|
Fracking & Chem Trails Dangers Nov 24/11
Government still blocking access to my money so donations are needed just to pay my bills please Tami
The U.S. EPA has just released test results indicating that at least one common fracking chemical has contaminated drinking water in the town of Pavillion, Wyoming. The finding is significant because the natural gas industry has long denied any systematic connection between its fracking operations and harm to water supplies, despite a growing body of anecdotal evidence. Denial has traditionally been a pretty easy call for the industry, given its exemption from chemical disclosure rules that would have definitively revealed (or disproved) any such link years ago. However, the new investigation may be only a taste of things to come, as the EPA gears up for closer scrutiny of fracking chemicals and their impacts.
Fracking and Timing
While it may be pure coincidence, the timing of EPA’s release appears to be a PR-savvy move designed to take some air out of the gas industry’s sails. On November 1, EPA issued an update on the data-gathering phase of its Hydraulic Fracturing Study report, which will attempt to get a handle on the impacts and potential risks of fracking nationwide (fracking is a drilling method that involves pumping a chemical brine underground). The final report won’t be out until 2014 but industry representatives quickly and predictably responded by accusing EPA’s methodology of being secretive and unreliable. These arguments just as quickly lost some punch just a few days later, when EPA released the results of the Pavillion investigation. That helped to focus positive attention on the agency’s credibility, through its meticulous testing and documentation of its findings.
Fracking Pollution in Pavillion, Wyoming
As reported by Abrahm Lustgarten of ProPublica, Pavillion is situated in a region of Wyoming that has seen hundreds of new gas wells drilled in the past 15 years, with 200 in the Pavillion area alone. Abrahm notes that residents started alleging a connection between the drilling and water contamination in their wells about ten years ago. Their complaints were partly borne out by EPA’s results, which revealed “alarming” levels of contamination in a Pavillion aquifer, including “high levels of cancer-causing compounds and at least one chemical commonly used in hydraulic fracturing.” However, the EPA report deals carefully with documenting the chemicals, without venturing any conclusions regarding the possible source of those chemicals.
Fracking and Earthquakes
Aside from direct water contamination, fracking can also pose a risk to water supplies through its potential for infrastructure damage. Namely, fracking has recently been linked to earthquakes, and earthquakes are not good for reservoirs, dams, aqueducts, treatment plants and water mains. Geologists are also beginning to discover that deep-ground disruptions can have far ranging and unpredictable consequences on the surface. In what could be a portent of things to come, a small lake in Pennsylvania was recently drained because of damage to its dam caused by an underground coal mine located at what would ordinarily be considered a safe distance away.
Fracking and Tar Sands
As an aside, according to Abrahm the Pavillion gas wells at the center of the residents’ problems are currently owned by the Canadian company EnCana, which continues to deny responsibility. Their experience with EnCana certainly doesn’t bode well for residents of Nebraska and other midwestern states who may have to deal with the impacts of another Canadian energy project,
TransCanada’s notorious Keystone XL Pipeline. However, that’s a moot point for now, as the State Department put a hold on the Keystone project last week, largely in response to the environmental concerns of Nebraskans.
Fracking and People
A while back, an op-ed writer for the New York Times argued that the benefits of fracking for U.S. energy policy far outweigh the risks, and the writer basically advised local residents to suck it up. That’s actually been the course of action until now, when fracking mainly took place in isolated and relatively underpopulated rural areas. Combined with the industry’s disclosure exemptions, that made it difficult if not impossible to assemble an accurate picture of the impact of fracking on a national scale. The situation is quite different now that a gas-rich formation of shale called the Marcellus has been discovered in and around the Appalachian region. EnCan may have temporarily patched Pavillion’s problems by hauling in a few cisterns for drinking water, but you’re talking about an awful lot of cisterns should problems arise in parts of the Marcellus, which for starters includes Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York.
Via: Cleantechnica
http://volumatrixgroup.com/2011/11/14/busted-fracking-chemical-found-in-wyoming-water-supply/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+volumatrixgroup%2FNXFN+%28Volumatrix+Group+%29
Chem Trails & Weather Modification Proof Nov 23/11
For anyone still “on the fence” about weather modification / manipulation :
all links below should satisfy MOST questions: save the pdf’s before they’re gone for good from the net!
A few of the HAARP patents:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26517997/Us-Patent-Harrp-5041834#fullscreen:on
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4686605.pdf
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4712155.pdf
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5038664.pdf
download the Airforce “owning the weather by 2025 document from the military website here:
http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf
http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/concepts/11ta_ndx.htm
US laws regarding weather modification:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/12896975/US-Law-Weather-Modification-Experimenting
http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/15C9A.txt
more military sites covering HAARP:
http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=21914
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA134923
US Navy involved:
http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=1610
the USGS seeding the clouds to make it snow:
http://water.usgs.gov/wrri/09grants/progress/2009WY46B.pdf
A few of the weather modification COMPANIES in operation today inside the USA:
http://www.wtwma.com
http://www.weathermodification.com
http://www.weathermodification.org/
http://www.just-clouds.com/
Here is a very long list of links, pdf files from institutions like stanford, leicester university, cornell, University of Mass., etc.. and from several military and .gov sites.
they are easy to read.. yes there is a lot of math formula — you can read the thesis etc, and get a VERY good idea of the topic and what is being covered.
Even the average non-science minded person can understand these documents in their basic form.
some links work, others are “down” but still included to prove they DID exist. These things have a way of disappearing off the net, so download them and MIRROR them on other file sharing sites if you can.
*******************************************
University of Leicester — Ionospheric Heating
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19980211033937/http://ion.le.ac.uk/index.html
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19980211032156/http://ion.le.ac.uk/heating/Heating.html
precipitation “enhancement”
http://www.asr.ucar.edu/2004/RAP/precipitation-enhancement.htm
Defense Secretary from the 1990′s William Cohen speaking on the subject of HAARP –
http://www.defense.gov/Transcripts/Transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=674
the USGS EAARL:
http://ngom.usgs.gov/dsp/tech/eaarl/
ocean based haarp Buoy:
http://www-star.stanford.edu/~vlf/buoy/
electronic warfare :
http://www.onr.navy.mil/~/media/Files/Funding-Announcements/BAA/2011/11-006.ashx
lower ionosphere heating:
http://www-star.stanford.edu/~vlf/publications/2008-03.pdf
AWESOME network:
http://nova.stanford.edu/~vlf/IHY_Test/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Transmitters.Transmitters
(several years up to 2007)
http://vlf-alexandria.stanford.edu/live_spec_secure/chistochina/live_from_chistochina.html
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20061229014910/http://ion.le.ac.uk/heating/history_of_rf_heating.html
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20061229011401/http://ion.le.ac.uk/heating/6Feb.html
Sura Ionospheric Heating Facility
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sura_Ionospheric_Heating_Facility
The EISCAT Associates
(A lot of info on this site, captured from the late 90′s)
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19980210065153/http://seldon.eiscat.no/eiscat.html
France, Finland, Germany, Japan, Norway, Sweden, UK
*Incoherent scatter radars
(Below)
*Ionospheric Heating
Their Facility -
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19980210071758/http://seldon.eiscat.no/heater.html
EISCAT Headquarters are located at Kiruna in Sweden
The EISCAT Scientific Association,
Headquarters,
PO Box 812,
S-981 28 KIRUNA
Sweden
Incoherent Scatter Facilities
Operational Incoherent Scatter Radars
Jicamarca, Peru
http://jicamarca.ece.cornell.edu/
Arecibo, Puerto Rico
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19961105195521/http:/naic.edu/
(click on a Layman’s guide for info on “probing the ionosphere” and “modifiying the ionosphere locally”
Millstone Hill, USA
(Haystack)
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19970710073509/http://www.haystack.edu/homepage.html
Pic of Haystack facility and more info:
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19990116225557/http://www.haystack.edu/haystack/haystack.html
Sondrestromfjord, Greenland
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19990224220742/http://128.18.44.75/iono/issfsond.html
EISCAT, Norway/Sweden/Finland
(Main EISCAT Site)
EISCAT Svalbard Radar, Svalbard (First operations late in 1995)
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19961117043355/http://seldon.eiscat.no/ESR_intro.html
Kharkov, Ukraine
http://www-radiophys.univer.kharkov.ua/space/
(search for scatter)
Irkutsk, Russia
The Institute possesses a complex of unique astrophysical equipment deployed in the Sayan Mountains, especially the Siberian solar radiotelescope, a large solar vacuum telescope, an incoherent scatter radar, as well as a network of astrophysical laboratories throughout the territory of Siberia.
http://www.irkutsk.org/acad/acad_e.htm
http://ursi.org/Proceedings/ProcGA05/pdf/GP2.3%280511%29.pdf
Upper Ionosphere changes HF (high frequency) into ULF (ultra low frequency)
here is a video explanation of the documents:
In essence.. this shows that “they” can send a HF (high frequency) signal into the upper ionosphere with HAARP, and it “transforms” into a ULF ultra low frequency… and vice versa.. a LOW frequency modulates into the HIGH frequency!
here is the link to the “Efficiency scaling” HF transformation into ULF/VLF/ELF via the ionosphere.
http://www.ursi.org/Proceedings/ProcGA02/papers/p0936.pdf
here is the link to the “HAARP description pdf” I am showing…
http://foia.abovetopsecret.com/ultimate_UFO/Advanced/HAARPResearchAndApplicat…
MU, Japan
http://www-lab26.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp/study/mu/mu_e.html
http://www.rish.kyoto-u.ac.jp/radar-group/local/isr/EISCAT/is-methods.html
USA (Besides HAARP)
UCLA’s
HIPAS — High Power Aural Stimulation Observatory
Located near Fairbanks Alaska
“Eight antennas like those in the picture are used to modify the ionosphere with high power radio waves near Fairbanks, Alaska. Radio wave soundings, optical diagnostics and other techniques are used to probe the ionosphere.”
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/19970722053407/http://www.physics.ucla.edu/~hipas/index.html
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20010217055634/http://www.hipas.alaska.edu/index.html
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20010405061931/http://www.hipas.alaska.edu/intro.html
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20010406093357/http://www.hipas.alaska.edu/diagnostics.html
http://ulcar.uml.edu/stationmap.html
http://ulcar.uml.edu/stationlist.html
http://159.226.23.71/
http://carbon.ucdenver.edu/~mgolkows/Publications/RF2010.pdf
http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/21659
www.physics.irfu.se/Publications/Articles/StubbeEtAl:JGR:1984.pdf
http://www.polar.umd.edu/haarp/riometer_paper/node3.html#SECTION00030000000000000000
http://www.polar.umd.edu/haarp/riometer_paper/node2.html#SECTION00020000000000000000
http://www-star.stanford.edu/~vlf/buoy/
http://www-star.stanford.edu/~vlf/buoy/systems.html
http://www-star.stanford.edu/~vlf/buoy/location.html
http://www-star.stanford.edu/~vlf/buoy/Documents/feasibilityStudyReport.pdf
CERN and HAARP –
http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1305357
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1011.1458.pdf
http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1003294/files/0612038.pdf
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0101034
http://www.google.nl/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=11&ved=0CBkQFjAAOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.calvin.edu%2F~pribeiro%2Fcourses%2Fengr302%2FSamples%2Fhaarp.ppt&rct=j&q=site%3A.edu%20haarp&ei=2fSmTaHpBIXsObOFqOQJ&usg=AFQjCNGC6l-oBQ2pkqbF6rzm353iRZjieA&sig2=
http://books.google.com/books?id=wUoEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA52&lpg=PA52&dq=Irving+Langmuir+rainmaker&source=bl&ots=Ehqq8hZNsE&sig=tkN51NoxqMsKVq6ClZU9Hvej8g0&hl=en&ei=9mhMTO3vG93llQfjpJHGDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CCIQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=FVMEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA113&dq=Irving+Langmuir&as_pt=MAGAZINES&cd=1#v=onepage&q=Irving%20Langmuir&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=G7t260XD8AYC&pg=PA47&dq=stormfury&hl=en&ei=9wJOTOfVE4G88gbZ3IGaDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=stormfury&f=false
These shots below come from a Navy .mil website .. clearly showing the “HAARP ring” patter and circumference ..
http://wwwppd.nrl.navy.mil/whatsnew/haarp/
“By modulating the ambient current flowing in the ionosphere, e.g., the auroral electrojet, it is possible to generate extremely low frequency (ELF) and very low frequency (VLF) radiation. This ionospheric modification technique can provide such waves for probing both the Earth and the ionosphere- magnetosphere. The modification occurs in the lower D-region and can provide information about the ambient conditions in one of the least diagnosed regions of the ionosphere.
The electrojet is modulated by using a high frequency heater (a few MHZ) with the power modulated at the desired ELF/VLF frequency to heat the ionospheric electrons in the lower D-region. Figure 1a shows a sketch of the heater and heated region. The heated region is typically at 75 km (though this depends upon the carrier frequency) and can be 30 km in diameter and a few km thick. Viewed from above (see Figure 1b) the heated region is a roughly circular patch. The smoothness of the heated region depends upon the antenna radiation pattern as well as D-region conditions. The heating increases the electron-neutral collision rate which changes the conductivities. Since on ELF time scales the ambient electric field is constant, modulating the conductivity produces a current modulated at the same frequency. At these altitudes the conductivity change is predominantly in the Hall conductivity. If the ambient electric field, E, is in ±y direction, a time varying current perturbation is generated, j, in the ±x direction (Fig. 1b). The time varying current launches waves both up and down the Earth’s magnetic field. In the simulations shown here, we start with a time-varying current and study the downward propagating waves and how they couple into the Earth-ionospheric wave guide.
Animations
The animations show 5 different representations of the same simulation. The simulation uses a time-varying current perturbation (1 kHz) in the D-region at 75 km. The current is in the magnetic east-west direction. The Earth’s magnetic field is vertical. The simulation box is 1800 by 1800 by 120 km. Isosurfaces are shown for the absolute value of the horizontal magnetic field ABSB and of the vertical electric field ABSEZ. Also shown is the east-west magnetic field in the near-field BX1 and in the far-field BX2. Since the field amplitude falls off with distance, BX1 uses a order-of-magnitude larger isosurface value than BX2 to emphasize the field close to the site. The north- south magnetic field is shown in BY1 and BY2. These plots look slightly different from the absolute value plots where both the positive and negative surfaces were shown. Also BX and BY do have a different orientation of the their radiation patterns. The direction of the radiation is determined by the total horizontal field shown in ABSB and by the vertical electric field shown in ABSEZ. The radiation pattern in the earth-ionosphere waveguide is a combination of a linear dipole antenna and a right-hand circular antenna. At ELF frequencies because of low D-region absorption the dipole is dominant. The dipole radiates in the magnetic east-west direction.
Because 1 kHz is below cutoff the mode in the waveguide is a TEM mode. The mode consists of a horizontal B field perpendicular to the direction of propagation and a vertical electric field. With perfect conductors, the mode is uniform in the vertical direction. As the wave propagates in the waveguide, the top of the wave is approximately at the bottom of the ionosphere. Above the heated region, waves are also launched along the Earth’s magnetic field. In the near-field ( BX1 and BY1) one can see the pulse being radiated downward. It strikes the ground and reflects back up to the ionosphere. Part of the energy propagates up the field lines into the ionosphere. This is the bubble seen rising up. The D-region is highly collisional and damps this wave. Looking at BX2 and BY2 one can see that the energy mainly stays in the waveguide. If one looks closely at the top of the wave in the waveguide the wave appears to be curved. The waveguide mode is coupling into the bottom of the D-region and driving a whistler mode up the field lines. The whistlers have a much lower velocity than the waveguide mode and can only propagate along the field lines. This acts to curve the top of the waves. These waves help form the bubble that propagates up the field line. Because of this, the diameter of the bubble is much larger than the heated region.
Above the heated region in ABSEZ one can see a pair of coils revolving around each other. These are the currents that flow up and down the Earth’s magnetic field forming the current loops associated with the waves propagating up the field lines. Finally, EZ1 is a blow-up of the high-altitude portion of the vertical electric field for positive values of the electric field; the current loop is more clearly seen.”
Simulations of ELF radiation generated by heating the high-latitude D- region
H.L. Rowland, Beam Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
“This ionospheric modification technique can provide such waves for probing both the Earth and the ionosphere- magnetosphere.”
http://wwwppd.nrl.navy.mil/whatsnew/haarp/
Ionospheric modification and ELF/VLF
wave generation by HAARP
http://nlpc.stanford.edu/nleht/Science/talks/ursi_jan06.pdf
HAARP JOINT SERVICES PROGRAM PLANS AND ACTIVITIES: Air Force Geophysics Laboratory and Office of Naval Research, February 1990 (PDF)
http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2009/07/haarp_1990.pdf
Link obtained from:
http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/17-08/mf_haarp?currentPage=all
Popular Mechanics Magazine:
The World’s 18 Strangest Military Bases
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/engineering/architecture/strangest-military-bases-gallery
HAARP Research Station – not much info, but says:
“In past interviews, HAARP’s operators readily admit they’re researching potential defense applications.”
Modification of the Ionosphere by VLF Wave-Induced Electron Precipitation
http://vlf.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Doolittle%20PhD%20Dissertation.pdf
Title : A Diagnostic System for Studying Energy Partitioning and Assessing the Response of the Ionosphere During HAARP Modification Experiments.
|