Galactic Friends Updates
Monday, 25 November 2013 22:16
10 Banned Foods Nov 26/13
Below are 10 American foods that are banned elsewhere.
#1: Farm-Raised Salmon
Farm-raised fish is usually fed an unnatural diet of genetically engineered (GE) grains, antibiotics and chemicals unsafe for humans. To mask the resulting grayish flesh, they¹re given toxic and potentially eyesight-damaging synthetic astaxanthin.
To determine wild from farm-raised salmon (sold in most restaurants), wild sockeye gets its red color from natural astaxanthin and carotenoids. The white ³fat strips² are thin, meaning it¹s lean. Pale pink fish and wide fat marks are a sign of farmed salmon.
Avoid ³Atlantic Salmon.² Look for ³Alaskan² or ³sockeye,² which is illegal to farm and has very high astaxanthin concentrations.
Where it¹s banned: Australia and New Zealand
#2: Genetically Engineered Papaya
Most Hawaiian papaya is genetically engineered to be ringspot virus-resistant. But research shows animals fed GE foods like corn and soy suffer intestinal damage, multiple-organ damage, massive tumors, birth defects, premature death and/or nearly complete sterility by the third generation. Dangers to humans are unknown.
Where it¹s banned: The European Union
#3: Ractopamine-Tainted Meat
About 45 percent of US pigs, 30 percent of cattle and an unknown percentage of turkeys are plumped with the asthma drug ractopamine before slaughter. Up to 20 percent of ractopamine is still there when you buy it.
Since 1998, more than 1,700 US pork lovers have been ³poisoned² this way. For this very health threat, ractopamine-laced meats are banned in 160 different countries! Russia issued a ban on US meat imports, effective February 11, 2013, until it¹s certified ractopamine-free. In animals, it¹s linked to reducedreproductive function, increased mastitis and increased death. It damages the human cardiovascular system and may cause hyperactivity, chromosomal abnormalities and behavioral changes. Currently, US meats aren¹t even tested for it.
Where it¹s banned: 160 countries across Europe, Russia, mainland China and Republic of China (Taiwan).
#4: Flame Retardant Drinks
Mountain Dew and other drinks in the US contain the synthetic chemical brominated vegetable oil (BVO), originally patented as a flame retardant.
BVO bioaccumulates in human tissue and breast milk; animal studies report reproductive and behavioral problems. Bromine alters the central nervous and endocrine systems and promotes iodine deficiency, causing skin rashes, acne, loss of appetite, fatigue and cardiac arrhythmias. The featured article explains:
³The FDA has flip-flopped on BVO¹s safety, originally classifying it as Œgenerally recognized as safe,¹ but reversing that call, now defining it as an Œinterim food additive,¹ a category reserved for possibly questionable substances used in food.²
Where it¹s banned: Europe and Japan
#5: Processed Foods and Artificial Food Dyes
More than 3,000 preservatives, flavorings and colors are added to US foods, many of which are banned in other countries. Thefeatured article noted:
³Boxed Mac & Cheese, cheddar flavored crackers, Jell-O and many kids¹ cereals contain red 40, yellow 5, yellow 6 and/or blue 2 Š (which) can cause behavioral problems as well as cancer, birth defects and other health problems in laboratory animals. Red 40 and yellow 6 are also suspected of causing an allergy-like hypersensitivity reaction in children. The Center for Science in the Public Interest reports that some dyes are also ³contaminated with known carcinogens.²
In countries where these food dyes are banned, companies like Kraft employ natural colorants like paprika extract and beetroot.
Where it¹s banned: Norway and Austria. Britain advised companies against using food dyes by the end of 2009. The European Union requires a warning notice on most foods containing dyes.
#6: Arsenic-Laced Chicken
Arsenic-based drugs are approved in US-produced animal feed because they cause animals to grow quicker and meats products to look pinker and ³fresher.² The FDA says arsenic-based drugs are safe safe because they contain organic arsenic Š But organic arsenic can turn into inorganic arsenic, run through contaminated manure and leach into drinking water.
The European Union has never approved using arsenic in animal feed; US environmental groups have sued the FDA to remove them.
Where it¹s banned: The European Union
#7: Bread with Potassium Bromate
Bread, hamburger and hotdog buns are ³enriched² with potassium bromate, or bromide, linked to kidney and nervous system damage, thyroid problems, gastrointestinal discomfort and cancer.
Monday, 25 November 2013 22:15
Banker Employer Break Laws & Ben Fulford report! Nov 26/13
More illegal complicity to violate our rights by the sheeple people! T
Bank info... reservation of rights.... pdf file
UCC 1-207 Review
It's so important to know and understand the meaning of "Without Prejudice, UCC 1- 207," in connection with your signature, that we should go over this once more. It's very likely that a judge will ask you what it means. So please learn and understand and be able to explain it carefully:
The use of "Without prejudice UCC 1-207," in connection with my signature indicates that I have reserved my Common Law right not to be compelled to perform under any contract that I did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not accept the liability associated with the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.
Once you state that, it's all the judge needs to hear. Under the Common Law, a contract must be entered into knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally, by both parties, or it can be declared void and unenforceable. You are claiming the right not to be compelled to perform under any contract that you did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. And you do not accept the liability associated with the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or agreement.
The compelled benefit is the privilege to use Federal Reserve Notes to discharge your debts with limited liability rather than to pay your debts with silver coins. It's a compelled benefit, because there are no silver coins in circulation. You have to eat, and you can only buy food with the medium of exchange provided by the government. You are not allowed to print your own money, so you are compelled to use theirs. This is the compelled benefit of an unrevealed commercial agreement. If you have not made a valid, timely and explicit reservation of your rights under UCC 1-207, and you simply exercise this benefit rendered by government, you will be obligated, under an implied agreement, to obey every statute, ordinance and regulation passed by government, at all levels - federal, state and local.
See UCC 1-201. General Definitions (3) "Agreement" means the bargain of the parties in fact as found in their language or by implication from other circumstances including course of dealing or usage of trade or course of performance..."
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER INFORMATION
Let us briefly discuss the issue of the employee providing a Social Security number to the employer. We must take a practical and constitutional approach to this issue.
What possible reason could there be for the employer to require the NON-TAXPAYER employee to furnish a Social Security number? The average payroll clerk would claim the number was needed so the employer would withhold Social Security taxes, undoubtedly.But if the employee's job description does not involve any revenue taxable activity,he is not subject to any of these indirect taxes under any circumstances. The right to lawfully contract one's own labor to engage in innocent and harmless activities for lawful compensation cannot be (and therefore has not been) taxed for revenue purposes. Surely, the free exercise of such a constitutionally secured right cannot be limited only to those individuals who furnish a number. Surely there can be no act of Congress which would require such a number to be furnished by a NON-TAXPAYER.
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 491. The Internal Revenue Code does indeed contain sections requiring a Social Security number from those who ARE subject to an internal revenue tax, but the NONTAXPAYER is without the scope of the revenue laws.
Many people in the "freedom movement" have tried to obtain jobs without giving a Social Security number, only to have the employer quote a section from the Internal Revenue Code. This, of course, is not a valid reason in the case of a non-taxpayer because the revenue laws relate only to "taxpayer(s)" as defined. If an employer believes there is requirement for a non-taxpayer to furnish a Social Security number, the burden of proof rests with the employer - NOT the NON-TAXPAYER. The employer will have a difficult time here because the number can only be required from those subject to the tax (WHICH ALMOST NONE OF YOU REALLY ARE!!). Even if the employee provided a number to the employer, it still does not make the employee subject to the tax. The furnishing of a number does not change a non-taxable activity into a taxable activity. It's the nature of the activity that creates the liability.
Let us look back to the Helvering Case now. After discussing Title VIII in the Helvering Case, the U. S. Supreme Court next discusses Title II of the act. "Title II has the caption 'Federal Old-Age Benefits.' The benefits are of two types, first, monthly pensions, and second, lump sum payments, the payments of the second class being relatively few and unimportant.
"The first section of this title creates an account in the United States Treasury Account -201. No present appropriation, however, is made to that account. All that the statute does is to authorize appropriations annually thereafter... Not a dollar goes into the Account by force of the challenged act alone, unaided by acts to follow."
It's now obvious, that none of the money collected from the so-called Social Security taxes goes directly into any special account. The only way money gets into the above mentioned account is when Congress appropriates money from the general Treasury. When the public is told that the Social Security account is depleted, it's only because Congress has not appropriated sufficient funds from the general Treasury to keep the account solvent.
Money collected in so-called Social Security taxes goes into the general Treasury fund, and, no longer being identifiable, is spent along with the rest of the moneys collected. Pay attention to the arguments from the politicians regarding the status of the Social Security System and REALLY hear what it is they are quarreling about. If Congress chooses to appropriate funds for Social Security benefits, it can. However, if there is no legal claim that can be made upon the funds by the "taxpayer(s)" (as defined) who have paid the so-called Social Security taxes. The payment of taxes into the general Treasury is completely separable from Congress's choice in how and where public funds are to be spent.
Congress may impose taxes on all legitimate subjects of taxation. If it's a direct tax, it shall be apportioned. If it is an indirect tax (duty, impost or excise), it shall be uniform. HOWEVER, and here is another one I bet you didn't think of, CONGRESS CAN LAWFULLY ONLY SPEND MONEY FOR PURPOSES AUTHORIZED BY THE U. S. CONSTITUTION!!!
"The Congress shall have Power to Lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States." - U. S. Constitution, Article I, sec. 8, cl. 1.
Providing the spending is deemed to be for the common defense and/or the general welfare of the nation, such spending is within the bounds of the Constitution. On the other hand, if the spending is deemed to be for the welfare of specific persons, as opposed to the general welfare of the nation, then the spending is not within the bounds of the Constitution, and therefore the spending is unconstitutional.
If such spending of public funds for the so-called Social Security benefits is deemed to be for the general welfare of the nation, then such spending is within the bounds of the Constitution. The recipients are entitled to the benefits provided by congressional appropriations, regardless of the sources of revenue from which the general Treasury obtained the taxes.
The tax paid into the Treasury is exactly that; a tax. Moneys appropriated from the general Treasury and subsequently spent on general welfare is exactly that; general welfare. The point being that it's actually frivolous for a person to say that because he paid so-called Social Security taxes, he has the right to Social Security benefits. The two are separable, which was one of the main purposes of the separability clause in the Social Security Act, at - 1103.
Unfortunately, the common misunderstanding of Social Security by the American working men and women is of such magnitude that there will be many who will not believe what they have read here and will not want to believe it even if they go to a law library and get copies of the court cases cited. I KNOW this because this information has already been available since at least 1986. Further, for a much longer time it has been available in other formats which work from a different standpoint, but nonetheless do work. YOU ARE CONTROLLED BY LIES AND FEAR - NOT BY THE
CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS OF YOUR LAND. There will, however, be Americans who are researching the court cases in an attempt to get to the bottom of the "taxing" problems and lies facing the American working men and women. Will it not be wondrous when the day of profound lies and enactment through force will be put behind us as a nation and people?
Before appropriating any public funds, Congress is to judge if the spending is for the general welfare of the nation. As you read the various court cases, you will find that the courts will not interfere with Congress's judgment if by any reasonable possibility the spending is for general welfare.
If providing Social Security checks every month to retired millionaires is deemed to be for the general welfare of the nation, then such spending is indeed lawful and constitutional. If, on the other hand, such spending is deemed not to be for the general welfare of the nation, then such spending is an unlawful and unconstitutional conversion of public funds, and, most surely constitutes criminal behavior. But then, didn't the millionaire also probably contribute to that account? Can anyone in the possession of even a portion of their proper faculties honestly contend that this type of spending is for the general welfare of the nation?
It would appear, however, that the questions as to the constitutionality of the spending of public funds for the particular purposes are NOT being directly raised before Congress or the courts. When the fundamental principles of constitutional taxation and constitutional spending are better understood by the American working men and women, these issues will then, and only then, be properly raised by the citizens to Congress in addition to being raised profoundly in the courts.
Great numbers of people want to do away with Social Security because they see that it is wrong, badly managed and the ones presently paying the costs will likely not have benefits later. Others, of course, want to keep the programs because of their well justified fear that many of the elderly and poor would not otherwise have any resources of funds with which to sustain themselves. Look carefully, though, for you can see from the Supreme Court cases, the taxing provisions are completely separate from the provisions for appropriating public funds for general welfare.
Stated differently, Congress can lawfully appropriate funds for the general welfare of the nation if they so choose - and have done so constantly without your even taking note. It also can tax all lawful subjects of taxation - and you who are not subject to the taxation have somehow convinced yourselves to donate (voluntarily contribute) according to the rates provided plus penalties for not donating enough.
Congress can even utilize its power to direct taxation, which it has not implemented in over 100 years, I suppose because all of you NON-TAXPAYERS keep donating and contributing so freely according to their needs and rates. I can find no other reason for sending your money and filling out forms, etc., for actually you do so most unlawfully when you are not even "eligible" as a "taxpayer."
While it's obvious that millions of working folks are having money withheld from their wages under the guise, pretext, sham and subterfuge of withholding so-called Social Security taxes, this unlawful, unconstitutional deprivation of property can come to an abrupt halt without jeopardizing the welfare of the truly needy. Congress will still have the power to obtain sufficient revenue from the lawful subjects of taxation and the needs of the nation can still be met quite constitutionally and you the people can keep total tabs on it.
It's glaringly apparent that you must take action for all of the programs which are for general welfare, along with those where spending is done under the mere guise of general welfare, need to be fully reconsidered and the programs totally overhauled. However, the American people will not be able to give clear and meaningful instructions to their public servants in Congress until the American people themselves have an understanding of the constitutional principles of taxation and the constitutional principles which apply to the use of "public" funds.
Much needs to be done to stop the illegal acts of those employers who are willfully,knowingly, corruptly and unlawfully withholding part of their employee' wages under the guise, pretext, sham and subterfuge of "withholding taxes" in the cases where the employee's job descriptions do not involve any revenue taxable activity (which is the category within which almost ALL of you belong). The employers must know that the revenue laws only apply to those who are engaged in revenue taxable activities; i. e., unlawful, harmful and non-innocent. They must know
that the withholding of ANY funds under the guise of taxation from those who are NON-TAXPAYERS and are not subject to the tax is totally and blatantly illegal. It's only because of lack of knowledge on the part of the working men and women that this CRIME continues on and on and on, unabated.
We will point out another point of interest to these employers: THEY WILL FIND
QUITE EMPHATICALLY THAT THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WILL NOT COME TO THEIR AID WHEN THEY ARE SUED BY THE DAMAGED NONTAXPAYER EMPLOYEE; providing such nontaxpayer presents himself as a nontaxpayer as described in the Economy Case, and not as a "taxpayer" as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.
Truth & Growth Education
Monday, 25 November 2013 15:49
RV TNT Recaps Nov 25/13
I have not bought Dinar in Canada. I do not know of any 1800 numbers for Canada. No one has given me the courtesy of aquiring this information for Canada. I have posted USA information due to the fact that most of the purchasers are in US. Please go to your purchaser to get any cash out information or 1800 numbers if they are available in Canada. All major Banks in Canada should be able to cash out for you. I am not your banker or consultant so please do your own due diligence in these matters. I have shared good advice here and other update section for what to do when you get to the banks so go there for my generous updates so far. thanks Tami
11-25-13 TNT TONY CC (Notes by FlPatriot59 at I4U): TONY = T | CALLER = C
TONY - Good morning, TNT. It's Monday, November 25 at 1:04 PM. Guys, this is a really special call. I was just informed my DC handler is on the call.
T - Yes, I am excited! It's still going to be a superfantastic day! I have NO bad news for you today. Everything is still on track and there is still a deadline. And I'm going to give it to you today on the call. I hate when you guys have bad weekends, but I don't like to come on and tell you stuff when I don't have anything new to report.
T - I want to clear up a few things first. Mrs. Renfroe has been coming on the board as "Admin." This happened to her over the weekend. When we do a call, I don't know why but people come on our call and, with 23,000 people on the Friday call, not counting the calls connected to the calls. We also had 7-8K on the radio. We're reaching 20-30K with the info. People were taking comments on our calls, dissecting them, then putting just parts of the info on Recaps.
T - Whether they're using it to credit or discredit, what good is any of it? Mrs. Renfro said some things that were misinterpreted over the weekend, that I was losing faith since I know what's going on. I'm not losing faith in this since I know what's really going on. We are in the moment. There was a lot of controversy on OMC with Ray on other sites. If you do not hear it from me directly then do not believe it.
T - It should be more about the info, the process and help we can bring to the people, and less about Tony. Let's get the info out and help people and get them prepared. Some are just holding calls and creating their own boards to counter what I'm saying, to dispute my info. If they don't have the vision to see where they're going, they just tell you don't listen to Tony. That has to be one boring, ignorant call. This is a fluid situation. a global one that deals with governments.
T - It takes an adult to understand this. If you can tell me exactly why it's not going to happen, then I'm all in. Not agreeing is not creating a controversy. You don't have to agree. I'm all for that. Sometimes I don't even agree with what they tell me. But then I tell you guys too. We're going through the process together. Every M/W/F we're all learing something. We just need to know HOW to disagree.
PAM - You don't know but you're being blasted worldwide by a listener in Germany who has his own radio station, http://www.studio-chiemsee.de/JR.
T - Okay, now for the information. This is what we know for sure. We do know, regardless of what you're hearing, all my contacts and sources, from DC, CBI, IMF, the marketplace, to military to contractors and citizens, all know for a fact that there are cards in Iraq loaded at 3.44. I don't care what anybody else is saying, they may not have gottent their cards yet. I think it's a case of where the RV/RI has been completed. But the international RV has not been activated yet. At one time there were 3 different prices in the marketplaces and now they have 1 price based on the 3.44 rate.
T - Iraq has completed everything they needed to do. Their portion has been completed. They are waiting on US now. The UST received everything they needed from the IMF LAST TUESDAY (rates and paperwork). It was supposed to be processed and they were going to do it themselves but there were security issues with people moving money within 5 seconds of them activating it ($5B). Our top level people were informed on Thursday they were going to do it this way in a randomizer and it would go through and pop up.
T - Even tho we heard that, in our little intel group, we wondered why if they said it would randomly pop from Thursday thru Sunday night. So we stressed Sunday night - how random is that? Anyway, we go through Sunday night, MOnday night and it's not done yet. It's done in the sense that the mechanics and signatures are done. All we need now are the numbers to be released to the general public. But that's what we've been waiting on since last Thursday.
T - Right now there is a meeting going on between the 3-letter agencies to decide the final time, which is from RIGHT NOW thru tomorrow morning at 9AM EST. We don't know the exact time but that's what we're getting. We know they are listening to the calls, like they were on Friday and one is with us today.
T - On the boards there is a new chat started that Tony is being controlled by the cabal. Am I giving you the info? Yes. Do you need it? Yes. I still go through it to see if it makes sense. The only thing you don't know is the window. It doesn't matter, because things are being switched around. Why did it get extended another day? I can't tell you but they've said "enough is enough." IT WILL BE DONE BY THANKSGIVING. Even if the UST doesn't the IMF will do it and the rate will go to the 3.44 rate.
T - As of Tuesday, the UST has been the hold-up. If that's the case and they continue to do that we lose the higher rate. As of this moment we have the higher rates. If it drops to the lower rate it's still higher than we ever thought we'd get. 3.44 still works. I'm just hoping it goes at the top rate. It definitely is going. They need it for the holiday season. The banks said they can't make it through the week without the RV.
T - Mr. DC, is there anything else I need to say? Mr. DC - no. T - He's our handler and the one who gets us answers within an hour. Mr. DC - I'm not a handler, but I've just been assigned to you. I'm a normal, everyday guy like everybody else.
Q&A FROM CHAT ROOM NOW...
Q - How many zeros have been dropped from the ZIM? A - 6
Q - Can we use initial cashout to payoff reserves? "Birdman" came on chat and said if we buy more dinar we'd be blacklisted. He said we'd be blacklisted if we payoff reserves with a $25K note. A - If you even think this is possible you should burn your dinar right now. If the gov't didn't want you buying it why wouldn't they be shut down in an instant. All it takes is one letter like 13303 to stop this. They don't need to put people out there like these conspiracy theorists. If we're going to be blacklisted then who will cash-out?
T - Mr. DC what do you say? Mr. DC - I think you nailed it. T - Tell them to show you one document, conversation, one agency to say that's right. Whoever puts that out - don't ever believe them going forward. I have HIGH, HIGH intel sources and that's not happening.
Q - Where will we be taxed? A - Your home state.
Q - If the UST does this what about the peopel who already cashed out at the higher rates? A - People have already exchanged at the higher rates. That means if it goes with the UST, it has to come out at that rate. Otherwise, there will be a clawback position. Don't worry about getting in. Because it wasn't done when it was supposed to be done, they're trying to get everyone done in 2 days. They would like to get just the people with the single notes done first. The rest of you can wait until your appointment, they're asking if you could do that.
T - They're trying to get this done before Thanksgiving. The rates should remain high at least the first couple of days.
Q - Is the Iran situation having an impact on this? A - No. Mr. DC - bottom line, not much to know. The Iranian thing has been in the works for some time. The GCR is seen as a stabilizing force in the region so it will help.
Mr. DC - Regarding the Iran situation, knowing this in advance they've been working on this for a while. It's an initial step and not definitive if it will stop them from enriching uranium - it's a step in that direction. The GCR is a stabilizing force in the region. There are very poor people pulled into extreme venues.
T - What can you (MR. DC) say about the cards? MR. DC - Contractors have had them since August. Others had them too. Tests have been done since June. The gov't checks had 3.44. Everybody gets them. Payrolls are now being paid out at 3.44 rate with deductions. The Iraqi people are confused as well. Most of the Iraq people have it on their cards. They are seeing 1166 on the CBI and their friends are seeing this as well. So it's even more confusing and has been for a long time.
Q - Why is the IQN the deciding factor with the other currencies? A - The Iraqi dinar is the foundation for the GCR. No other country is giving up what they're worth and what they did. MR. DC - We don't see this on the news because they don't want you to know some things. There are greater implications. A lot of it is done behind the scenes and has been worked on for 10 years. If you're in Iraq they're very aware of it. It's very public there and in the Arab countries. It's scrolling on their screens.
Q - Is 5/3 Bank still involved? A - Yes.
T - Don't just call all the 800#s to make appointments you won't keep. Someone was trying to open a WF account online and did not complete the process. But he received an email from them. He called WF and they discovered it was a fraud - phishing. If you don't want the bad guys getting your email address, get a new one. Separate yourself from all of this. Don't use the same email address.
"LIVE" CALL-IN STARTING NOW... C = CALLER | T = TONY
C - You said DC was in a meeting. Why if it's set in a computer? T - They said it's in a randomizer, yet they said don't look for it until Sunday night. That means it really wasn't random and we waited for Sunday night. But since it didn't happen we can determine someone is picking the time and it's not random. Someone was given a new job and they have until 9AM tomorrow to make it happen. If it doesn't CL will do it.
C - Why would the USA jeopardize the high rates? T - I don't know. It doesn't make sense. MR. DC - It's clearly within the UST's hands. Nobody knows exactly why it hasn't gone. It has never been explained to anyone. T - What is going on right now is an explanation and final determination. That's what the meeting is about now.
C - What happens if not by Thanksgiving? T - That tells me right now we've been given mis-information supposedly by those who did not want it, but now they want it. I'll now when the meeting is over in a few hours or by 9AM tomorrow. It's all completed. The UST has had it since last Tuesday and the banks have had the 800#s since Thursday.
C - If this goes to CL will the VNN be affected as well? T - Yes, they will scale down all the rates. Nobody wants that to happen.
C - My biggest concern is that the UST has been the holdup yet they've let certain ones exchange early. T - They did do that and let them have those rates. But they signed a clawback agreement which means they have to pay back the difference. We know they want the high rates. We're really looking at 3PM EST or later. Don't even start looking for it before then. That's after all the meetings are done. We hope to get info from this meeting so we can do a blast. But we do know if there's a problem tomorrow morning she will take it over and solve the problem.
C - I'm being called crazy for believing in the GCR, which they say is not found anywhere? Do you have any info that REALLY will be one? T - I got a call from a guy right before this call and he has a billion dinar (1 or 2). He's on this call now. He called me to tell me that he had just spoken with the regional wealth manager and she told me I was absolutely crazy and this was the biggest fraud ever. I happen to know for a fact that HER BANK has 5 call centers all setup. They added more people over the weekend at cashout centers. But she says this morning it's the biggest fraud in the world. What do you think?
Last Updated on Tuesday, 26 November 2013 13:22
Sunday, 24 November 2013 23:24
School Food Fascism & Aussie Vaccine Spray! Nov 25/13
A mom who thought she was properly parenting by sending her two young kids to school with a homemade, whole-food lunch was shocked to find a penalty note from school officials informing her that the lunch of roast beef, potatoes, carrots, oranges and milk she provided was "unbalanced" and therefore had to be supplemented with Ritz crackers.
She was also fined $10.
According to Weighty Matters, the Manitoba Government's Early Learning and Child Care department blindly follows a policy which requires lunches to be "balanced" according to "Canada's awful Food Guide."
Unbalanced lunches are subject to supplementation and a fine of CDN$5 (US$4.80) per "missing item" per child.
In Kristen Bartkiw's case, she "neglected" to include "grains" with Natalie and Logan's packed lunches — a "dereliction" that was "corrected" through the "supplementation" of Ritz crackers.
According to the nutrition facts found on its homepage, a serving of Ritz crackers (~10 crackers) contains 6.5g of fat, of which nearly half is saturated.
To drive home the ridiculousness of the policy, Kristen tells Weighty Matters she could have sent her kids to daycare with "microwave Kraft Dinner and a hot dog, a package of fruit twists, a Cheestring, and a juice box," and it would have been met with approval by the MCCA.
As a follow-up, Kristen notes that other parents falling short of Manitoba's policy has resulted in the creation of a hot lunch program, which she described as "great."
Correction: Due to an error at the source, a previous version of this article incorrectly identified the Manitoba Child Care Association as the lunch policy's author.
Australia Determined To Forcibly Vaccinate By Intentional and Controlled Release of Aerosolized GMO Vaccine
The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) is on its way to approve a licence application from PaxVax Australia (PaxVax) for the intentional release of a GMO vaccine consisting of live bacteria into the environment in Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and Victoria.
According to the regulator, it qualifies as a limited and controlled release under section 50A of the Gene Technology Act 2000 (the Act).
PaxVax is seeking approval to conduct the clinical trial of a genetically modified live bacterial vaccine against cholera. Once underway the trial is expected to be completed within one year, with trial sites selected from local government areas (LGAs) in Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia. PaxVax has proposed a number of control measures they say will restrict the spread and persistence of the GM vaccine and its introduced genetic material, however there is always a possiblity of these restrictions failing and infecting wildlife and ecosystems.
Aerial vaccines have used in the United States directed towards animals by the use of plastic packets dropped by planes or helicopters. Sanofi (who is one of the largest vaccine manufacturers in the world) has subsidiary companies such as Merial Limited who manufacture Raboral, an oral live-virus poisonous to humans yet distributed wildlife in the masses.
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
Page 8 of 792