Cervical Cancer Coalition offers the following response to the question about Gardasil's safety:

"The FDA has licensed the vaccine as safe and effective.  This vaccine has been tested in thousands of females (9 to 26 years of age) around the world.  These studies have shown no serious side effects.  The most common side effect is brief soreness at the injection site." 
(Added Comment:  apparently these dead bodies don’t exist – and the permanently maimed lives are fictional.  Parents are delusional, and the girls are faking illness.  Reality isn’t real.  Welcome to vaccine’s Alice In Wonderland.!!!!!!)

It does not even hint at the many thousands of serious adverse events reported after Gardasil vaccinations to the government's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) since its approval, including 26 deaths in the past 12 months alone!

Furthermore, the death rate from cervical cancer in the United States is a mere 3 per 100,000.  Your daughter has a much higher risk of dying in a car accident than she does dying from cervical cancer. Cervical cancer rates are even lower in some European countries.  The reason why the mortality rate is so low is because the immune system's of the vast majority of women is usually strong enough to clear up this kind of infection on its own, and does so in more than 90 percent of all cases.  The CDC even admits to this fact on their website.

For the "Greater Good"—At What Price?

Rigidly maintaining the assumption that one-size-fits-all mass-vaccinations are necessary and "for the greater good" fails to take into account the possibility that there is harm being done to an increasing number of people, who are not being counted when vaccine benefit and risk calculations are done by health officials.

Keep in mind that to this day, we have NO reliable data indicating just how many children are truly being harmed by any particular vaccine, as adverse event reporting is completely voluntary.  Many people are still unaware that the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) even exists, or that you can file a report yourself if your doctor fails to make a report..

The CDC itself admits that only a small fraction of hospitalization, injuries and deaths after vaccination are ever reported. In one 1993 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, former FDA Commissioner David Kessler estimated that fewer than one percent of all doctors report injuries and deaths following the administration of prescription drugs.   This estimate may be even lower for vaccines.  According to Barbara Loe Fisher, one survey conducted by the NVIC in New York in 1994 revealed that only one doctor in 40 reported to VAERS.

In an ideal world scenario, any and all adverse events would be reported following vaccination, and health outcomes would be evaluated long-term.  Today, many doctors and health authorities simply

But on what do they base their conclusions? dismiss adverse events as "unrelated" to the vaccine.

I urge you to take the time to watch The Greater Good, and start to think about some of the profound questions raised in the film.  What we need is an open, intelligent, civil dialogue about how we can ensure the health and well-being of our children, and that doesn't mean it has to be all or nothing!  Everyone should be allowed to exercise voluntary, informed consent to vaccination and that means you should be able to use every recommended vaccine, some vaccines or no vaccines at all.  We should all have the legal right to make informed, voluntary decision about any drug or vaccine or medical procedure that carries risk to our health or the health of our children.

When our government recommends doctors give children 69 doses of vaccines and many of those vaccines are mandated, safety MUST become the FIRST priority for public health officials, and doctors giving vaccines.  It is essential that the appropriate studies be done to find out if the current vaccine schedule is doing far more harm than good.

What You Can Do to Make a Difference

While it seems "old-fashioned," the only truly effective actions you can take to protect the right to informed consent to vaccination and expand vaccine exemptions, is to get personally involved with your state legislators and the leaders in your community.


Mass vaccination policies are made at the federal level but vaccine laws are made at the state level, and it is at the state level where your action to protect your vaccine choice rights can have the greatest impact.

Signing up for NVIC's free Advocacy Portal at not only gives you access to practical, useful information to help you become an effective vaccine choice advocate in your own community, but when national vaccine issues come up, you will have the up-to-date information and call to action items you need at your fingertips to make sure your voice is heard.

So please, as your first step, sign up for the NVIC Advocacy Portal.

Contact Your Elected Officials

Write or email your elected state representatives and share your concerns.  Call them, or better yet, make an appointment to visit them in person in their office.  Don't let them forget you!

It is so important for you to reach out and make sure your concerns get on the radar screen of the leaders and opinion makers in your community, especially the politicians you elect and are directly involved in making vaccine laws in your state. These are your elected representatives, so you have a right and a responsibility to let them know what's really happening in your life and the lives of people you know when it comes to vaccine mandates.  Be sure to share the "real life" experiences that you or people you know have had with vaccination.

Share Your Story with the Media and People You Know

If you or a family member has suffered a serious vaccine reaction, injury or death, please talk about it. If we don't share information and experiences with each other, everybody feels alone and afraid to speak up.  Write a letter to the editor if you have a different perspective on a vaccine story that appears in your local newspaper.  Make a call in to a radio talk show that is only presenting one side of the vaccine story.

I must be frank with you; you have to be brave because you might be strongly criticized for daring to talk about the "other side" of the vaccine story. Be prepared for it and have the courage to not back down.  Only by sharing our perspective and what we know to be true about vaccination will the public conversation about vaccination open up so people are not afraid to talk about it.

We cannot allow the drug companies and medical trade associations funded by drug companies to dominate the conversation about vaccination. The vaccine injured cannot be swept under the carpet and treated like nothing more than "statistically acceptable collateral damage" of national one-size-fits-all mass vaccination policies that put way too many people at risk for injury and death. We shouldn't be treating people like guinea pigs instead of human beings.

Internet Resources Where You Can Learn More

I encourage you to visit the following web pages on the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) website at

  • NVIC Memorial for Vaccine Victims: View descriptions and photos of children and adults, who have suffered vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths. If you or your child experiences an adverse vaccine event, please consider posting and sharing your story here.
  • If You Vaccinate, Ask 8 Questions: Learn how to recognize vaccine reaction symptoms and prevent vaccine injuries.
  • Vaccine Freedom Wall: View or post descriptions of harassment by doctors or  government officials for making independent vaccine choices.

Connect with Your Doctor or Find a New One that Will Listen and Care

If your pediatrician or doctor refuses to provide medical care to you or your child unless you agree to get vaccines you don't want,  I strongly encourage you to have the courage to find another doctor. Harassment, intimidation, and refusal of medical care is becoming the modus operandi of the medical establishment in an effort to stop the change in attitude of many parents about vaccinations after they become truly educated about health and vaccination.

However, there is hope.

At least 15 percent of young doctors recently polled admit that they're starting to adopt a more individualized approach to vaccinations in direct response to the vaccine safety concerns of parents. It is good news that there is a growing number of smart young doctors, who prefer to work as partners with parents in making personalized vaccine decisions for children, including delaying vaccinations or giving children fewer vaccines on the same day or continuing to provide medical care for those families, who decline use of one or more vaccines.

So take the time to locate a doctor, who treats you with compassion and respect and is willing to work with you to do what is right for your child.


Source:  Judicial Watch October 2011

Source:  Reuters October 19, 2011

Related Links:

Latest Vaccine News

Don't Give This to Your Daughter - Despite What Your Doctor Says

New Warning About Everyday Poison Linked to Alzheimer's, ADHD, and Autism

Gardisal Threat to Boys Nov 2/11

Comment by Ed Griffin - US: Advisory panel for Center for Disease Control recommends that the Gardasil vaccine be given to boys supposedly to prevent genital warts.  Until now it has been touted to prevent cervical cancer in young girls.  This comes just days after Judicial Watch uncovered FDA documents revealing an additional 26 deaths from Gardasil. [It's all about money, and has nothing to do with cancer or warts.]Cdsapi’s Comment on the Article below:

Cdsapi’s Added Comment: Why this diabolical push to expand a “killer” vaccine.  (Note that only a small fraction of adverse reactions and deaths actually get reported to the CDC)  With yet another 26 deaths – added to the almost 100 previously recorded - from the vaccine Gardasil, it is blatantly obvious that “preventing deaths” is certainly not the reason for the incessant, unrelenting push to give EVERYONE – girls and boysthis extremely controversial and dangerous vaccine.
My speculation is that it is also more than just “all about more money for Big Pharma”.   
Since this vaccine has been shown to have very deleterious effects on the reproductive system, is it possible that this is one of the instruments of the Elite’s Agenda for “population reduction” - by destroying the reproductive capacity of a whole generation of young people? Why else “by government mandate”   as in Texas – and to be given “without parental consent”? 
Something reeks with a terrible stench
How many more deaths before there is massive refusal to be conned by these ‘government public health’ Pied Pipers into destroying our youth? /

Advisory Panel Urges CDC to Push Gardasil on Young Boys

Anthony Gucciardi
October 26, 2011

A government advisory committee that advises the Centers for Disease Control on vaccine recommendations has urged the CDC to recommend the HPV shot Gardasil to be given to boys between the ages of 11 and 12. Gardasil is already recommended to young girls, and in California girls as young as 12 are able to receive the shot without parental consent. The recommendation falls  perfectly in line with Merck’s latest campaign to expand the Gardasil demographic to young boys, with their deceptive ad campaign marketed specifically towards boys. What the government advisory committee is not discussing is the fact that Gardasil was linked to 3,589 harmful reactions between May 2009 and September 2010 alone.

They also fail to mention that previous legislative decisions regarding Gardasil were found to be corrupt and riddled with monetary incentives on behalf of Merck, the maker of Gardasil. Perhaps Merck has the almighty dollar included in this decision as well. The few thousand dollars given to each key legislator in the California decision is nothing compared to what Merck stands to gain from the legislation. The same is very true with the advisory committee. A CDC recommendation will vastly increase profits, way beyond the recent California legislation. In addition, health insurers typically cover vaccines that are recommended by the CDC.

In addition to routinely administering the HPV shot to boys between 11 and 12, the advisory panel is also calling for Gardasil to be given to boys as young as age 9 and for males ages 13 to 21 who have missed the “ideal vaccination age window” of 11-12.

The Gardasil scam is unraveling

The news comes just days after FDA documents were uncovered by Judicial Watch revealing an additional 26 deaths as a result of Gardasil use through adverse-reaction reports. In addition to the 26 deaths, the documents also detailed a number of severe side effects including seizures, paralysis, blindness, pancreatitis, speech problems, short-term memory loss and Guillain-Barré Syndrome.

Of course the average consumer would not know about this information, as Merck fails to mention any tidbit of truth on their website or in their popular ads.

In fact, on the official Gardasil website death is not listed as a side effect of Gardasil. Instead, Merck lists only minor side effects that conflict with mainstream reports of the extreme side effects associated with Gardasil. In Merck’s ad, they market Gardasil to young boys, showcasing their desire to expand the market to the male gender. Here is the list of side effects Merck provides consumers:

Pain, swelling, itching, bruising, and redness at the injection site







These phony symptoms are purely deceptive.  As previously mentioned, Gardasil was linked to 3,589 harmful reactions and 16 deaths between May 2009 and September 2010 alone.  Of the 3,589 adverse reactions, many were debilitating.  Permanent disability was the result of 213 cases; 25 resulted in the diagnosis of Guillain-Barre Syndrome; and there were 789 other “serious” reports according to FDA documents.

Not only should the CDC ignore the suggestion to make Gardasil a recommended vaccine, but they should call for the immediate discontinuation of the shot due to the massive amount of evidence linking it to death and serious side effects.

Explore More:

Gardasil Exposed – Deadly Vaccine Pushed on Millions of Young Boys and Girls Worldwide

Deceptive Gardasil Ad Campaign Omits Death Link, Numeric Facts

California Gardasil Law Signed | Children to Receive Deadly Shot Without Parental Consent

49 Dead, Others Hospitalized After Gardasil HPV Vaccine

Uncovered FDA Documents Reveal 26 More Gardasil Deaths

GMO Corn Oct 24/11

To Everyone Concerned About What They Are Eating

Monsanto is at it again.  Despite commanding over 60% of the U.S. corn market, they want more—they want to be on your plate. For the first time, Monsanto is marketing a genetically-modified (GM) corn that will be sold directly to consumers. This is NOT commodity corn that will be processed into oil or fed to animals.  These ears of sweet corn will go directly to grocery aisles, possibly in cans or frozen packs, where it will be impossible to tell them apart from pure varieties.

We’ve got to speak up about this where it counts.  Tell our nation’s largest supermarkets that we will not buy any corn unless it is clearly labeled non-GMO.

The new GM sweet corn is engineered to kill insects with Bt toxins and to resist heavy spraying with Roundup herbicide.  Already, Roundup resistant crops have resulted in an epidemic of over 21 types of resistant superweeds.  Even more alarming, recent studies have linked Roundup with birth defects in animals, and Bt toxins from GM foods have been found in the bloodstreams of pregnant mothers and their unborn babies. The results are clear: producing GM sweet-corn for direct human consumption will have untold environmental and health tolls.

And it doesn’t end here.  If successful, Monsanto is sure to introduce more GM produce targeted for supermarket shelves.

Let’s nip this in the bud now.  Trader Joe’s has already indicated they will not carry GM sweet corn. Sign to tell the rest of the top grocery chains to follow suit.

Fundamentally, this is about the freedom of choice.  If we aren’t even aware when a food has been genetically-modified, we can’t make an informed decision on whether to accept or reject the technology.  Monsanto is counting on our ignorance to push GM sweet corn on us.  We can show them we’re watching.

Working for safer food,

Ana and Crystal
The FRESH Team

© 2008 FRESH the movie - New thinking on what we’re eating.