Donate

Free newsletter



Site Manager

Tami Dickson

Follow Us





Follow Unittus
Search

Custom Search
Healing Body
Flu Shot are Medical Fraud?! Dec 12/14 Print E-mail
Friday, 12 December 2014 15:05

Why Flu Shots are the Greatest Medical Fraud in History
See article below.

Cdsapi’s Added Comment: There are many “government policies” that are major causative contributors to the exponential deterioration in the public’s health status in North America, especially in the children.

In the past decade we have been witnessing the literal health-destruction of an entire generation of children, (even prenatally), whose lives are being demolished by neurological, immunological and metabolic damage, precipitated not only by government regulatory neglect, but by “government supported, protected and even mandated polices”.

The medical budget is collapsing under the avalanche of illness of this unprecedented, exponential explosion in illness and disease, as increasing numbers of people suffer from INDUCED health disabilities.

The government mandated VACCINES – especially the Infant/Children Vaccine Schedule - stand at the top of the list.
However at the top the
vaccine misinformation fraud list, the most outrageous, present-day medical fraud being foisted on the entire population is the annual FLU SHOT program.

And remember that the initial cost, as well as consequences, of these Flu Vaccine Campaigns are paid for by the taxpayer – all of it going into the coffers of the lucrative “Vaccine Industry” of Big Pharma and the Medical Establishment.

Please READ the exposé of FRAUD in the following article. 
And then
pass it on to others who need to know the truth before they take yet another mercury-loaded flu shot.

I urge you to join the “Flu-Vaccine Refusers” once you understand the TRUTH of this monumental medical fraud – that has absolutely no scientific validation --  only a “proliferation-agenda”, fabricated hype and harassment pressure tactics.

The Big Pharma/Government “Agenda” and LIES are intentional, covert and monumental. 
The level of ad-induced
ignorance in a misinformed population is frightening. 
The
gullibility in a media-brainwashed public is a major obstacle to accepting the truth.
And the political and lobby pressure tactics, harassment and media distortion
are criminal.

The inevitable consequences of this “medical fraud” are so horrendous that courageous whistleblowers are emerging from within the system to alert the public, and to clear their own consciences, despite the probability of huge personal and professional sacrifices and penalties.

It is extremely important that we listen to them and learn from them - to protect them,  and to resolve to fight for our “medical freedom”. 
When we lose jurisdiction over our own body to bureaucratic mandates, there is no limit to what can be done to it or injected into it. 
We are then “AT THEIR MERCY”  which is the status at which we now find ourselves collectively.
Medical Freedom is the most fundamental HUMAN RIGHT that no one can afford to relinquish.

Medical Fraud of this magnitude, legalistically and bureaucratically protected and mandated, must be exposed, eradicated and punished.

Please take action to protect yourselves, your children, your family and everyone else that you care about. Refuse to take the Flu Shot!
If EVERYONE were to do that,
the SCAM would come to a very rapid end.

**Comment by cdsapi - Citizens Demand Scientific, Academic, Political and Media INTEGRITY

“Come into my parlor”, said the spider to the fly.  “And join me ‘for’ dinner”.
Do not follow the lure of the Pied Pipers that leads into a dungeon of misery.”

 

Why Flu Shots are the Greatest Medical Fraud in History

Wednesday, December 10, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

http://www.naturalnews.com/047942_flu_shots_medical_fraud_vaccine_quackery.html

(NaturalNews)  As one of the very few independent voices willing to stand up against the scientific dogma of our modern medical regime, I've long felt a need to communicate the dangers of flu shots to the public so that people can have better information to prevent vaccine injuries and save lives.

This doesn't mean I'm opposed to the theory of vaccination, by the way.  In fact, I'm the author of A Blueprint for Safer Vaccines,  an audio guide to saving lives and preventing vaccine injuries and deaths.

To my knowledge, I'm the only independent journalist in the world who is scientifically trained to run an atomic mass spectrometry laboratory, which I've been running for nearly a year now and testing the heavy metals content of organic superfoods like cacao, common vaccines as well as the ability of water filers to remove toxic heavy metals.  I'm the creator of the Low Heavy Metals Verified standard and I'm the inventor of patent-pending nutritional formulas for capturing heavy metals during digestion and binding with the radioactive isotopes of cesium (such as Cesium-137) to eliminate them from the digestive tract.  Both of these patents are on file with the U.S. patent office awaiting a decision.

My independent atomic elemental analysis of flu vaccines, published in the summer of 2014, proved that flu vaccines contain over 50 ppm mercury, an extremely toxic heavy metal   linked to kidney failure,   birth defects,   spontaneous abortions and   neurological damage. This finding has never been refuted by anyone. 
In fact, it was affirmed by
vaccine proponents who insisted that it is perfectly safe to inject pregnant women, young children and senior citizens with mercury, even though the flu vaccine insert itself readily admits there is no scientific evidence whatsoever to support the safety and efficacy of the vaccine in such groups.

Believe it or not, there are still millions of people, doctors, pharmacists and even journalists who do not yet realize there is a very high concentration of mercury in influenza vaccines given to pregnant women, children and senior citizens. Most people, you see, have been lied to by the media which has stated over and over again that mercury was removed from all vaccines.

That's simply not true.

It's still there.  And toxic mercury is present in influenza vaccines at a level that's literally 25,000 times higher than the EPA limit of mercury in drinking water. [7] 
It's 100 times higher than the highest level of mercury contamination I've ever tested in ocean fish.

See the evidence for yourself

To prove the presence of mercury in influenza vaccines, I'm going to show you four irrefutable pieces of evidence:

1) Photographs of a 2013 / 2014 influenza vaccine box admitting, in very small print, to the addition of mercury to the vaccine as a preservative.

2) Photographs of the influenza vaccine insert once again repeating the admission that the vaccine contains mercury.

3) A screen shot from the Centers for Disease Control website which admits that vaccines still contain the following ingredients:  Aluminum,  Antibiotics,  Egg Protein,  Formaldehyde,  Monosodium Glutamate (MSG)  and Thimerosal, a mercury-containing chemical compound.

4) Lab results from the Natural News Forensic Food Lab which confirmed almost precisely the same level of mercury claimed by the manufacturer (GlaxoSmithKline).

Before I show you the irrefutable evidence, there is some good news in all this testing.  As part of this Natural News investigation, I tested several different vaccines, including an HPV vaccine.  Mercury levels were extremely low in these other vaccines. Only the flu shot contained extremely high mercury levels.

Influenza vaccine box admits safety never established for pregnant women

As you can see below, the box for this Flulaval Influenza Virus Vaccine readily admits the use of thimerosal which contains mercury.  (Of course, you have to use a magnifying glass to see this.) In microscopic text on the package insert, it says straight out, "Register women who receive Flulaval while pregnant in the pregnancy registry by calling 1-888-452-9622."

Yet, at the same time, the insert also admits that "safety and efficacy have not been established in pregnant women."

In other words, this vaccine containing mercury is being promoted for use in pregnant women even when no safety in pregnant women has ever been established.

It's also important to note that when people are being given flu shots, they are never handed the package or the insert, so they have no opportunity to read any of this information unless they specifically ask for it.

It's not like a food item with a "Nutrition Facts" label.  Vaccines are sold in "stealth" mode where patients have no idea what's in them and no opportunity to read possible warnings.

http://www.naturalnews.com/images/Influenza-Virus-Vaccine-Flulaval-Box-Mercury-Preservative-600.jpg

As further proof of this point, consider the fact that this flu vaccine comes with only one insert, yet it's a 10-dose vial intended to be injected into 10 different people.  Clearly, if there's only one insert but 10 people, then 9 out of 10 people can't possibly be handed the insert.

Unethical medicine administered without informed consent (a violation of medical ethics)

In fact, from a legal perspective, vaccines are routinely injected into people without informed consent.  Virtually no one administering vaccines ever explains the risks vs. benefits of vaccines as is required under medical ethics and state medical law.  In nearly all cases, patients are simply hoodwinked and told there are no risks at all.

The second piece of evidence to reveal here is the package insert for the influenza vaccine, a document printed in microscopic text that's almost impossible to read without a magnifying glass.

Of course, the intention is that no one ever read this document, because it contains shocking admissions of the total quackery and marketing deception behind flu shots.

http://www.naturalnews.com/images/Flulaval-Influenza-Vaccine-Insert-600.jpg

As you can see from this snapshot, the package insert readily admits that each vaccine dose "contains 50 mcg thimerosal (<25 mcg mercury)."

In case you're wondering, "mcg" means micrograms.  A microgram is 1/1000th of a milligram.  Mercury is toxic at any dose when injected into the body, even in micrograms. There is no such thing as a "safe" form of mercury when injected. 
In fact, the ethyl form of mercury used in vaccines is many times more toxic than methyl form once it enters human cells.
Click here for a fascinating interview with mercury toxicity expert Dr. Chris Shade who explains this extremely important concept.

The same paragraph shown above also admits the vaccine contains formaldehyde, a potent neurotoxic chemical.

Vaccine insert admits safety and effectiveness have never been established

What's even more astonishing about this insert is that it openly admits the flu shot is a complete medical hoax, backed by nothing but voodoo woo woo faith-based dogma (and clever marketing).

Here are actual words from the insert (which is much more lengthy than the snapshot shown above):

"There have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with Flulaval."

"Safety and effectiveness of Flulaval have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers or children."

"Safety and effectiveness of Flulaval in pediatric patients have not been established."

"Flulaval has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility."

"Do not administer Flulaval to anyone... following previous administration of any influenza vaccine."

CDC admits use of mercury, MSG, formaldehyde

For those "mercury denialists" who still can't believe flu shots given to pregnant women contain high concentrations of toxic mercury, even the CDC reluctantly admits this fact on its own website.

Here's a screen shot from the CDC's vaccine additives page, which miraculously hasn't yet been removed from their site:

http://www.naturalnews.com/images/CDC-Additives-Listing-Vaccines-Source-600.jpg

Laboratory results from the Natural News Forensic Food Lab

The final piece of irrefutable evidence on all this comes from my own scientific laboratory, where I run ICP-MS instrumentation to test foods, beverages, dietary supplements and other items for heavy metals contamination.

I was the first food researcher to document high levels of tungsten in brown rice protein,  and I've exposed alarming levels of lead in pet treats.  I've also exposed high lead in ginkgo biloba herbal supplements imported from China.

When I finally got around to testing vaccines, I was shocked to find over 51,000 ppb mercury in the Influenza Virus Vaccine.

Why was I shocked?  Because I don't recall ever seeing anything run through my ICP-MS instrument with that high a concentration of mercury. The mercury in this flu vaccine was the HIGHEST concentration of mercury I've ever seen in anything, period!

And this is a product that's injected directly into the bodies of pregnant women, where mercury goes right into the developing fetus.

What's even more interesting is that this finding once again confirms the accuracy of my lab instrumentation because it's almost in perfect agreement with the level of mercury detailed on the vaccine package insert.

Let's do the math:

* Each dose of an influenza vaccine is 0.5 mL in volume
* My lab found just over 50 ppm of mercury in the vaccine liquid.
* 50 ppm (concentration) x 0.5 mL (volume) equals 25 mcg of mercury.

Guess what the package insert says?  (Up to) 25 mcg of mercury per dose.  Near-perfect agreement, in other words.  My finding of 51 ppm rather than 50 ppm either means my own tests were off by about 2% (which is still considered very accurate for ICP-MS testing) or that GSK put 2% extra mercury into the vaccine.

And just so you know I actually did the tests, here's what else we found with other analytes:

Aluminum: 0.4 ppm
Arsenic: zero
Cadmium: zero
Lead: zero

So, I can confidently say that the flu vaccine won't poison you with lead, cadmium or arsenic because it contains none of those things.  Even the aluminum level is quite low and not a concern at this very low level.  The real problem is just the mercury, at least as far as elements go.

Why won't vaccine makers remove the mercury?

Good question.  Everybody knows mercury is toxic to inject into the human body.  That's not debated except by irrational anti-science denialists who refuse to acknowledge the Table of Elements.

You have to wonder: why choose mercury as a preservative?  And why do both the CDC and FDA continue to look the other way as an entire branch of modern medicine poisons our women and children with a neurotoxic heavy metal?

And if vaccine promoters, propagandists and patent holders want the world to accept all their vaccines, why don't they just remove the mercury and be done with it?  If they take out all the toxic elements, resistance to vaccines would all but evaporate.

Why vaccines are the "anti-science" medical voodoo of the modern world

Ever wonder why they don't conduct legitimate clinical trials on flu vaccine efficacy?
Probably because they know the results would have to be faked to show any efficacy at all.
That's what
Merck did with its mumps vaccines, according to two former virologists who worked there
They spiked human blood samples with animal antibodies to fabricate positive results.
Yep, vaccines work so poorly that even the manufacturers have to fake their own results to show any efficacy.

Vaccines are the one medicine where no scientific evidence of safety or efficacy is required by anyone: not the FDA, not the CDC and not the media.
Congress even passed a law protecting the vaccine industry with absolute legal immunity, even when they manufacture and sell defective products that injure and kill people.

How's that for medicine we can all trust?  Think about it: this is
a product that - contains multiple neurotoxins in very high concentrations;
- a product backed by no safety trials or efficacy data;
- a product linked to numerous serious adverse reactions;
-and yet a product that enjoys absolute legal immunity thanks to the U.S. government.

If that's not outright medical quackery, I don't know what is.

For the record, I'm not an opponent of all vaccines.  But I do believe -- as do a rapidly increasing number of other clear-thinking people – that medicine should not poison our women and children.  It's time for mercury to be removed from all vaccines, once and for all.  Anything less is medical negligence.

http://www.naturalnews.com/images/Infographic-How-Much-Mercury-is-Really-in-a-Flu-Shot-600.jpg

New video interview about flu shot failures

Ultimately, We the People will be victorious in the removal of mercury from all vaccines -- an idea that's already well accepted across much of Europe.  And when that day comes, it will be yet another victory for the Natural News fan base, an amazing community of millions of remarkable people working together for the protection of our children, our health and our world.

See my recent video interview with Next News Network's Gary Franchi on why flu shots are failures:

Sources for this article include:
[1]
http://www.naturalnews.com/046679_safer_vacc...
[2]
http://www.waterfilterlabs.com
[3]
http://www.heavymetalsdefense.com
[4]
http://www.cesiumeliminator.com
[5]
http://www.lowheavymetalsverified.org
[6]
http://www.naturalnews.com/045418_flu_shots_...
[7]
http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basi...

http://www.naturalnews.com/047942_flu_shots_medical_fraud_vaccine_quackery.html

More news on flu shots

Stop the Walgreens flu shot harassment! Employees rewarded with iPads for meeting vaccination recruitment goals?

Lysol bribes customers with cash prizes to get their flu shots, recruit others

CDC issues flu vaccine apology: this year's vaccine doesn't work!

Shock vaccine study reveals influenza vaccines only prevent the flu in 1.5 out of 100 adults (not 60% as you've been told)

Elderberries make flu shots look like ridiculous poison cocktails

Healthcare workers to be fired if they refuse flu shots, medical group demands (opinion)

In 'universal' flu shot push, medical industry admits current flu shots are useless

http://www.naturalnews.com/047942_flu_shots_medical_fraud_vaccine_quackery.html

 

 
Macadamia Nut Oil Better then Olive Oil! Dec 9/14 Print E-mail
Tuesday, 09 December 2014 15:41

The Nutrition Investigator, Mike Geary, discusses REAL nutrition for a healthy lean body

Innovative tips and tricks to help you get flat abs, lose body fat, fight aging & live a healthier life. I'll even cover controversial topics that mainstream health "experts" don't understand about nutrition...the TRUTH about cholesterol & saturated fat, carbs, protein, and even superfoods you may have never heard of!
Monday
A "super-oil" that's possibly healthier than olive oil?
Pretty much everybody these days has heard the news about how healthy olive oil is for you... It's good for your heart, lowers blood pressure, cools inflammation and extends life span -- it's one of the reasons why the Mediterranean lifestyle is so good for you.

But there's ANOTHER oil that runs circles around olive oil in terms of health benefits, but almost nobody knows about it for some odd reason.  It's native to the rainforests of Australia and was used by the Aborigines for thousands of years before being "discovered" by European settlers.

It's got a smooth, buttery, almost sweet taste with a beautiful, golden appearance -- you can even drink it straight. Let's see you try THAT with olive oil!  In fact, it's SO delicious and versatile that famous chefs from all around the world are using it as their secret weapon.

Use this oil and you'll get a HUGE metabolic advantage when it comes to boosting energy, thinking faster and getting rid of those extra inches that seem to keep piling on as you age.  This "super oil" has 3 MAJOR metabolic advantages that are just as good, and possibly even better than olive oil:

Metabolic Advantage #1

It's is loaded with a fat that's SO healthy that even the low-carb AND low-fat authors agree you should get more of it.  I am talking about monounsaturated fat or MUFA... the SAME beneficial fat found in olive oil. However, this "super oil" comes out on top containing about 10% MORE monounsaturated fat.

While the monounsaturated fat is where much of the blood-pressure-, cholesterol-lowering and life-extending benefits come from, this special fat is also a metabolic SUPER-fuel.  That's because of its relatively simple chemical structure, allowing it to be burned in your mitochondria (your cellular energy-producing factories) MUCH more easily.

That means MORE energy, better mental performance, a more stable mood, less hunger and less unwanted fat in those trouble spots.

Metabolic Advantage #2

Most people now know that having a proper balance of omega-3 to omega-6 fats is CRITICAL to staying healthy, young, full of energy and keeping those aches and pains at bay.  Too many omega-6s sets off a rampaging wild fire of inflammation that wreaks havoc on virtual every organ, tissue and cell in your body, totally destroying your metabolism and forcing you to get fat.

And while olive oil is decent in this department with only 9.8% of its content being omega-6s, this "super oil" comes in at a puny 1.7%!  That's important because the average person gets TWENTY TIMES more omega-6s than they should, so the LAST thing you need is more.

Metabolic Advantage #3

Olive oil's Achilles' heel is that it can be very vulnerable to oxidation and rancidity under the wrong conditions -- everything from heat to light to oxygen can damage the precious fats that it contains, killing some of the nutritional value and ruining its taste a bit too.

If this occurs in any oils, these rancid, oxidized fats also create free radicals that damage your cellular membranes, blood vessels and even your DNA -- none of which do ANY favors for your metabolism.  Those pesky free radicals literally "rust" you from the inside out, much in the same way an apple or guacamole turns brown when exposed to the air.

This "super oil", however, is light resistant and doesn't turn rancid over time and is very shelf stable due to the tremendous amounts of antioxidants it has.  For example, this "super oil" has nearly 5x the amount of tocopherol, a powerful antioxidant, when compared to olive oil.

So what IS this mysterious "super oil"?

Almost nobody talks about this hidden gem and it's a shame, because the list of metabolic benefits is endless...

I am talking about macadamia nut oil.

To be clear, olive oil isn't bad for you at all -- it's actually fantastic -- but pound for pound, macadamia nut oil is possibly even better for you -- it tastes great, it's more versatile for cooking and is much healthier and tastier for baking uses.  I absolutely LOVE a fresh extra virgin olive oil, and it will ALWAYS have a place in my kitchen almost daily... but macadamia nut oil is the new "secret agent" healthy oil that most people don't know about.

Plus, it also gives you an enormous metabolic advantage -- very important if you've had trouble getting rid of stubborn fat, particularly around your belly, hips, thighs and butt.

This next page here will show you 3 other foods that can also give you a metabolic advantage, fight aging, burn off stubborn fat, and give you a nice jolt of sustained energy to power your day.

Oh, one more tip -- try to buy only organic macadamia nut oil that's been cold-pressed mechanically -- this preserves as much of the nutritional value as possible without damaging those healthy fats.

So give it a try... you're gonna love it!

P.S. Food #2 that you'll find on this next page is also absolutely loaded with the SAME type of super-fuel as macadamia nut oil. You can put it in smoothies, it's absolutely delicious and is loaded with metabolism-boosting and anti-aging antioxidants as well.

Mike Geary
Certified Nutrition Specialist
Certified Personal Trainer

 
GMO Boycott Join in protect your families! Nov 22/14 Print E-mail
Saturday, 22 November 2014 16:34

GMO Dangers to know about please share with everyone you know!

see 6 huge players in the food industry to avoid and boycott. You can boycott their products for the best effect or you can petition them and ask them to stop throwing money at the anti-labeling campaigns.

Here are 6 huge conglomerates aiming to ruin your right to know what is in your food.

- See more at: http://naturalsociety.com/take-foods-shopping-list-6-multinational-companies-fighting-keep-eating-gmos/#sthash.Faoiaxo2.dpuf

See 6 huge players in the food industry to avoid and boycott. You can boycott their products for the best effect or you can petition them and ask them to stop throwing money at the anti-labeling campaigns.

Here are 6 huge conglomerates aiming to ruin your right to know what is in your food.

Click here: 6 GMO Loaded Brands You Should Avoid Buying | Natural Society

see 6 huge players in the food industry to avoid and boycott. You can boycott their products for the best effect or you can petition them and ask them to stop throwing money at the anti-labeling campaigns.

Here are 6 huge conglomerates aiming to ruin your right to know what is in your food.

- See more at: http://naturalsociety.com/take-foods-shopping-list-6-multinational-companies-fighting-keep-eating-gmos/#sthash.Faoiaxo2.dpuf

see 6 huge players in the food industry to avoid and boycott. You can boycott their products for the best effect or you can petition them and ask them to stop throwing money at the anti-labeling campaigns.

Here are 6 huge conglomerates aiming to ruin your right to know what is in your food.

- See more at: http://naturalsociety.com/take-foods-shopping-list-6-multinational-companies-fighting-keep-eating-gmos/#sthash.Faoiaxo2.dpuf

GMO Sodas

Every one of these soft drinks includes high fructose corn syrup (one of the most common GMO ingredients) or just plain “sugar,” which is sourced from genetically modified sugar beets.

Coca Cola Company

Coca Cola
Sprite
Cherry Coke
Fanta Exotic
Barq’s Root Beer
Minute Maid Orange
Minute Maid Grape
Surge
Ultra

PepsiCo

Pepsi
Slice
Wild Cherry Pepsi
Mug Root Beer
Mountain Dew

Cadbury/Schweppes

7-Up
Dr. Pepper
A & W Root Beer
Sunkist Orange
Schweppes Ginger Ale


Click here: 6 GMO Loaded Brands You Should Avoid Buying | Natural Society

see 6 huge players in the food industry to avoid and boycott. You can boycott their products for the best effect or you can petition them and ask them to stop throwing money at the anti-labeling campaigns.

Here are 6 huge conglomerates aiming to ruin your right to know what is in your food.

 
Root Canals & Wheat Negative Effects on Body! Nov 19/14 Print E-mail
Wednesday, 19 November 2014 15:59
How root canals lead to a diseased body and what you can do to about it
Sunday, November 09, 2014 by: Kali Sinclair



(NaturalNews) Melanie was a young mother of two children and a housewife when she became ill. First her ear began popping every time she

swallowed and she could feel the pressure of fluid in her ear. Soon it was hard to swallow. Gynecological problems were followed by systemic

symptoms of overwhelming pain and fatigue. Eventually, Melanie, sick as she was, was forced to go get a job in order to pay her medical bills. She was miserable and in constant pain until the day she had her dead tooth pulled.

Before any of her symptoms began, Melanie had an infected tooth and a subsequent root canal. Later, although she experienced no pain at the site, the tooth was the root of her health problems. She
felt better the first day that tooth was pulled, and all of her symptoms disappeared with a few months.

Melanie's story is not uncommon, though the realization that the root canal is the source of disease is uncommon. Many people who have had a root canal suffer from a sudden onset of chronic disease
and never realize the connection.

Why root canals are dangerous

After a root canal is performed, the tooth is dead. The remaining tissue and structure now provides a ripe

environment for remaining bacteria. Tooth

material (dentine) is not solid. It is rife with tubules - incredibly small canals or tunnels. If you were to stretch out the tubules in each tooth, tubules

from incisors would reach 3 miles, while tubules from molars would reach 9 miles.

Once the pulp is removed from the tooth, there is no longer a blood or oxygen supply. The bacteria that remain can mutate to an anaerobic form and multiply until there are millions living within the tubules of the dead tooth. From there, they secrete potent toxins.

Holistic practitioners are finding these dead teeth are often a source of disease for the body - everything from unexplained symptoms to cancer. For example, Dr. Garcia tells of a woman who consulted several doctors for a mysterious swelling in one leg. Within one day after Dr. Garcia removed the woman's tooth (an old root canal), the swelling was gone. When Dr. Thomas Rau, a Swiss physician who specializes in breast cancer, learned of the possible link between root canals and cancer, he investigated his last 150 patients and found that 97% of them did have one or more root canals - and they were on the same meridian side of the body as the cancer!

A dead tooth may spew toxins into the body with no detectible symptoms - no pain, no swelling of the gums - nothing to alert you that it is wrecking havoc upon your immune system and causing chronic and acute medical conditions that you are attempting to cure.

Speak with your holistic dentist about extracting and replacing cadaverous teeth and how to proceed with ongoing dental care. In the meantime, you must eat a diet that aids you in releasing those toxins, while building and supporting the immune system.

How to support your immune system
A truly healthy diet is the foundation of health and a healthy immune system. If your body is dealing with toxins from cavitations or if you are dealing with the aftereffects, give your body the nutrient dense foods it needs.Whether vegetarian, vegan, or carnivorous, your diet should consist of80% raw produce--more vegetables than fruits. This is not the time to challenge your already overburdened immune system, and it's imperative to avoid foods that feed harmful pathogens. Buy organic--no herbicides,no pesticides, no GMOs. No artificial flavors, colors, preservatives, MSG, GMOs, or trans fats. No sugar. In other words, eat real food, not processed food.

Check out Bullet Proof Your Immune System and Heal Gum Disease Naturally. If you're dealing with a combination of cavitations, mercury fillings, and/or root canals, be sure to check out the first source below.

Sources:
http://www.organiclifestylemagazine.com
http://www.organiclifestylemagazine.com
http://webpages.charter.net
https://www.youtube.com
https://www.youtube.com
http://bigdiastema.com
http://truthwiki.org/Garlic

About the author:
Kali Sinclair is a copywriter for Green Lifestyle Market, and a lead editor for Organic Lifestyle Magazine. Kali was very sick with autoimmune disease and realized that conventional medicine was not working for her. She has been restoring her health by natural means and is interested in topics including natural health, environmental issues, and human rights. 


The Real Reason Wheat is Toxic (it’s not the gluten)

toxic                                                            wheat

GREEN LIVING

by Sarah TheHealthyHomeEconomist November 13, 2014

13.1K
toxic wheat

The stories became far too frequent to ignore.

Emails from folks with allergic or digestive issues to wheat in the United States experienced no symptoms whatsoever when they tried eating pasta on vacation in Italy.
Confused parents wondering why wheat consumption sometimes triggered autoimmune reactions in their children but not at other times.

In my own home, I’ve long pondered why my husband can eat the wheat I prepare at home, but he experiences negative digestive effects eating even a single roll in a restaurant.
There is clearly something going on with wheat that is not well known by the general public. It goes far and beyond organic versus nonorganic, gluten or hybridization because even conventional wheat triggers no symptoms for some who eat wheat in other parts of the world.

What indeed is going on with wheat?

For quite some time, I secretly harbored the notion that wheat in the United States must, in fact, be genetically modified.  GMO wheat secretly invading the North American food supply seemed the only thing that made sense and could account for the varied experiences I was hearing about.

I reasoned that it couldn’t be the gluten or wheat hybridization. Gluten and wheat hybrids have been consumed for thousands of years. It just didn’t make sense that this could be the reason for so many people suddenly having problems with wheat and gluten in general in the past 5-10 years.

Finally, the answer came over dinner a couple of months ago with a friend who was well versed in the wheat production process. I started researching the issue for myself, and was, quite frankly, horrified at what I discovered.

The good news is that the reason wheat has become so toxic in the United States is not because it is secretly GMO as I had feared (thank goodness!).

The bad news is that the problem lies with the manner in which wheat is grown and harvested by conventional wheat farmers.

You’re going to want to sit down for this one.  I’ve had some folks burst into tears in horror when I passed along this information before.

Common wheat harvest protocol in the United States is to drench the wheat fields with Roundup several days before the combine harvesters work through the fields as the practice allows for an earlier, easier and bigger harvest

Pre-harvest application of the herbicide Roundup or other herbicides containing the deadly active ingredient glyphosate to wheat and barley as a desiccant was suggested as early as 1980.  It has since become routine over the past 15 years and is used as a drying agent 7-10 days before harvest within the conventional farming community.USDA pesticides applied to wheat


USDA                                                            pesticides                                                            applied to                                                            wheat

According to Dr. Stephanie Seneff of MIT who has studied the issue in depth and who I recently saw present on the subject at a nutritional Conference in Indianapolis, desiccating non-organic wheat crops with glyphosate just before harvest came into vogue late in the 1990′s with the result that most of the non-organic wheat in the United States is now contaminated with it.  Seneff explains that when you expose wheat to a toxic chemical like glyphosate, it actually releases more seeds resulting in a slightly greater yield:   “It ‘goes to seed’ as it dies. At its last gasp, it releases the seed” says Dr. Seneff.

According to the US Department of Agriculture, as of 2012, 99% of durum wheat, 97% of spring wheat, and 61% of winter wheat has been treated with herbicides. This is an increase from 88% for durum wheat, 91% for spring wheat and 47% for winter wheat since 1998.

Here’s what wheat farmer Keith Lewis has to say about the practice:

I have been a wheat farmer for 50 yrs and one wheat production practice that is very common is applying the herbicide Roundup (glyposate) just prior to harvest. Roundup is licensed for preharvest weed control. Monsanto, the manufacturer of Roundup claims that application to plants at over 30% kernel moisture result in roundup uptake by the plant into the kernels. Farmers like this practice because Roundup kills the wheat plant allowing an earlier harvest.

A wheat field often ripens unevenly, thus applying Roundup preharvest evens up the greener parts of the field with the more mature. The result is on the less mature areas Roundup is translocated into the kernels and eventually harvested as such.

This practice is not licensed. Farmers mistakenly call it “dessication.” Consumers eating products made from wheat flour are undoubtedly consuming minute amounts of Roundup. An interesting aside, malt barley which is made into beer is not acceptable in the marketplace if it has been sprayed with preharvest Roundup. Lentils and peas are not accepted in the market place if it was sprayed with preharvest roundup….. but wheat is ok.. This farming practice greatly concerns me and it should further concern consumers of wheat products.

Here’s what wheat farmer Seth Woodland of Woodland and Wheat in Idaho had to say about the practice of using herbicides for wheat dry down:
Last Updated on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 16:38
Read more...
 
Aspartame Ban & Coca Cola Deceptions? Nov 18/14 Print E-mail
Tuesday, 18 November 2014 15:42

Subject: Coke Attempts to defend artificial Sweeteners

I'm always amused by Coke's PR Department.  Their advertising campaign didn't work this last time and now they are trying it again.  They just keep on adding insult to injury.  Don't they realize that the first thing a consumer will do is google aspartame dangers and the game is over.
For instance, here is the National Soft Drink Assn's protest and the email to Dick Adamson, of  American Beverage (formerly  NSDA) which he never answered/ Perhaps he is still taking the fifth!  http://www.mpwhi.com/open_letter_dick_adamson.htm How do you go against 30 years of independent research and the FDA's own records.  We have two congressional hearings on aspartame on www.mpwhi.com Giants can fall too, especially when the public realizes they have been lied to all these years.  Having a proxy to attend the stockholder's meeting I even held up the 1000 page medical text, "Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic" by the late H,. J. Roberts, MD.  It's on tape of their meeting. 

I also remember Lucky Vanous, called the Diet Coke hunk, when he came to Atlanta.  I threw him a decorated box with the records and this protest of the National Soft Drink Assn so he would realize that these kids trying to get his autograph would also be using the product.  On Hardcopy 58 days later, Lucky Vanous already had another job.   Betty  www.mpwhi.com


Coca-Cola Attempts to Defend its Artificial Sweeteners through a New Ad


Coca-Cola Attempts to Defend its Artificial Sweeteners through a New Ad

Kevin Winslow November 13, 2014 Report, World

Current trends show that along with soft drinks, there has also been a considerable decline in the sales of diet drinks and Coca-Cola is one such soft-drink manufacturer that has been dealing with the wrath of slowdown in soft drink and beverages industry. In order to protect its line of diet drinks, the leading soft drink maker has released an ad that attempts to defend its line of diet drinks. The print ad developed by the company will run on this Wednesday. The ad clearly signals that the company is not just having issues with its soft drinks, or the diet drinks that it sells.

Idea behind the Ad Campaign

The soft drink leader has been reportedly dealing with various challenges related to sales and growth across its line of both non-sugary and sugary colas. The company has now planned to roll out the newspaper ad for next several days. Through the ad, the company wants to convey the message that its diet drinks are made of aspartame, which are completely safe. The ad also claims that aspartame is considered safe based on over 200 studies conducted in last four decades. The print ad is expected to be featured on different issues of USA TODAY that are circulated in Atlanta region. After the ad releases this Wednesdays, it will appear on The Atlanta Journal Constitution on the next day and in the coming week the print ad by Coca-Cola will also appear in Chicago Tribune.

Prime Objective

It is being said that Coca-Cola is referring to this move as a calculated business strategy for battling the competitors and critics who are unnecessarily causing the consumers to move away from all kinds of soft drinks. The ad’s headline conveys the message that Coca-Cola offers high quality products that the consumers can feel good about.

The ad also offers to share the third party studies conducted on their colas in a bid to show that they market only those products that contain either low calorie or no calorie sweeteners. This ad is also said to be representing the company’s next phase of campaign that was started back in January to push back all the critics who claim that the soft drinks manufactured by Coca-Cola increase obesity rates.

Decline in Sales

Beverage Digest says that there has been a considerable decline in diet drinks and they have seen high loss in sales compared to regular soft drinks. Last years’ Coke’s sales volume plunged 1% and that of Diet Coke fell 3%. Pepsi saw a decline in 3.4% and Diet Pepsi plunged 6.2%.

FDA Answers Petition to Ban Aspartame After 14 Years

When I first saw their report on Google from Law360 there were only two paragraphs. Later the rest of the release was added  on google news and I realized FDA was actually responding to my 2002 petition for the toxic sweetener to be banned. FDA mentions also Dr. K. Stoller's petition but omitted the vital fact that Stoller is an M.D.

I appreciate Law360 for revealing FDA's long delayed answer to my petition. FDA apparently doesn't want to communicate directly to me because I have their records and can expose their coverup.  They won't even answer a FOIA request from 2010. By law a citizen's petition for ban must be answered in 180 days. FDA had told me they had more important things to do.  The imminent health hazard amendment in 2007 that is suppose to be answered in a week or ten days was ignored.

I just wrote a long and detailed report answering what I had read from Law360 showing FDA's many lies:  http://www.rense.com/general96/fda.html Now having read the rest mentioning my petition this is part two.  Some of their additional absurd remarks need to be explained. Basically they have denied the petition saying aspartame doesn't cause cancer because they know it's against the Delaney Amendment to approve something that does.  In the first part  I quoted Dr. Adrian Gross, FDA's lead scientist and toxicologist, who clearly stated aspartame causes cancer. FDA lies about this to protect the poison producers, letting the public sicken and die. In 2009 I received a call from FDA's Michael Delaney upset that I had added the imminent health hazard amendment.  He made everything clear when he said: "We have to depopulate!"  
On five acres in Elberton, Georgia stand the Georgia Guidestones which display Ten Guides to an "Age of Reason."  The first is: "Maintain Earth's population at 500 million" a call to kill 93% of the eight billion humans now on Earth. Apparently FDA is in agreement.
It is tragic aspartame is addictive.  The methyl-ester  immediately becomes free methyl alcohol when consumed and is classified as a narcotic causing methanol poisoning. This affects the dopamine system of the brain  creating  addiction.  A waitress told me: "if there are two groups, one drinking Coke and the other drinking Diet Coke, the Diet Coke group will drink three times as much." 

Aspartame is a neurotoxic drug that damages the mitochondria, powerhouse of the cell, and interacts with drugs and vaccines.  These  facts are laid out in the 1,000 page medical text Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic by the late illustrious H. J. Roberts, M.D., www.sunsentpress.com

Now read the whole short release, and below it, I will answer what I had not read.  


FDA Rejects Ban On Diet Soda Sweetener Aspartame

Share us on: By Jeff Overley
Law360, New York (October 27, 2014, 6:58 PM ET) -- The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has rejected calls to ban low-calorie sweetener aspartame, finding no evidence that the widely used diet soda additive causes cancer.
In responses released Friday, the FDA shot down two citizen petitions that urged regulators to recall the ingredient and to revoke a regulation that allows its use in food. Aspartame is sold under the brand name NutraSweet, is a component of coffee sweetener Equal and is commonly used in popular soft drinks, including Diet Coke.

One of the FDA's responses addressed a petition originally lodged in 2002 by Georgia-based Mission Possible World Health International, a group focused in large part on the purported dangers of aspartame consumption. That petition attracted more than 1,000 public comments, although most have not been published by the FDA.

According to the FDA, the petition blamed incidences of brain tumors and seizures on aspartame but failed to back up its allegations with concrete data.

The anecdotal accounts of adverse effects of aspartame cited in the citizen petition are not supported by scientific evidence, FDA officials said.

Regulators at times suggested that the concerns are nothing new, writing that some of the alleged health risks were raised roughly 30 years ago and addressed in detail at the time.

Over the past decade, almost 200 adverse events tied to aspartame have been reported to the FDA, but there is little reason to give much credence to those supposed side effects, according to Fridays response.

FDA has not identified any causal link between aspartame consumption and the reported adverse events, and does not know of an established mechanism that would explain how aspartame is associated with the reported adverse events, the agency said.

One of the petitions specific concerns was that consuming aspartame results in harmful production of methanol, but the FDA said that such production is small compared to methanol that results from eating perfectly safe foods, such as apples and pears.

In any event, data reviewed by the FDA shows that methanol in aspartame or in fruits and juices does not accumulate in the body and is easily metabolized by the body's metabolic capacities, Fridays response said.

A second response posted Friday was directed at petitioner K. Paul Stoller, who in 2009 requested revocation of the aspartame regulation. Much of the response discussed a study conducted by an aspartame-focused group called the European Ramazzini Foundation, with the FDA saying that it has not been able to access full study data and that the studys integrity appears to have been compromised.

Despite your many assertions, you have not identified any scientific data or other information that would cause the agency to alter its conclusions about the safety of aspartame, the FDA wrote to Stoller.

Although aspartame has been used abundantly around the world for many years, lingering worries about its safety have forced companies that use the artificial sweetener to constantly defend the ingredient. The Coca-Cola Co., through its Beverage Institute for Health & Wellness, promotes aspartame as helpful to dieters and calls the additive "one of the most thoroughly studied food ingredients in the world."

Still, concerns have presented a business opportunity for some corporations, including Israel-based SodaStream International Ltd. Some of the company's do-it-yourself soda syrups include labeling that prominently says, No aspartame.

--Editing by Philip Shea.
________________________________________________

Martini continues:  The release says: " According to the FDA, the petition blamed incidences of brain tumors and seizures on aspartame but failed to back up its allegations with concrete data."  First of all, it was the FDA themselves who revoked the petition for approval based on the brain tumor  issue and the fact it had caused brain tumors and brain cancer in original Searle studies.  Go to my web site and read the entire 50 pages where the FDA discusses their own concern about aspartame causing brain tumors:  http://www.mpwhi.com/main.htm Scroll down to the banners. Secondly, one of the reasons the FDA tried to have G. D. Searle indicted for fraud was that as the rats developed brain tumors they would excise the tumors, put the rats back in the study and when they died they would resurrect them on paper.  Thirdly, why would anyone not think aspartame triggers brain tumors when the molecule breaks down to diketopiperazine, a brain tumor agent? 

Actually in the original report I wrote  about this release, URL above, I went into other studies and reports on the subject in detail.  Having taken the cases for over 20 years from those who suffered aspartame brain tumors I have never forgotten the case of a young 28 year attorney Kelli Motluck who had a head full of aspartame brain tumors who also discussed with me many other aspartame users she knew who had brain tumors.  G. D. Searle sold to Monsanto in 1985 and was the owner at the time Kelli called me.  In her last conversation she said to me, "I want to live, I want to live, I want to live, but if I die promise me you will tell the world Monsanto murdered me."  After her death I lectured in the UK in 2000 and in the lecture to the Green Party and press I did this. 

Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D., author of 'Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills'
says about aspartame and brain tumors on page 212 - 213:

"It is interesting to note that the first experiments done to test the safety of aspartame before its final approval in l981 disclosed a high incidence of brain tumors in the animals fed NutraSweet. In fact, this study was done by the manufacturer of NutraSweet, G. D. Searle. In this study 320 rats were fed aspartame and 120 rats were fed a normal diet and used as controls. The study lasted two years. At the end of the study twelve of the aspartame fed rats had developed brain tumors (astrocytomas), while none of the control rats had. This represented a 3.75% incidence of brain tumors in the rats fed aspartame, which was twenty-five times higher than the incidence of spontaneous brain tumors developing in rats (0.15%). "

"The study divided the rats into those exposed to low doses of aspartame and those exposed to a high dose. In the low dose group five of the rats developed brain tumors for and incidence of 3.13%. In the high dose group, seven developed brain tumors (4.38%). This indicates a dose related incidence of brain tumors. The higher the dose of aspartame, the more brain tumors were induced. "

"When Dr. John Olney pointed out these findings to the FDA "Aspartame Board of Inquiry" he was told that the high incidence of tumors was the result of spontaneous development of brain tumors in rats. That is, that some rats develop brain tumors naturally, just as humans do. Dr. Olney is a trained neuropathologist as well as a neuroscientist. He reviewed the incidence of spontaneously occurring brain tumors in rats and found that out of seven studies using a total of 59,000 rats and only 0,08% developed brain tumors - the aspartame fed rats had a forty-seven fold higher incidence. But to be fair, he even accepted G. D. Searle's references for spontaneously developing brain tumors in rats and arrives at a figure of 0.15%. This was still a twenty-five fold higher incidence in the aspartame fed rats than in the controls. "

"It was then observed that when brain tumors develop spontaneously in rats, the rate at which they appear begins to accelerate after two years of age, exactly when the Searle's study ended. Importantly, brain tumors are extremely rare before age one and one-half in the rat. So in truth the incidence of spontaneously occurring brain tumors would be even less than cited above. Yet, the aspartame fed rats developed two tumors by sixty weeks of age and five tumors by seventy weeks."

"In a collective study of 41,000 rats no tumors were seen to occur before sixty weeks and only one by seventy weeks. The fact that 320 aspartame fed rats developed six brain tumors by seventy-six weeks indicates an "incredible and unprecedented" occurrence. Within the final twenty-eight weeks of the study six more brain tumors occurred in the aspartame fed group. Dr. Olney notes that "one must assume that many more (brain tumors) would have occurred after 104 weeks. "

"It became obvious that the G. D. Searle Company was trying desperately to protect their potential billion dollar plus money maker. They claimed that more brain tumors were found because they searched the pathological slides so diligently. But, they searched just as diligently in the control rats and found none. Besides, neuropathologists examining the slides later stated that the tumors were large enough to be seen with the naked eye. "

"Because of the criticism submitted by Dr. Olney, the G. D. Searle company conducted a second study which was designed to be more comprehensive. Instead of a two-year study, this would span the entire lifetime of the rats, from intrauterine life to death. The results of this study can only be characterized as bizarre. This time they reported five brain tumors in 120 control rats (an incidence of 3.13%) and four brain tumors in 120 control rats (an incidence of 3.33%). While this was designed to show that aspartame was not the cause of the brain tumors, if accepted, the study would indicate that both groups had a brain tumor incidence thirty times higher than the known rate of spontaneous brain tumor occurrence in rats."

"But the story gets even more interesting, Dr. Olney hypothesized that one possible cause of the tumor induction was a by-product of aspartame metabolism called diketopiperazine (DKP). When nitrosated by the gut it produces a compound closely resembling a powerful brain tumor causing chemical - N-nitrosourea. "

"The G. D. Searle company conducted a separate study to test the carcinogenicity of diketopiperazine (DKP). The results of this study were not submitted to the FDA until after aspartame had already been approved for general use by the American population. This study was not a lifetime study but rather a 115 week study which consisted of feeding rats their normal feed mixed with DKP. There were 114 control animals and 216 that supposedly ate the DKP. (Not all of the animals were even examined for tumors.) There were two brain tumors in the controls (1.62% incidence) and three (1.52% in the DKP groups. But strangely enough, the incidence of brain tumors found in both groups were sixteen times higher than would be expected from spontaneous occurring tumors. That did not make sense."

"So how can we explain these strange findings? It is instructive at this point to know that in l975 the drug enforcement division of the Bureau of Foods investigated the G. D. Searle company as part of an investigation of "apparent irregularities in data collection and reporting practices." The director of the FDA at that time stated that they found "sloppy" laboratory techniques and "clerical errors, mixed-up animals, animals not getting the drugs they were supposed to get, pathological specimens lost because of improper handling, and a variety of other errors, (which) even if innocent, all conspire to obscure positive findings and produce falsely negative results."

"The drug enforcement division carried out a study under the care of agent Jerome Bressler concerning Searle's laboratory practices and data manipulation (known as the Bressler Report  He found that the feed used to test DKP had been improperly mixed so that the animals would receive only small doses of the chemical to be tested. (I have seen a photograph of the feed mix and can attest to the "sloppy" method used.) The commissioner also charged G. D. Searle company with "failure to maintain control and experimental animals on separate racks and failure to mark animals to ensure against mix-ups between experiments (animals fed aspartame and DKP) and controls." This vital and telling report was buried in a file cabinet, never to be acted on by the FDA."

"Such poor techniques would explain why both control animals and those eating aspartame had exceptionally high brain tumor rates, since they, most likely, were both eating the aspartame feed. What is ironic is that the FDA would accept studies from a company with an obvious heavy financial interest in having aspartame approved. But even more amazing is that they would depend on the same company to provide studies that they, FDA, knew beforehand were highly questionable and possibly fraudulent upon which they would make such an important public safety decision."

"Thus far, no independent studies have been done to examine this vital issue. As a neurosurgeon I see the devastating effects a brain tumor has, not only on its victim, but on the victim's family as well. To think that there is even a reasonable doubt that aspartame can induce brain tumors in the American population is frightening. And to think that the FDA has lulled them into a false sense of security is a monumental crime." (end of quotes from book)

Searle's shenanigans and fraud were so bad because they couldn't prove aspartame safe they needed help to coverup the issue so on August 4, l976 they met with the FDA and convinced them to allow them to hire a private agency, University Associated for Education in Pathology (UAREP). As described by Florence Graves (l984, page s5500 of Congressional Record l985a):

"The pathologists were specifically told that they were not to make a judgment about aspartame's safety or to look at the designs of the tests. Why did the FDA choose to have pathologists conduct an investigation when even some FDA officials acknowledged at the time that UAREP had a limited task which would only partially shed light on the validity of Searle's testing? The answer is not clear."

In other words, UAREP was sworn to silence, and how much did they get to be quiet? They received a half a million dollars!!!

Searle was intent on getting aspartame approved. They had invested 19.7 million dollars in an incomplete production facility and 9.2 million dollars in aspartame inventory. On Dec 8, l975, stockholders filed a class action lawsuit alleging that G. D. Searle had concealed information from the public regarding the nature and quality of animal research at G. D. Searle in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act (Farber l989, page 48).

Aspartame also triggered mammary, uterine, ovarian, pancreatic, testicular and thyroid tumors just for starters, not just brain tumors. There were also pituitary adenomas.

Read more...
 
Shocking Pharm Secrets & EMF Dangers to Body! Nov 7/14 Print E-mail
Friday, 07 November 2014 13:25

And this is only the beginning and scratches only the surface:


Shocking Big Pharma SECRETS Reveal Cancer Cover-up And Drug Deaths

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YK1OIuFbxuc 16 minutes

Cdsapi’s Added Comment:  A 16 minute video on the  Big Pharma criminal scandals that control “the medical care system ” in which we place our trust  -  and suffer the dire consequences..

The Corporate level of Big Pharma is rotten to the core.

Your Health is NOT the focus of their concerns.  Rather  their primary focus is Fleecing your pocket book and Creating a Marketing Strategy for Selling their drug concoctions, creating an endless conveyor belt of profits – and keeping the public sick and frightened enough to think they need them  -  masters at inventing diseases, if that creates a market for a new drug.
Remember – To Big Pharma, a Healthy population is a death knell to Profit.

What is so doubly alarming is the realization that so many professional people down the line, and politicians (with their eye on reelection finances), are willing to accept the bribes and perks, and serve compliantly in selling out the welfare of the public to these Big Pharma Cartel criminals.

Equally disturbing is the deep-seated gullibility of a public that allows itself to remain “blind-sighted” and swallows the propaganda, even when the disastrous consequential facts stare them in the face.

An aside note: This is the same Glaxo Smith Kline that was able to fabricate enough political pressure (via a totally invented series of published LIES) to demand that LANCET REMOVE  Dr. Wakefield’s Paper on the observed associations linking the MMR Vaccine (that GSK produced) to gut and brain disorders, including autism.  Also no one mentioned that Mr.Murdock, (who owned the paper that published the fabricated LIES), sat in the Board of GSK. 
99% of the media-brainwashed-public bought the scam -  which allowed GSK to get off scotfree to continue selling its vaccines (that continue to destroy the neurology of infants – with impunity and unaccountability.  
The LIES, repeated over and over again in the corporate-owned mainstream media, became “fact” in literally every discussion.  The career of a brilliant doctor was destroyed, but more importantly,
the Research into the connection between infant vaccinations and brain damage was stopped dead in its tracks.
And thus we continue to watch the exponential increase in autism and learning disabilities, extremely rare just 40 years ago, from 1 in 20,000  to now 1 in 50, and increasing annually  -  with Glaxo Smith Kline laughing all the way to the bank.
The public and the reporters have never bothered to read the thousands of published research papers in medical and scientific journals that indicate that Wakefield was indeed right – but that he had opened the
forbidden Vaccinations Pandora’s Box -  for which he, and many others, have paid, and continue to pay, the penalty..

Comment by cdsapi: Citizens Demand Scientific, Academic, Political (and Media) INTEGRITY

 

Shocking Big Pharma SECRETS Reveal Cancer Cover-up And Drug Deaths

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YK1OIuFbxuc 16 minutes

EMF Wifi Dangers to the Body in Schools!

Wireless – WiFi in our schools - the health hazard that is being ignored  -  that is destroying the neurology (the brains) of our children.

Inge’s Comment:  Even though this interview with George Carlo was done in 2012, it is even more relevant today since the installation of

Wifi in our schools still continues to  be expanded exponentially in Canada and the USA.

(in Europe, they are taking Wifi out of schools because they have identified  the hazard, and are moving to protect their children.)

When you are voting for School Board  Trustees, question them on their position on WiFi in schools – and please don’t vote for anyone

who supports the implementation of Wifi in our schools.

Please pass this down your contact list  immediately -  interview with George Carlo on health hazard of Wifi in our schools-  since

municipal voting is just a week away.

Extremely important – please take the time to listen to this interview.

This is 27 min long.

George Carlo on Wireless

Wi-Fi in Schools: Dr. George Carlo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=IgLO9yR1JlQ

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 30