India Vaccine Paralyzes & Infant Autism May 17/12

MANDATED Oral Polio Vaccine leaves 47,500 children in India PARALYZED
Watch this 4 min clip.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rJBib-3q6A

Cdsapi’s Added Comment:

Has anyone heard of the SPIN-Doctors?  
Many of them seem to be employed by the “MANDATORY VACCINE”  DEFENDERS.

Let’s see what THEY have to say  
-  and then  -  LOOK AT THE FACTS – the FACTS that they never tell you about – bury and deny.

They vehemently CLAIM that VACCINES are the SAFE and EFFICACIOUS

They vehemently CLAIM that LIVE VIRUS VACCINES are NOT INFECTIOUS.

They vehemently CLAIM that VACCINES have eradicated infectious diseases  - and that we need a lot more vaccines  “TO CONQUER”  every last virus, bacteria or other infectious agent.

They CLAIM that vaccinated children are “HEALTH PROTECTED”. 
Therefore the government, in its “protector role” must mandate for ALL children, from infancy on, the VACCINE HEALTH PROTECTION  -  (with taxpayer dollars, of course).

They CLAIM that the myriad of Adverse Effects that people “experience” are merely “COINCIDENTAL” and “WITHOUT CAUSAL CONNECTION.”  They would have happened anyway.   (Weird, they always seem to follow on the heels of the vaccination times. Apparently just unfortunate timing)

Then they insist on the need to make ALL Vaccinations MANDATORY – to provide “HERD PROTECTION”. (Not to do so makes one an “unfit parent, with the possibility of facing “felony charges” and losing custody of one’s children. – All in the name of “protection”.)

But let’s look at just a FEW of the FACTS that they have not divulged, explained or told you before.

Remember 2011  -  when, together with a World Health Organization Mandate, the Bill Gates Foundation, in its infinite generosity, donated Billions of Dollars to protect the children in the Third World from the ravages of polio, in what became the POLIO ERADICATION PROGRAM – and was became the MANDATORY  - house to house at gunpoint, if necessary – forced administration  of the LIVE VIRUS ORAL POLIO VACCINE.

Several years earlier, the same “exercise of protection” was administered in Uganda, where entire families were wiped out with the Live Virus Oral Polio Vacine  “Induced Polio”

Let’s look at the aftermath in India – following the 2011 Polio Eradication Program.

Whereas polio cases were very rare before, immediately after the Vaccine Program, 47,500 children suffer paralysis.  
Because it is Politically Incorrect to Implicate the POLIO VACCINE, they have renamed this as “non-polio paralysis”.   (Co-incidental, of course.  And not cause-related to the “just administered polio vaccine”, of course.)

Please take 4 minutes of your time to listen to some rather interesting “fact research” that demands that we all do a double-take before we continue to endorse what can only be described as mandated “Vaccine Insanity”.

Bill Gates Oral Polio Vaccine Cripples 47,500 Children

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rJBib-3q6A

Just a rather interesting side observation:

For over 60 plus years, scarlet fever literally disappeared from the map  -  without a vaccine.

Yet now, all of a sudden, it is here again.  (Or misdiagnosed.) 
My son informed me yesterday that his school has a “scarlet fever outbreak”. 
From where???
(Do I suspect “a worm in the woodpile”?   You bet!    Just waiting to see how they are going propagandize this one, real or fabricated)

My next question, of course, is what else they have in their “mutation laboratories” with which we might get “surprised” –  when they need another “scare factor” to lure us back into the Pied Piper’s Den , or they determine it is time for the long-promised “depopulation factor”. 
As Bill Gates recently explained at a conference, “Smart Vaccines” can be used as a valuable tool to deal with the “population problem”.

Parents Fight EMF & Top 10 GMO! May 17/12

Dear Parents and Grandparents,

Please support Resolution #17 "Parent Choice Regarding Exposure to EMF Emissions" at the upcoming BCCPAC (BC Confederation of Parent Advisory Councils) Annual General Meeting on May 26, 2012. This resolution is not asking to remove Wi-Fi from all schools, but to provide wireless-free schools of choice. (Similar to French immersion, Montessori, or schools that emphasize a certain subject/sport, which are already available in BC.) It has taken hundreds of hours of work and debate in the BCCPAC Safety Committee to advance this resolution to the table. This is a much-needed opt-out solution for parents who want to follow the advice for precaution, as well as for children who have negative biological reaction to the pulsed microwave radiation emitted by Wi-Fi and wireless electronic devices in schools. These children are currently suffering physical symptoms while attending classes, or have to be withdrawn from schools because they are unable to take personal measures to avoid such exposure in campuses with Wi-Fi installed.http://www.bccpac.bc.ca/UserFiles/File/2012AGM-Spring/2012_Resolution_Book_Updated.pdf

Votes can be cast by all paid-up BCCPAC member PACs and DPACs, either by attending the AGM or by proxy votes.

Voting Information & Proxy Rules:

http://www.bccpac.bc.ca/UserFiles/File/2012AGM-Spring/AGM_Voting_Info_Proxy_Form.pdf

Voting Instructions:

http://www.bccpac.bc.ca/UserFiles/File/2012AGM-Spring/2012_Resolution_Voting_Instructions.pdf

Authorized Proxy Vote Form:

http://www.bccpac.bc.ca/UserFiles/File/2012AGM-Spring/Authorized%20Proxy%20Vote%20Form.pdf

Spring Conference Registration & Program:

http://www.bccpac.bc.ca/index/event_calendar/2012%20Spring%20Conf.aspx

If you would like to support this resolution, please contact your PAC or DPAC to communicate your concern, and please share the info with other parents and grandparents.

Resolutions # 17

Parent Choice Regarding Exposure to EMF Emissions

from SRC Safety Wi-Fi Subcommittee

http://www.bccpac.bc.ca/UserFiles/File/2012AGM-Spring/2012_Resolution_Book_Updated.pdf

Submitted by: BCCPAC Board of Directors

Be it resolved that

BCCPAC calls on each Board of Education to have one public school at each education level (elementary, middle, secondary) that is free of Wi-Fi, cordless phones and cell phones. This school will only be equipped with wired computers and wired telephones for personal, educational and administrative purposes. This will not be required in cases where there is only one school available of that type in that district.

N.B. The above resolution was supported by some members of the Safety committee. Other members of the committee do not consider Wi-Fi a significant health risk and believe there is no need to exclude the use of Wi-Fi in any school until it is conclusively declared as being harmful by Health Canada and the World Health Organization. The committee is divided and consensus was not achievable. We refer this resolution to the membership for their consideration and decision.

Rationale:

In British Columbia, many school districts have installed Wi-Fi in recent years and other schools are now contemplating its use. At the same time, more children are using wireless technology, bringing their own cell phones and smart phones to schools.

In May, 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO) has classified "Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields" "emitted by wireless communication devices" as Type 2B Possible Carcinogen (possible cancer risk to humans). The WHO report concluded that "additional research is important"; and advised the public, particularly young adults and children, to "take pragmatic measures to reduce exposure". This classification also includes Wi-Fi emissions as so affirmed by IARC experts as follows:

“So the classification 2B, possibly carcinogenic, holds for all types of radiation within the radiofrequency part of the electromagnetic spectrum, including the radiation emitted by base-station antennas, radio/TV towers, radar, Wi-Fi, smart meters, etc." ”"This is what the Working Group discussed and decided last year. Of course, because the exposure levels for many of these other devices and exposure situations are so much lower than the exposure to someone who has a functioning cell phone against her/his ear, the risk will be considerably less (although the hazard still exists)."  http://www.iarc.fr/en/mediacentre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf

Further information and clarifications from the WHO on this classification is here:

http://tinyurl.com/7fync2w http://goo.gl/77ztt

In October, 2011, Health Canada encouraged, “…parents to reduce children's RF (radiofrequency radiation) exposure from cell phones since children are typically more sensitive to a variety of environmental agents" and "there is currently a lack of scientific information regarding the potential health impacts of cell phones on children"; (http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/media/advisoriesavis/_2011/2011_131-eng.php )

In January, 2012, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine published, "Chronic exposure to wireless radio frequency radiation is a preventable environmental hazard that is sufficiently well documented to warrant immediate preventative public health action... Children are placed at particular risk for altered brain development, and impaired learning and behaviour."

http://aaemonline.org/images/CaliforniaPublicUtilitiesCommission.pdf

Some parents are concerned about the long-term health effects of wireless devices on children, given the long hours that children spend in schools and the fact that it is not feasible for children to take personal measures to avoid such exposure. These parents prefer to adopt the “Precautionary Principle“ by using proven wired technology solutions. In recent years some students in different school districts have reported adverse biological reactions such as headaches, dizziness, rapid heart rate, fatigue and impaired concentration when exposed to the radiofrequency emitted by Wi-Fi and wireless devices in the school environment. These students currently have no alternative to avoid such exposure while attending schools. The causal relationship of these claims is disputed by some scientists while other scientists are convinced that the symptoms experienced by these patients are valid, and that such exposure should be avoided.

Destination:

Ministry of Education

BC School Trustees Association (BCSTA)

BC Boards of Education
BC Chief Medical Officer Dr. Perry Kendall's Letter on Wi-Fi for Schools: Erroneous Representation of Radiation Data.

Using a study sponsored by Wi-Fi Alliance (companies that manufacture and sell Wi-Fi products), medical authorities are assuring parents that Wi-Fi is not dangerous. This study has nothing to do with classroom exposure. The locations measured (coffee shops, train stations, hospitals etc.) were hand-picked by the Wi-Fi Alliance members When they measured a laptop, they measured at least 1 meter away (at least 3.3 feet; did not specify the maximum distance). This does not take into account that children are using laptops, tablets and wireless hand-held devices in close/direct contact with their bodies, and accessing from the internet simultaneously in the classroom. Every one of these devices has a client's card which is a live antenna. Actual measurement of the Wi-Fi radiation signals from these devices (see videos below) are magnitudes - up to 700,000 times - higher than what's reported by the industry study.
Read full post: http://www.safeinschool.org/2012/04/bc-chief-medical-officer-dr-perry.html

Wi-Fi and Cellphone Radiation Comparison

Here are 2 videos to illustrate the comparison between an iPad on Wi-Fi mode and an iPhone on talking mode:

iPhone on Talking mode:
-Peaked at 19 μW/cm2 (microwatts/cm2)

-Continuous signal, but duration of use in talking mode likely shorter than internet browsing.

-Phone will be in direct contact with the ear and head (unless handsfree or headset are used).
-Wi-Fi was turned off on this phone.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n097VN7KB_A

iPad on Wi-Fi mode:
-Peaked at 70 μW/cm2; higher than iphone on talk mode, but duration of us for iPad is likely longer than talk-mode on cellphone.

-Continual signals. Stop and spike every few seconds.

The Queen Bank of Canada Lawsuit & Arrests May 17/12

COURT SEAL

Court File No.:T-2010-11

FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN

COMMITTEE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC REFORM (“COMER”), WILLIAM KREHM, AND ANN EMMETT

Plaintiffs

- and -

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, THE MINISTER OF FINANCE,

THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, THE BANK OF CANADA,

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Defendants

STATEMENT OF CLAIM

(Pursuant to s.17 (1) and (5)(b) Federal Courts Act, and s.24(1) and 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982)

(Filed this 12th day of December, 2011)

TO THE DEFENDANT:

A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED AGAINST YOU by the Applicant. The claim made against you is set out in the following pages.

IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, you or a solicitor acting for you are required to prepare a statement of defence in Form 171B prescribed by the Federal Courts Rules, serve it on the applicant’s solicitor or, where the applicant does not have a solicitor, serve it on the applicant, and file it, with proof of service, at a local office of this Court, WITHIN 30 DAYS after this statement of claim is served on you, if you are served within Canada.

Copies of the Federal Courts Rules, information concerning the local offices of the Court and other necessary information may be obtained on request to the Administrator of this Court at Ottawa (telephone 613-992-4238) or at any local office.

IF YOU FAIL TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, judgment may be given against you in your absence and without further notice to you.

Date:   December 12th, 2011

Issued by:

Address of local office:

Federal Court of Canada

180 Queen Street West, Suite 200

Toronto, Ontario M5V 3L6

TO:

Department of Justice Ontario Regional Office First Canadian Place The Exchange Tower 130 King Street West Suite 3400, Box 36 Toronto, Ontario M5X 1K6

AND TO:

Bank of Canada 234 Wellington St. Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G9

CLAIM

1.         The Plaintiffs claim:

(a)       declarations that:

i)          the Minister of Finance, and Government of Canada is required to

request, and that the Bank of Canada is statutorily required, when necessary, to make interest-free loans, on the terms set out under s.18(i) and (j) of the Bank of Canada Act, RSC, 1985, c. B-2 (the “Act”)

for the purposes of “human capital” expenditures and/or municipal/provincial/federal “human capital” and/or infrastructure expenditures;

ii)        that the “Government of Canada”, the Minister of Finance, and Her

Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, with the Bank of Canada,

A/ have abdicated their statutory and constitutional duties  with

respect to ss. 18(i) and (j) of the Bank of Canada Act which

subsections read:

18. The Bank may

…

(i) make loans or advances for periods not exceeding six months to the Government of Canada or the government of a province on taking security in readily marketable securities issued or guaranteed by Canada or any province;

(j) make loans to the Government of Canada or the government of any province, but such loans outstanding at any one time shall not, in the case of the Government of Canada, exceed one-third of the estimated revenue of the Government of Canada for its fiscal year, and shall not, in the case of a provincial government, exceed one-fourth of that government's estimated revenue for its fiscal year, and such loans shall be repaid before the end of the first quarter after the end of the fiscal year of the government that has contracted the loan;

B/ and further that the refusal to request and make (interest free) loans under s. 18(i) and (j) of the Bank of Canada Act has resulted in negative and destructive impact on Canadians by the disintegration of Canada’s economy, its financial institutions, increase in public debt, decrease in social services, as well as a widening gap between rich and poorwith an continuing disappearance of the middle class;